bharat297 Posted November 1, 2008 Posted November 1, 2008 And we reckon the Poms are whingers. You blokes take the cake. :regular_smile: :hysterical: Yep we're the whingers ... Hahahaha. You Aussie supporters really do live with your own little in your own little world filled with delusions dont you ... This year alone the Aussie players or media have complained about: * Harbhajan not getting suspended for calling Symonds a monkey (despite no proof of that) * The judge in charge being a New Zealander. * BCCI Power * Hayden getting fined for calling Bhajji an "obnoxiuos weed" * Harbhajan not getting suspended for scratching himself * Zaheer Khans actions in Mohali * MS Dhoni claiming a catch off a bounce (despite the fact he asked for a replay) * SG Balls being similar in structure to the Duke Balls used in England (where reverse swing was also a factor) * Pitch in Delhi being suited for spin deliberately to play Australia out of the series. This is just this year against India. Not to mention the history you guys have of whinging about various things such as ... Murali's action, Shoaib's action, Englands reverse swing, South Africa's sledging and crowds, England fielding RSA born players (KP), Indian crowds and pitches, Shoaib/Asif getting away without a drug ban, Indias T20 celebrations You can say what you want but the cricket world will always know that the Aussies are the real whingers.
bharat297 Posted November 1, 2008 Posted November 1, 2008 :hysterical: Sorry I still cant get over how rich it is that the Aussies are turning around and calling us whingers
Dinx - the Jinx Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 ^ dint see this on Tv. Was it not out?
fineleg Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 it was *not* clearly decisive. There was doubt, ball was possibly missing leg stump or maybe hitting outside of leg stump. enough doubt, but bowden gave it out.
Lord Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 billy doesnt deserve to be elite 1.gives clarke not out when he s plumb,gave vijay n katich out when it was lot of doubt. 2.stops dhoni from keeping at leg stump 3.doesnt take any action on ball tampering by aussies.infact stops dar from doing that 4.in delhi in bizzare piece of umpiring,gives a dead ball saying laxy ran onto wicket,wen he didnt 5.i remember it was him who gave sehwag out in 2004 in blore off a huge inside edge 6.counts 5-ball overs regularly n many more incidents this guy is so incompetent n doesnt desrve to umpire in test matches imo,let alone be in elite panel.hes a clown ,so ipl n t20 cricket is wat he should stick to
Lord Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 Aussie umpire Simon Taufel is the best. billy the worst
Sachinism Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 Lax did run on the pitch, plus that pitch was looking like crap, Lax may have come close to the danger area before and then when he did it again a dead ball was called, no biggie
Lord Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 Lax did run on the pitch' date=' plus that pitch was looking like crap, Lax may have come close to the danger area before and then when he did it again a dead ball was called, no biggie[/quote'] but i think he was interrupted by the bowler n had to change his direction n hence ran onto the pitch.it wasnt intentional,i remember him arguing with silly billy.
CSK Fan Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 2.stops dhoni from keeping at leg stump There were already two fielders off square on the leg side. the rule says, only two can be behind square on leg, Dhoni would have made 3. 3.doesnt take any action on ball tampering by aussies.infact stops dar from doing that Cleaning of hte ball has to be done before umpire only if the seam is being cleaned which was not the case here 4.in delhi in bizzare piece of umpiring,gives a dead ball saying laxy ran onto wicket,wen he didnt He did too I personally believe he is one of the better umpires out there
cowboysfan Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 I like billy-he is fun and fair and thats important.
h4te Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 FAIL! The rule states only two BESIDES the wicket-keeper....
bharat297 Posted November 11, 2008 Posted November 11, 2008 Yep from what Ive seen Simon Taufell is the best umpire going around. Aleem Dar is sometimes very good and sometimes very bad. The rest are not really worth mentioning.
gs Posted November 12, 2008 Posted November 12, 2008 Yep from what Ive seen Simon Taufell is the best umpire going around. Aleem Dar is sometimes very good and sometimes very bad. The rest are not really worth mentioning. Aleem Dar is consistent with his mistakes! So it hurts both teams equally, might sound illogical but it evens out umpiring errors. :--D
Dinx - the Jinx Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 When was the last time we had an Indian umpire on the Elite panel list officiating in a Test? Why is it that there are currently no indian umpires on this list (tests)? What are the criteria determining who makes this list? Earlier I was aware that each country nominates 2 umpires to the panel and later on that practice was stopped. What is it now?
King Tendulkar Posted November 16, 2008 Author Posted November 16, 2008 When was the last time we had an Indian umpire on the Elite panel list officiating in a Test? Why is it that there are currently no indian umpires on this list (tests)? What are the criteria determining who makes this list? Earlier I was aware that each country nominates 2 umpires to the panel and later on that practice was stopped. What is it now? Racism is the reason why we have no umpires on the elite panel. Whys so many aussies. ICC frightened of BCCI even in respect of umpires
cowboysfan Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 Racism is the reason why we have no umpires on the elite panel. Whys so many aussies. ICC frightened of BCCI even in respect of umpires no it isnt .indian umpires just suck.either BCCI doesnt care to promote some good umpires or there are no good umpires who can be considered for international duty.
King Tendulkar Posted November 16, 2008 Author Posted November 16, 2008 no it isnt .indian umpires just suck.either BCCI doesnt care to promote some good umpires or there are no good umpires who can be considered for international duty. What evidence do you have that our top umpires suck? Give some detailed analysis of our umpires and how they suck compared to Bowden, Hair and Harper. Any more sterotypes of indians that you want to reinforce, maybe you think indians can't be trusted and the whiteys are the only ones who can't be trusted. Come on give us analysis on our sucky umpires compared to aussie umpies and co. I guarantee you can't are just spouting sterotyped bull.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now