Jump to content

Google Cricket popularity comparision


Recommended Posts

Posted

This is the best way of comparing popularity of players. Google is the world's most popular search engine....lets compare some players' popularity on Google...i.e. which player's name is searched the most on Google. Presenting a comparison between India's batting stars: Sachin, Sourav, Dravid, Laxman and Sehwag: No points for guessing who is the winner....Sachin wins by a huge margin. Guess what, Sachin beats Ganguly even in Calcutta. Yes, even Bengalies prefer Sachin over dada. Have a look: j7teds.jpg

Posted
sachin on top as always :D poor vvs i dont see a line for sehwag, maybe its coz his name is spelt wrong
Here it is with correct spelling. You will see one fine line at the end of 2008- for his 300:two_thumbs_up: 25gw7ys.jpg
Posted

it seems Ganguly will always Lag behind in the Legacy among the cricketing world and among the general cricket loving public... Its not his fault though..he is not talented enough.. People of UK are very lazy..:giggle:

Posted

Here its is between Tendulkar, Lara and Ponting. Yes, Ponting exists....somewhere. Lara and Tendulkar are almost on par with Tendulkar dominating mostly, but Lara getting big peaks in between. Its not entirely fair as Lara gets huge advantage from the popular cricket game named after him. I have pointed out why Lara was in news during these peaks. fay26p.jpg

Posted
it seems Ganguly will always Lag behind in the Legacy among the cricketing world and among the general cricket loving public... Its not his fault though..he is not talented enough.. People of UK are very lazy..:giggle:
No, we the people of UK dont need google, we have our sources ready :dance:
Posted
Problem is' date=' people rarely search with their full names. Here's one with just the last names: [/quote'] But then Ganguly is such a common surname, whereas Tendulkar and Sehwag are not. That's why the results for Gangs is much higher if you only use the surname.
Posted
But then Ganguly is such a common surname' date=' whereas Tendulkar and Sehwag are not. That's why the results for Gangs is much higher if you only use the surname.[/quote'] Quite correct. The fairest comparison would come out of using full names only. Only first name or only last name would be misleading.
Posted

surat, india wooow first time ill prolly see my hometown nuemro uno i will cherish this moment forevr :eyedance::eyedance::eyedance::eyedance::yay::yay: kodak moment :D

Posted

Also on Orkut, if u check the largest communities of plyers, they are: Sachin - 391, 879 fans Dada - 150, 551 Rahul - 146, 767 Dhoni - 100, 716 Yuvraj - 71, 787 Irfan - 43, 964 Sehwag - 25, 970 Kumble - 17, 704 Laxman - 4656 But obviously u have to take into account that most of these people are from the big cities and the age demographic is like 18-30 so this doesnt really represent India but still it gives us a good idea.

Posted
Also on Orkut, if u check the largest communities of plyers, they are: Sachin - 391, 879 fansDada - 150, 551 Rahul - 146, 767 Dhoni - 100, 716 Yuvraj - 71, 787 Irfan - 43, 964 Sehwag - 25, 970 Kumble - 17, 704 Laxman - 4656 But obviously u have to take into account that most of these people are from the big cities and the age demographic is like 18-30 so this doesnt really represent India but still it gives us a good idea.
Even the so called King of bollywood is nowhere near Sach.. as far as the no. of members in Orkut.
Posted
Even the so called King of bollywood is nowhere near Sach.. as far as the no. of members in Orkut.
The popularity of any Bollywood hero is limited to the Hindi speaking population of the world. But SRT is an international celebrity. An Australian or a West Indian would not know who SRK is, but they would be big fans of SRT.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...