Zap_Brannigan Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 IF his batsmen had not played like nutjobs in the 1st innings' date=' his decision would've been called confident and solid :two_thumbs_up:[/quote'] Sure. In Headingly, India did exactly that. India did that to put pressure on England by making a huge 1st innings score. But here, the pitch eased out much faster and a huge total wasnt really needed against Pak with Aus bowling line up.
Sooda Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Not to mention the fact that they were facing Asif in these conditions whilst we had to deal with Hoggard and Caddick, who are ok- certainly were a handy lot then- but nothing more Moreover we had the holy trinity. Its ok to bat first on a wicket like this when its Langer and Hayden opening, but not a make shift allrounder and another guy in his 5th test or something.
Sachinism Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Not to mention the fact that they were facing Asif in these conditions whilst we had to deal with Hoggard and Caddick, who are ok- certainly were a handy lot then- but nothing more Moreover we had the holy trinity. Its ok to bat first on a wicket like this when its Langer and Hayden opening, but not a make shift allrounder and another guy in his 5th test or something. Hoggard and Caddick in seaming/swinging conditions are a handful
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now