Jump to content

Is Chaminda Vaas the most successful trundler in the HISTORY of modern cricket ? 400 ODI wickets + 355 Test wickets


Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Pollock was fast in first half. He definitely doesn't qualify.

 

I've only read that,not seen. This is his debut match and he looks medium only,much slower than Donald :dontknow:

 

 

Posted

hadlee was the best fast-medium bowler I've seen, or at least second best. and he was fast-medium in an era where the "fast" (barring thommo and a few WI bowlers) bowlers were not as fast as 90s/00s speedsters. So, I would say that hadlee was closer to medium-fast by modern standards, and thus a trundler.

 

and if we call him a trundler, he was definitely much more potent and effective than vaas, pollock ,etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...