nevada Posted August 16, 2020 Posted August 16, 2020 (edited) On 1/23/2020 at 10:47 PM, zen said: Rather than being a retirement event, WC should be an event where we only play those who are in best form WC farewell is a ploy for has beens to prolong their career. The selectors should drop anyone - regardless of their legend status if they are not in good form. Dhoni had already dragged on for a couple of years for the world cup and even after it ended, didn't quit. Was angling for another WC farewell through T20 WC, with buffoons like Shastri egging him on. For one who got so much out of the game, he should have made a better exit. Edited August 16, 2020 by nevada
zen Posted August 16, 2020 Author Posted August 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, nevada said: WC farewell is a ploy for has beens to prolong their career. The selectors should drop anyone - regardless of their legend status if they are not in good form. Dhoni had already dragged on for a couple of years for the world cup and even after it ended, didn't quit. Was angling for another WC farewell through T20 WC, with buffoons like Shastri egging him on. For one who got so much out of the game, he should have made a better exit. Ideally, one should be retired/dropped 2 yrs before a major event if unlikely to play that event. 2 yrs gives enough opportunity to groom the replacement
gakgupta Posted August 16, 2020 Posted August 16, 2020 On 1/23/2020 at 8:30 PM, zen said: In Ind, we expect our cricketers to retire at the right time. However, our system is also designed, in a way, to support the great cricketers and help them prolong their careers even if they are near (or even past) their expiry date. Most Indian cricketers tend to take advantage of this system (selector's reluctance to have a tough conversation with the player, fan support including attacking potential replacement, the classic - even at 50%, he is better than others, etc.). Also Ind tends to be reactive than proactive so having a system that proactively develops a new player to take the spot of an expiring/expired incumbent takes a back seat. In such a muddled/reactive system, who are the cricketers who retired on a high and/or when the time was right? Gavaskar for one comes to mind. He retired on a high in 1987. Surprised...no one is mentioning about Rahul... He retired after a wonderful series against England... Even laxman retired on time...
gakgupta Posted August 16, 2020 Posted August 16, 2020 Also...someone should open a thread...who dragged their retirement... First one on that list would be sachin and then Dhoni.. Even Ricky dragged it a little...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now