Rightarmfast Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 /\ Since Shoaib says, hence Zahid was fast ? Hmm, Havent seen any interview of Shoaib ever stating that.Btw,Eddie Smith and Alastair Campbell maintain Srinath was faster than Waqar and Donald.Although that only lasted for about 2-3 yrs ...Whats your take on that ?
Cricket Tragic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Sami was quick at the start of his career. Zahid also had pace but it's overstated by the Pakistan fans.
ganeshran Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Sami was quick at the start of his career. Zahid also had pace but it's overstated by the Pakistan fans. Sami is quick even now. He never had any sense of control though
Cricket Tragic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Sami is quick even now. He never had any sense of control though There was a debate before my post about whether Sami was quick at the start of his career.
ganeshran Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 There was a debate before my post about whether Sami was quick at the start of his career. oh ok
Trichromatic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Sami was quick at the start of his career. Zahid also had pace but it's overstated by the Pakistan fans. Did he start playing against second string NZ team? He was bowling around 90 mph then.
Cricket Tragic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Did he start playing against second string NZ team? He was bowling around 90 mph then. It was NZ but it was their full strength team.
Trichromatic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 It was NZ but it was their full strength team. I remember those ODI matches when NZ had lot of new players due to some problem and NZ lost all matches. Hamish Marshall scored century in one match.
Sid Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 I remember those ODI matches when NZ had lot of new players due to some problem and NZ lost all matches. Hamish Marshall scored century in one match. He debuted in 2001 against Kiwis in NZ ,youre takling about 2003 NZ tour of Pak.During that 2001 tour,Imran Khan compared him to Marshall and he still maintains that
Trichromatic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 He debuted in 2001 against Kiwis in NZ ' date='youre takling about 2003 NZ tour of Pak.During that 2001 tour,Imran Khan compared him to Marshall and he still maintains that [/quote']
Cricket Tragic Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 He debuted in 2001 against Kiwis in NZ ' date='youre takling about 2003 NZ tour of Pak.During that 2001 tour,Imran Khan compared him to Marshall and he still maintains that [/quote'] Correct :two_thumbs_up:
Hur Rizvi Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 / Since Shoaib says' date=' hence Zahid was fast ? Hmm, Havent seen any interview of Shoaib ever stating that.Btw,Eddie Smith and Alastair Campbell maintain Srinath was faster than Waqar and Donald.Although that only lasted for about 2-3 yrs ...Whats your take on that ?[/quote'] I really dont know what eddie smith and Chambell said about srinath... Srinath may have been quicker than waqar for some period after 96 when waqar returned after a back injury. From 89-95 waqar was the quickest bowler in the word.. Zahid was quick coz there is a video of 2003 where he bowled 140+ against S.A on his comeback and that is after he didnt play any cricket or very little cricket due to severe back injury
Hur Rizvi Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 I remember those ODI matches when NZ had lot of new players due to some problem and NZ lost all matches. Hamish Marshall scored century in one match. I was talking about his debut series in 2001 in NZ Sami confused everyone in that tour of 2001 he was swinging the ball at pace b/w 140-150 consistently and that at only 19 years of age.. but somehow never developed maturity to perform at international level despite having a great action,pace etc...
MCcricket Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 INDIA HAS THE FASTEST BOWLER IN THIS WORLD, ATUL SHARMA ONLY HE DOESN'T PLAY CRICKET LOL , jokes apart Varun , Umesh , Shukla, Ishant four bowlers who can bowl 150 k's, now if they grow as bowlers India will have a fast lethal combo.
express bowling Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 I really dont know what eddie smith and Chambell said about srinath... Srinath may have been quicker than waqar for some period after 96 when waqar returned after a back injury. From 89-95 waqar was the quickest bowler in the word.. Zahid was quick coz there is a video of 2003 where he bowled 140+ against S.A on his comeback and that is after he didnt play any cricket or very little cricket due to severe back injury That is true. Upto 1994 or so Waqar was really quick and faster than others. Srinath was quicker than others in 1995 and 1996. Mohmd Zahid was perhaps quick for a very short period of time. Not really impressive but there was a Pakistani bowler named Mohmd. Akram who looked really sharp. He bowled mostly during the pre speed gun days. He was a good bowler too but somehow did not play much.
Hur Rizvi Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 That is true. Upto 1994 or so Waqar was really quick and faster than others. Srinath was quicker than others in 1995 and 1996. Mohmd Zahid was perhaps quick for a very short period of time. Not really impressive but there was a Pakistani bowler named Mohmd. Akram who looked really sharp. He bowled mostly during the pre speed gun days. He was a good bowler too but somehow did not play much. yes you may be true in your assessment of srinath... Muhammad Akram was quite nippy though he was not a genuine fast bowler like wAQAR,SHOAIB , DONALD OR LEE... he was more wahab riaz,yadav or Aaron in terms of pace
bajrang Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 / Since Shoaib says' date= hence Zahid was fast ? Hmm, Havent seen any interview of Shoaib ever stating that.Btw,Eddie Smith and Alastair Campbell maintain Srinath was faster than Waqar and Donald.Although that only lasted for about 2-3 yrs ...Whats your take on that ? in rameez raja's show "rameez lounge" with shoiab akhtar. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ramiz+lounge+shoaib+akhtar+&oq=rameez+lounge+&aq=2s&aqi=g-s8&aql=&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=10723l12946l0l14290l7l7l0l0l0l0l319l1767l0.1.5.1l7l0 dont know which part but he mention it in this show. he also say things about sharukh saurav and indians that are completely opposite to his book.
Stuge Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 Till mrf pace academy is officially called as slow academy
express bowling Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 yes you may be true in your assessment of srinath... Muhammad Akram was quite nippy though he was not a genuine fast bowler like wAQAR,SHOAIB , DONALD OR LEE... he was more wahab riaz,yadav or Aaron in terms of pace I am not sure Donald was as quick as Shoaib or Lee. He was just fast, maybe 140 k to 150 k, not 145 k to 156 k like Shoiab or Lee. He may have looked quicker because of the super bouncy pitches he bowled on. Waqar was also mostly fast and never as quick as Shoaib, who I think is the fastest bowler to have ever bowled in international cricket if you consider the length of time he was super quick especially in test matches.
Rightarmfast Posted November 20, 2011 Posted November 20, 2011 I really dont know what eddie smith and Chambell said about srinath... Srinath may have been quicker than waqar for some period after 96 when waqar returned after a back injury. From 89-95 waqar was the quickest bowler in the word.. Zahid was quick coz there is a video of 2003 where he bowled 140+ against S.A on his comeback and that is after he didnt play any cricket or very little cricket due to severe back injury Hahaha ! Typical ! Btw, I watched Zahid in his younger days and he was far from being quick. He was just an alright bowler. Nothing special. Coming back to Donald, 'Express Bowling' is right. Donald was not 150-160 kph bowler. He was hyped, just like how ppl hype Waqar's pace. In a nutshell, Waqar was not as fast as Shoaib.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now