Jump to content

Comparison of great specialist cricketers with great all-rounders


Is a great all-rounder more useful than a great specialist in an international xi?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Is a great all-rounder more useful than a great specialist in an international xi?



Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Answer my question first. Name the strategic strokes at the disposal of batters in baseball vs cricket. The answer to this question, WHICH I ASKED FIRST AND YOU ARE YET TO ANSWER, is pertinent to answering your question. Why are you stalling on answering this simple question for weeks ?? If you refuse to answer the question, STFU and admit you are wrong. You have no answer because you are a coward who runs away from simple sports questions.

So your whole supposition and premise is wrong. The answer is you screwed up and you dont want to admit.

 

Why is sitting on your @ss more starategic than 100m dash? You made this statement. I did not Now own it.

Link to comment
On 11/2/2019 at 12:14 PM, Khota said:

So your whole supposition and premise is wrong. The answer is you screwed up and you dont want to admit.

 

The answer is you are refusing to answer the question which proves you wrong. Which is why you are avoiding the question like the plague and refuse to answer it for weeks, even when promised that your later query will be answered in sequence once you answer the question I posed first, since it was asked first and is relevant to the answer. Why are you running away from answering the question ? 

On 11/2/2019 at 12:14 PM, Khota said:

Why is sitting on your @ss more starategic than 100m dash? You made this statement. I did not Now own it.

the answer to the question requires you to answer the number of strategic strokes at a batsman’s disposal in cricket vs the hitters in baseball. Why are you dodging this simple question ?? 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

 

The answer is you are refusing to answer the question which proves you wrong. Which is why you are avoiding the question like the plague and refuse to answer it for weeks, even when promised that your later query will be answered in sequence once you answer the question I posed first, since it was asked first and is relevant to the answer. Why are you running away from answering the question ? 

the answer to the question requires you to answer the number of strategic strokes at a batsman’s disposal in cricket vs the hitters in baseball. Why are you dodging this simple question ?? 

Dogs keep on barking but the caravan passes on. Old proverb.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Khota said:

Dogs keep on barking but the caravan passes on. Old proverb.

Stop trying to dodge and answer the question asked to you first:

 

Name the strategic strokes at the disposal of batters in cricket vs hitters in baseball.

 

You are dodging because answering this question PROVES you are wrong and serves as evidence to the question you asked me later.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Stop trying to dodge and answer the question asked to you first:

 

Name the strategic strokes at the disposal of batters in cricket vs hitters in baseball.

 

You are dodging because answering this question PROVES you are wrong and serves as evidence to the question you asked me later.

Slow === More strategy. My foot.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Name the strategic strokes available to batters in slow sport of cricket vs sluggers in the faster sport of baseball.

 

Stop running away from question for weeks because answering this question destroys your moronic point.

Slow ====== More Strategy. Explain.

Link to comment
21 minutes ago, Khota said:

Slow ====== More Strategy. Explain.

Name the strategic strokes at the disposal of batters in slower cricket than in faster baseball. Answering this question proves the point that slower sports have more strategic options. Stop running away from answering the question. 

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Name the strategic strokes at the disposal of batters in slower cricket than in faster baseball. Answering this question proves the point that slower sports have more strategic options. Stop running away from answering the question. 

Slow ==== More strategy. Explain once again.

Link to comment
42 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

The explanation is in the answer to the question I asked you first. Name strategic strokes at disposal of batters in slower sport like cricket vs faster sport like baseball. Answer the question instead of running away.

I still don't have the answer. Delay is form of denial.

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Khota said:

I still don't have the answer. Delay is form of denial.

I asked my question before you asked yours and I still don’t have an answer. The answer to your question is the answer to mine. Delay is a form of denial, stop delaying and answer the question: what strategic strokes do batters in slower game like cricket have at their disposal compared to sluggers in a faster sport like baseball ? 

Link to comment

a great AR will add more value than a great specialist IMO. the difficulty, however, is that such truly great ARs are very hard to come by. likes of sobers, miller, kallis, bottle captain (imran), bottom, faulkner, kapil, etc.

Edited by Vijy
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...