The endless Ambani wedding saga..

[Chaos]

Just now, Muloghonto said:

dumbass, server here doesnt mean compooter server. It means those who SERVE you at an event. We are talking about service industry here, dumb phuck.

Proof again of your room temperature IQ.

 

what u know about that too…nothing. U would be that faggg who tips $4 on $100 bill

[Muloghonto]

Just now, Chaos said:

Shoot this mfer already. He is too old anyways. Population control is the code.

says the retard who is interjecting in service industry related comment about servers ( aka performers, entertainers, butlers, waiters, etc- all those who SERVE YOU) with compooter server. As if there is any sense in talking about compooter servers in ambani wedding thread. Dumb phuck.

 

[Muloghonto]

Just now, Chaos said:

what u know about that too…nothing. U would be that faggg who tips $4 on $100 bill

I aint murrican, so i don't tip, wannabe white trash. 

Now yet again showing what a beta loser you are, that you cant even admit this most obvious error, confusing servers at an event with a compooter server. 

If you want population control, kindly dont breed. your regressive dna is not needed.

 

[Chaos]

Just now, Muloghonto said:

says the retard who is interjecting in service industry related comment about servers ( aka performers, entertainers, butlers, waiters, etc- all those who SERVE YOU) with compooter server. As if there is any sense in talking about compooter servers in ambani wedding thread. Dumb phuck.

 

thats hiw much i care avout ur posts. I dont go back to read ur non sense… im here to destroy u like biden

 

[Muloghonto]

Just now, Chaos said:

thats hiw much i care avout ur posts. I dont go back to read ur non sense… im here to destroy u like biden

 

 

Yes, you are going to destroy me, in an argument about whether ambani paid his servers legally or illegally, by talking about compooter servers like a dumb phuck. Makes sense.

 

[Chaos]

Just now, Muloghonto said:

I aint murrican, so i don't tip, wannabe white trash. 

Now yet again showing what a beta loser you are, that you cant even admit this most obvious error, confusing servers at an event with a compooter server. 

If you want population control, kindly dont breed. your regressive dna is not needed.

 

ur breed is already doomed..

[rangeelaraja]

11 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

There are no offshore servers in this instance legally, dumb white trash wannabe.

Even if you show up to india for 1 day to work in India, your income for that day is taxable by GoI under Indian law.

 

 

 

You filthy lying RAT

 

There is 90-day tax exemption rule for foreign workers in India is outlined under Section 10(6)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This provision stipulates that the remuneration received by an individual who is not a citizen of India for services rendered during their stay in India can be exempt from taxation under specific conditions:

1. The individual's stay in India does not exceed 90 days in the financial year.
2. The remuneration is paid by or on behalf of an employer who is not engaged in any trade or business in India.
3. The remuneration is not deductible from the income of the employer chargeable under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

[Chaos]

Just now, Muloghonto said:

Yes, you are going to destroy me, in an argument about whether ambani paid his servers legally or illegally, by talking about compooter servers like a dumb phuck. Makes sense.

 

who cares what ambhani does u effin moron

[Muloghonto]

Just now, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

You filthy lying RAT

 

There is 90-day tax exemption rule for foreign workers in India is outlined under Section 10(6)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This provision stipulates that the remuneration received by an individual who is not a citizen of India for services rendered during their stay in India can be exempt from taxation under specific conditions:

1. The individual's stay in India does not exceed 90 days in the financial year.
2. The remuneration is paid by or on behalf of an employer who is not engaged in any trade or business in India.
3. The remuneration is not deductible from the income of the employer chargeable under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

You lying filthy rat, none of the servers meet all three conditions. Now answer the question asked of you, instead of running away like a typical zoomer.

 

[rangeelaraja]

Just now, Chaos said:

who cares what ambhani does u effin moron

 

The cockroach loves lying and getting into arguments even though he knows he is lying. 

[rangeelaraja]

Just now, Muloghonto said:

 

You lying filthy rat, none of the servers meet all three conditions. Now answer the question asked of you, instead of running away like a typical zoomer.

 

 

MC ki aaulad.  90 day rule exempts foreign artists from being taxed you filthy SOB.

[Muloghonto]

2 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

You filthy lying RAT

 

There is 90-day tax exemption rule for foreign workers in India is outlined under Section 10(6)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This provision stipulates that the remuneration received by an individual who is not a citizen of India for services rendered during their stay in India can be exempt from taxation under specific conditions:

1. The individual's stay in India does not exceed 90 days in the financial year.
2. The remuneration is paid by or on behalf of an employer who is not engaged in any trade or business in India.
3. The remuneration is not deductible from the income of the employer chargeable under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

Also, low IQ zoomer, read this. Checkmate. Bieber is liable to pay tax in India. 

https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/taxation-of-artists-entertainers-and-sports-persons-37474.asp

 

 

[Chaos]

1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

The cockroach loves lying and getting into arguments even though he knows he is lying. 

that roach wants to interfere…n he met his don.

