bunny Posted May 13, 2009 Posted May 13, 2009 Here are the stats of the Indian bowlers in death overs: RPS: 72 runs/10 over : 7.2 Nehra: 96/13 : 7.4 Zak: 44/5 : 8.8 IP : 141/15 : 9.4 IS: 81/8 : 10.1 PK: 82/8 : 10.2 MP: 71/6 : 11.8 Although RPS has done well, one thing to note is that in many innings he was bowling at tailenders (Ojha having already captured the main wickets). Still RPS and Nehra deserve special praise. Bowling in death overs might be India's weak-link in the T20 World Cup.
cowboysfan Posted May 13, 2009 Posted May 13, 2009 it has to be pointed out that both PK and IS economy is high in the death overs because of their respective teams inability to get early wickets-hence they are both facing the opposing teams best batsmen in the death overs and any bowler will go for a lot in those conditions,In the t20 world cup i would like PK to bowl out his 4 overs early when the ball is swinging around.
bunny Posted May 13, 2009 Author Posted May 13, 2009 Malinga:83/14: 5.9 Fidel: 93/10: 9.3 Nannes: 95/11: 8.6
Ram Posted May 13, 2009 Posted May 13, 2009 Nehra has actually looked quite good in this tournament. He runs in hard and moves the ball just enough to trouble the batsman. If they can pick Balaji or Praveen Kumar, I dont see why they should not pick Nehra.
bunny Posted May 13, 2009 Author Posted May 13, 2009 it has to be pointed out that both PK and IS economy is high in the death overs because of their respective teams inability to get early wickets-hence they are both facing the opposing teams best batsmen in the death overs and any bowler will go for a lot in those conditions' date='In the t20 world cup i would like PK to bowl out his 4 overs early when the ball is swinging around.[/quote'] I agree with that...But still you have to prepare for the worst, and probably that means selecting RPS and 2 of Zak/Ishant/PK (+ Bhajji, Ojha)...I dont think IP is an option as of now.
The Outsider Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 I agree with that...But still you have to prepare for the worst' date=' and probably that means selecting RPS and 2 of Zak/Ishant/PK (+ Bhajji, Ojha)...I dont think IP is an option as of now.[/quote'] Not as a death bowler but in English conditions and as an all rounder, I would play Pathan in all matches.
bunny Posted May 14, 2009 Author Posted May 14, 2009 Not as a death bowler but in English conditions and as an all rounder' date=' I would play Pathan in all matches.[/quote'] Would you play play Yusuf too? I think the team will have to choose between one of the two. I think English pitches have gone flat over the years, but I am not sure what happens at this time of the year.
Lord Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 I agree with that...But still you have to prepare for the worst' date=' and probably that means selecting RPS and 2 of Zak/Ishant/PK (+ Bhajji, Ojha)...I dont think IP is an option as of now.[/quote'] why not ?his econ. is better than IS,PK n MP, n also taken 15 wickets,plus he can bat well.he goota be picked ahead of ishant atleast
Chandan Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 What do you call death overs in a T20 match? And why isn't it worth discussing what the stats of bowlers are in first 6 overs when the field restriction is on?
zaheer Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 Below are the list of the bowlers who have bowled the most no. of dot balls
Jasoos Posted May 14, 2009 Posted May 14, 2009 IKP has swung it in during some matches. If the conditions are good and he can maintain his line then hes a must in English conditions. On flat wickets and small grounds he will just be cannon fodder. But but but i suggest we pick Shoaib Maqsusi. :winky:
Recommended Posts