zubinpepsi Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 I vote for England.. they r a pathetic bunch not fit to play ODIs.. Vote away your choice.. Note: I dint include Ind, Aus, Saf as they r the top 3 sides well above the rest... I dint include pakistan and zimbawe as they r not playing competitive cricket anymore.. :giggle: Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted March 22, 2009 Author Share Posted March 22, 2009 oh shyte.. how did i forget... Ravi , can u pls add pakistan? Thanks Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted March 22, 2009 Author Share Posted March 22, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Anakin Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 ^they don't play :haha::haha: Link to comment
King Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 They don't need to be added, no one cares. :winky: Link to comment
h4te Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 Pakistan, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and Kenya need to play in their own league. They just drag on in any series they're involved in. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted March 22, 2009 Author Share Posted March 22, 2009 I have edited the OP.. :giggle: Link to comment
King Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 I have edited the OP.. :giggle: You have done a favour to Pakistan anyways and saved a few votes against them. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 England definitely is the weakest team given that they play all forms of cricket on consistent basis. They're middle order is fragile and bowling department has been toothless. I am still not able to comprehend with their selection policy when it comes to Harmisson. They got lucky in the first ODI or else their losing streak in ODI's would have been 7. Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 i have voted england for boring me to death -they should not be allowed to play limited overs cricket-they are interested in only the Ashes anyway. Link to comment
THX_1138 Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 its a straight shootout for gold (no silver or bronze in this title) between pakistan, england and bangladesh... Link to comment
avengers Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 oh shyte.. how did i forget... Ravi , can u pls add pakistan? Thanks :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 As much as I hate them, Pakistan are not that bad in ODIs, especially against us. BD is clearly the worst team, England comes in next, WI,Pak,NZ and Lanka form 2nd tier below Ind,SA,Aus. Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 england play odis like everybody did in the last decade.they dont seem to know the concept of acceleration during the powerplays.they will not improve until they get rid of the test players in the team. Link to comment
graphic23 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Didn't Sri Lanka beat us in the Asia Cup? They've won the Asia Cup several times before. I don't consider them a weak team at all. New Zealand are a terrific ODI outfit - not sure what you're getting at here. Bangladesh can be a good team if they were about 20% consistent. They have some really good players but carry a lot of people who can't play well at all. This leaves WI and England. WI have players who can hit the big shots, and play quickly and have a decent bowling line-up. England has Kevin Pietersen and... no one else. Their bowling line-up has Steve Harmison, who cancels the other 10 players out. So England has to be the worst ODI team out there. Link to comment
Ram Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 From all the mainstream teams, it HAS to be England. They have hardly anyone whom you can call an international ODI class player, except for Pietersen and maybe Flintoff. Individually, when you look at their players, they arent that bad. But somehow, they dont seem to have the chemistry that makes good ODI teams. And to make matters worse, things just got worse for them with Strauss becoming ODI captain. There is no way Strauss is an ODI player. He has been awesome test form, but there is absolutely no place for him in the ODI team. Look at India's performance after they jettisoned guys like Ganguly and Dravid from the ODI teams.. Since then, we've hardly put a foot wrong. Incredibly, Eng is just repeating the mistakes of the past. Their team shouldered the burden of a Michal Vaughan, a proven failure in ODI cricket, just because he was captain. Their performance suffered because of that. Now, they're making the same mistakes.. Link to comment
Pak_Forever Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 where's India? :icflove: jokes...it's gotta be England, and I believe we are talking about the men team and not women. Link to comment
Kohum Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 where's India? :icflove: Up Here , Up here Paki boy @ no 3. :--D and I ain't kidding :--D:--D Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now