 

[Muloghonto]

1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

MC ki aaulad.  90 day rule exempts foreign artists from being taxed you filthy SOB.

Khandaani MC, this 90 day excemption does not apply to entertainers, sportsmen and artists. 
 

[rangeelaraja]

2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Khandaani MC, this 90 day excemption does not apply to entertainers, sportsmen and artists. 
 

 

 

MOFU ki aaulad:

 

https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2023/01/TBB-India.pdf

 

 

 

Quote

2.2 Taxability of income Taxation varies based on the residency status of the individual in a FY. • ROR – liable for tax on worldwide income • NOR – liable for tax on income sourced /deemed to source from India or received/deemed to be received in India, or from income derived from a business controlled or set up in India • NR – liable for tax only on income sourced /deemed to source from India or received/deemed to be received in India Foreign nationals may be exempt from tax in India if their stay in India does not exceed 90 days, as prescribed in the Indian domestic law, or the number of days prescribed (generally 183 days) under various double taxation avoidance agreements (DTAA) into which India has entered with other countries / jurisdictions, subject to satisfaction of all other conditions.

 

[Muloghonto]

Just now, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

MOFU ki aaulad:

 

https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2023/01/TBB-India.pdf

 

 

 

 

Khandaani MoFo, does not apply to sportsmen,actors and entertainers.

 

https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/taxation-of-artists-entertainers-and-sports-persons-37474.asp

 

"

Article 17(1) gives taxing rights of income of Artistes and Sportspersons to a country of source. It states that:

• There must be a person who is an Entertainer, Sportsperson, Artiste or a Sportsman.
• Such person is resident of a contracting state.
• Such person exercises the performance in the other contracting state.
• Taxation rights have been given to that other state. (Country where performance takes place).

Let us take an example. The singer Justin Bieber visits India for a performance.

Assuming he is tax residence of USA, USA becomes his country of residence and India becomes his country of source. As per the article, India shall have right to tax Justin Bieber for his performance in India. However, USA may also tax him based on his residency or citizenship. However, USA shall allow him a credit of taxes paid in India as per the relevant article between India-USA tax treaty."

 

 

CHECKMATE.

 

[rangeelaraja]

1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

Khandaani MoFo, does not apply to sportsmen,actors and entertainers.

 

https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/taxation-of-artists-entertainers-and-sports-persons-37474.asp

 

"

Article 17(1) gives taxing rights of income of Artistes and Sportspersons to a country of source. It states that:

• There must be a person who is an Entertainer, Sportsperson, Artiste or a Sportsman.
• Such person is resident of a contracting state.
• Such person exercises the performance in the other contracting state.
• Taxation rights have been given to that other state. (Country where performance takes place).

Let us take an example. The singer Justin Bieber visits India for a performance.

Assuming he is tax residence of USA, USA becomes his country of residence and India becomes his country of source. As per the article, India shall have right to tax Justin Bieber for his performance in India. However, USA may also tax him based on his residency or citizenship. However, USA shall allow him a credit of taxes paid in India as per the relevant article between India-USA tax treaty."

 

 

CHECKMATE.

 

 

 

MOFU ki paidaish,  I am citing KPMG you are citing some flunkie CA blog. 

 

MC ka baccha.

 

 

[Chaos]

2 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

MOFU ki paidaish,  I am citing KPMG you are citing some flunkie CA blog. 

 

MC ka baccha.

 

 

that MC getting owned

[Muloghonto]

Just now, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

MOFU ki paidaish,  I am citing KPMG you are citing some flunkie CA blog. 

 

MC ka baccha.

 

 

Khandaani Mofo, you are citing somethign that has NOTHING TO DO with artists & entertainers taxation act under OECD treaties. The blog is citing the actual act, loser. 

Typical low Iq low sanskaar zoomer. Can't accept being proven wrong even when provedn wrong. 

Your link does NOT talk about entertainers and such. Only regular workers. Again, checkmate. Learn to take the L and move on, kiddo.

 

[Muloghonto]

5 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said:

 

 

MOFU ki paidaish,  I am citing KPMG you are citing some flunkie CA blog. 

 

MC ka baccha.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Chaos said:

that MC getting owned

 

Here you go, zoomer retards. 

Since you lot are too stupid to google properly.

 

https://bcajonline.org/journal/taxation-of-artistes-and-sportsmen/#:~:text=in section 115BB-,Applies only to a non-resident and a person who,return if tax deductible at

 

This is mumbai chartered accountant journal. Focus on the highlighted part. Entertainers who visit India are liable to taxation IN India even when they do not meet the residency requirement.

 

Every foreign performer in India has to pay 20% Income tax and then another 20% remittance tax if they wanna move the money outta India and the amount is greater than a few thousand USD. 

 

CHECKMATE.

 

Edited July 23, 2024 by Muloghonto