head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 You see models/actresses in shower or in a swimming pool showing off their skin and how the product such as a soap or lotion has helped them be more attractive. I wonder what is the difference between these Models and a real porn star. One is showing half of her assets the other one is showing her assets totally? Why discriminate then socially? Dont you agree?
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 My point is both are selling their body!
Ram Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 Why stop with Ad models ? By your yardstick, A film heroine who wears revealing clothes also *sells* her body. Actually, if we apply your logic, 99% of women are *selling* their "body" at some point, in some way or the other.
Guest HariSampath Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 ^ NO...I disagree. In todays context, by even western standards, any supermodel posing on camera , even if scantily clad and with a huge sex quotient , is FAR MORE decent than a woman actually performing acts of sex on camera for the benefit of millions ( online or video/cd), which is equal to saying..."please watch me facking on 2nd avenue and main st"..that is practically facking in public....this is a long way off from modeling for cosmetics/products by attractive models who stick to the right side of decency, and dont become obscenely vulgar in public ( that is naked and facking etc)...no comparision...
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 Why stop with Ad models ? By your yardstick, A film heroine who wears revealing clothes also *sells* her body. Actually, if we apply your logic, 99% of women are *selling* their "body" at some point, in some way or the other. Wow that is a harsh statement. Women in this forum might ask you to apologize!
Ram Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 Wow that is a harsh statement. Women in this forum might ask you to apologize! Hehe.. The operative term here is, " By your standards", not mine Sir. Dont credit me with doing something I didnt do.
Gambit Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 What silly logic. A porn star doesn't merely show her 'assets'. She performs sexual acts in front of the camera in order to make a living. A ramp lingerie model doesn't even come close to doing this.
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 ^ NO...I disagree. In todays context' date=' by even western standards, any supermodel posing on camera , even if scantily clad and with a huge sex quotient , is FAR MORE decent than a woman actually performing acts of sex on camera for the benefit of millions ( online or video/cd), which is equal to saying..."please watch me facking on 2nd avenue and main st"..that is practically facking in public....this is a long way off from [b']modeling for cosmetics/products by attractive models who stick to the right side of decency, and dont become obscenely vulgar in public ( that is naked and facking etc)...no comparision... By using an attractive model in less clothes, the company that sells the product is looking at the sexual appeasement of the audience to gain more sales. The porn star also is doing the same to gain more sales of the video she is making. What is the difference really?
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 What silly logic. A porn star doesn't merely show her 'assets'. She performs sexual acts in front of the camera in order to make a living. A ramp lingerie model doesn't even come close to doing this. Gambit all are doing this. It is just the extend one goes into that differs.
Predator_05 Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 My point is both are selling their body! Yeah. Even women who wear short skirts and tight tanktops with their tits hanging out (mmm...) are selling their body like porn stars and models - they are just being a little less explicit. We should just ban women from wearing clothing.
Gambit Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 Gambit all are doing this. It is just the extend one goes into that differs. "All" don't do it in front of the camera for the entire world to buy and watch. Seriously, what kind of logic is this.
beetle Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 Showing body and having sex are two different acts. Showing ones body is acceptable behaviour to a certain extent. Having sex in public is a taboo .
Gambit Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 What headcoach is saying is akin to comparing a pole dancer stripping for money to a bharat natyam artist dancing for money.
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 "All" don't do it in front of the camera for the entire world to buy and watch. Seriously' date=' what kind of logic is this.[/quote'] It is sex that sells whether it is a SOAP or a VIDEO. Got it?
Ram Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 What silly logic. A porn star doesn't merely show her 'assets'. She performs sexual acts in front of the camera in order to make a living. A ramp lingerie model doesn't even come close to doing this. I am curious to know, How many here will be willing to marry a lingerie model ? We need to do a Poll. The Crux of what i am saying is - " Yes a Porn star does "sell" her body", but how drastically different is it, to this ? " She wore this clothes, fully aware of *what* will be *seen* by all, but the point is, she still wore it, because she wants the whole world to *see* it. Generally, it seems as though in our society, the ultimate test of sexual integrity is whether there is any act of penetration or not and I tend to disagree with that. P.S - At this point, I would like to categorically state that i am no sexist, who looks down upon women in a demeaning manner. My only grouse is, our society has different yardsticks for different women. Prostitutes are looked down upon, why celeb actors have gotten nude several times during shooting, are revered. Why this double standards !
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 What headcoach is saying is akin to comparing a pole dancer stripping for money to a bharat natyam artist dancing for money. If you consider a porn star as an artist then it is fair to compare her with a bharat natyam artist. Both are engaged in some form of art really
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 I am curious to know, How many here will be willing to marry a lingerie model ? We need to do a Poll. The Crux of what i am saying is - " Yes a Porn star does "sell" her body", but how drastically different is it, to this ? " She worn this clothes, fully aware of *what* will be *seen* by all, but the point is, she still wore it, because she wants the whole world to *see* it. Generally, it seems as though in our society, the ultimate test of sexual integrity is whether there is any act of penetration or not and I tend to disagree with that. P.S - At this point, I would like to categorically state that i am no sexist, who looks down upon women in a demeaning manner. My only grouse is, our society has different yardsticks for different women. Prostitutes are looked down upon, why celeb actors have gotten nude several times during shooting, are revered. Why this double standards ! hehe stay away from those hormone generating photos. Yeah totally my point. Glad you got it!
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 Showing body and having sex are two different acts. Showing ones body is acceptable behaviour to a certain extent. Having sex in public is a taboo . Well it is changing Beetle. Last time I went to India, I saw couples kissing and engaged in sexual acts inside a train. So new generation don't see it that way. Are you saying it is okay for couples to do it not porn stars who get money for doing it? That is ridiculous
Gambit Posted February 14, 2008 Posted February 14, 2008 If you consider a porn star as an artist then it is fair to compare her with a bharat natyam artist. Both are engaged in some form of art really I don't consider porn an act, maybe you do. Hey, it's your choice and I'm not judging. It is sex that sells whether it is a SOAP or a VIDEO. Got it? No. You don't get it. A woman advertising soap or cosmetic products is aimed at the female market. Men may ogle at the advert but they don't go out and buy Nivea spot removal cream...wait a minute?! Don't tell me you have.....convinced by all the 'sex' in the ad?
head coach Posted February 14, 2008 Author Posted February 14, 2008 I don't consider porn an act, maybe you do. Hey, it's your choice and I'm not judging. No. You don't get it. A woman advertising soap or cosmetic products is aimed at the female market. Men may ogle at the advert but they don't go out and buy Nivea spot removal cream...wait a minute?! Don't tell me you have.....convinced by all the 'sex' in the ad? You mean to say for just lesbians or gays? Common please dont pretend to be innocent to say that women dont watch other women indulged in sexual acts and men dont watch other men doing it
Recommended Posts