Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well revisiting a previous thread: here are the possibilities: 1. Sachin Tendulkar achieves the 97 runs that stand between him and the title of highest run scorer in Test cricket with a brisk half century in the first innings followed up with a promising 30 odd in the second, cut short by a momentary lapse of attention. or he achieves the 97 runs in one since innings: a century highlighted with two sixes over midwicket of off the bowling of Murlitharan; evnetually dismissed by a leg cutter from Chaminda Vaas which on most days, my grandmother would have shoved right back up the tundler's bum in his follow through. 2. Virendra Sehwag leads another blitzkrieg and his fist innings exploits with partner in crime Gautam Gambhir setup an indian victory on the 4th evening or 5th day before tea. 3. Rahul Dravid scores a 50 odd but follows it up with a low score in a very unpromising innings that raises more questions about his place in the side. 4. Sangakara scores a brilliant century that exposes the lack of penetration of Indian bowling on flat wickets. He leads the Sri Lankan batting to a high scoring draw that is acknowledged by everyone as a pathetic display of unsporting cricket on part of Sri Lanka for preparing a wicket so 'flaccid' that even an intravenous injection of Viagra cannot induce a desirable response. 5. Natalie Portman dumps her bum of a boy friend, finally discovering that Devendra Banhart's music has the same charm and enthusiasm as low grade ganja acquired from some bird brain rastafarians (who smoked the good stuff themselves); and gives me a call. Place your bets.

Posted

my bad... i thought it was virendra not virender... i ll be careful in the future. @ zubin... had it not been my dependence upon your for links to watch matches, i would give you a fitting reply for your vituperations against a woman who is complete: intelligent, and beautiful.

Posted
How about; 6) THX_1138 learns how to spell Virender Sehwag's name correctly. ...possible it may be, but i still wouldn't bet on it.
..maybe he is a fan of dhamendra
Posted
here are the possibilities: 5. Natalie Portman dumps her bum of a boy friend, finally discovering that Devendra Banhart's music has the same charm and enthusiasm as low grade ganja acquired from some bird brain rastafarians (who smoked the good stuff themselves); and gives me a call. Place your bets.
6. Mention of Natalie Portman shall duly make me bump up the tharki thread with a new picture....
Posted
my bad... i thought it was virendra not virender... i ll be careful in the future. @ zubin... had it not been my dependence upon your for links to watch matches, i would give you a fitting reply for your vituperations against a woman who is complete: intelligent, and beautiful.
haha dont chicken out.. i wud still give u links if i have.... I dont have anything against her.. xxxxxxxxxxx
Posted
haha dont chicken out.. i wud still give u links if i have.... I dont have anything against her.. if given a chance, i wud bang her though... :D
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx besides my attraction to her is not sexual. somehow i cannot bring myself to view her with that perspective.
Posted
i am sure she is yearning to bang you too. besides my attraction to her is not sexual. somehow i cannot bring myself to view her with that perspective.
Good on you. Bhabhi ko aisa hi najron se dekhna chahiye.
Posted
i am sure she is yearning to bang you too. besides my attraction to her is not sexual. somehow i cannot bring myself to view her with that perspective.
umm some serious crush eeh....
Posted
haha dont chicken out.. i wud still give u links if i have.... I dont have anything against her.. :D
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
×
×
  • Create New...