Jump to content

Would it be fair to say Nadeem has out performed Ashwin


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

highest wkt taker of the series doesnt take a place he owns it.....he was the best bowler of the series so he owns it

Yea in some years when ull disappear from ICF coz he ll break so many records at a rate that many cudnt

 

Also nadeem came in for kuldeep place...ashwin n jadeja are legend in indian condition and their position cant be touched. Their record is as good as any ATG at home 

Someone just did and ICF experts are insecure.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Khota said:

Someone just did and ICF experts are insecure.

really who touched the guy who didnt find a place in next test ....so the joke is on u 

 

and even if he wud have Fact check it wud have been for kuldeep not ashwin

Ashwin n jadeja cannot be dropped in Indian condition in test when they do ping me ......till then live in ur delusion as ashwin will keep breaking records left right centre 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

really who touched the guy who didnt find a place in next test ....so the joke is on u 

 

and even if he wud have Fact check it wud have been for kuldeep not ashwin

Ashwin n jadeja cannot be dropped in Indian condition in test when they do ping me ......till then live in ur delusion as ashwin will keep breaking records left right centre 

Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins.

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Khota said:

Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins.

Are u fcking serious....vijay was struggling for runs....ashwin is the highest wkt taker of series....how is that same . Murali alone didnt cost those series ....for u memory all 3 openers failed and pujara n rahane were extremely inconsistent to. No one players can loose a series 

 

These two are winning series after series at home.....for info India hasnt lost a series since 2012 at home....so complain when they loose at home .  

Ashwin avg 22 at home

jadeja 20......

 

So they are untouchable at home......not only that these 2 contribute with bat which nadeem , kuldeep cant

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
38 minutes ago, Khota said:

Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins.

as if ur suggestion to include dhawan n kartik won us in England.....both were **** n got kicked out permanently post that in test cricket 

Posted
8 hours ago, Khota said:

How on earth did you come to this conclusion it is one off? Maybe it is the norm.

It is a one off because it has happened only once. A singular instance is always one off in statistics. But what isn’t a one off is Ashwin destroying Dartbhajan when they played together .

Posted
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Are u fcking serious....vijay was struggling for runs....ashwin is the highest wkt taker of series....how is that same . Murali alone didnt cost those series ....for u memory all 3 openers failed and pujara n rahane were extremely inconsistent to. No one players can loose a series 

 

These two are winning series after series at home.....for info India hasnt lost a series since 2012 at home....so complain when they loose at home .  

Ashwin avg 22 at home

jadeja 20......

 

So they are untouchable at home......not only that these 2 contribute with bat which nadeem , kuldeep cant

So a new guy comes along, outperforms but the brahmins of Indian cricket are untouchables. When you learn to understand that anyone can be dropped than you will understand sports. Nothing against you but you know zilch about competitive sports.

Posted
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

as if ur suggestion to include dhawan n kartik won us in England.....both were **** n got kicked out permanently post that in test cricket 

Dhawan >>>> Murali as an opener.

 

Kartik >>>>> Dhoni as wkt kpr.

Posted
5 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

It is a one off because it has happened only once. A singular instance is always one off in statistics. But what isn’t a one off is Ashwin destroying Dartbhajan when they played together .

This will be the norm if he gets the opportunity. The simple explanation is why Nadeem did better is because as of now Ashwin sucks.

Posted
27 minutes ago, Khota said:

This will be the norm if he gets the opportunity.

This is a wishful thinking from a biassed person like you, not fact.

27 minutes ago, Khota said:

The simple explanation is why Nadeem did better is because as of now Ashwin sucks.

The simple explanation is , it’s a one off fluke, which one offs are. And if Nadeem is better than Ashwin due to a one off, Ashwin is definitely better than Bhajji coz he outdid Bhajji in five times as many games as Nadeem has to Ashwin.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Khota said:

So a new guy comes along, outperforms but the brahmins of Indian cricket are untouchables. When you learn to understand that anyone can be dropped than you will understand sports. Nothing against you but you know zilch about competitive sports.

Nowhere in competitive sports do we drop a stalwart ball of famer because a newbie on his debut outdid the stalwart. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

This is a wishful thinking from a biassed person like you, not fact.

The simple explanation is , it’s a one off fluke, which one offs are. And if Nadeem is better than Ashwin due to a one off, Ashwin is definitely better than Bhajji coz he outdid Bhajji in five times as many games as Nadeem has to Ashwin.

Why is Bhajji in this discussion? If your guy is so good he would not take double the overs to get half the wkts.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Nowhere in competitive sports do we drop a stalwart ball of famer because a newbie on his debut outdid the stalwart. 

We bench them all the time. Kindly use the word stalwart carefully.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Khota said:

Why is Bhajji in this discussion? If your guy is so good he would not take double the overs to get half the wkts.

Because of consistency in your argument. If A >B based on 1 sample, then B>C based on 5 samples. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Khota said:

We bench them all the time. Kindly use the word stalwart carefully.

So name one time a debutant has caused an ALLTIME GREAT STALWART to be benched in any sport, after just one game.

 

we are using the word Stalwart carefully. Ashwin is a stalwart. Bhajji was not.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Because of consistency in your argument. If A >B based on 1 sample, then B>C based on 5 samples. 

So A is greater than B. Thanks!

Posted
52 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

So name one time a debutant has caused an ALLTIME GREAT STALWART to be benched in any sport, after just one game.

 

we are using the word Stalwart carefully. Ashwin is a stalwart. Bhajji was not.

Seriously?

Posted
1 hour ago, Khota said:

Seriously?

Seriously. Man has ATG numbers. Bhajji was a mediocre and inferior bowler as we have proven and you keep running away from it due to Punjabi pride issues. 

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Khota said:

Dhawan >>>> Murali as an opener.

In od's  - yes 

In test - No. 

 

Dhawan has 2 tours of SA n ENG yet not a single 50 yea .....even shami scored a 50 in england 

 

N we are talking about test cricket something thats played with red ball 

Quote

 

Kartik >>>>> Dhoni as wkt kpr.

Even DK wont agree to that :hysterical:

 

Dhoni - ATG in ODI

Kartik- waste of talent ....also what has he done 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...