Parth Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent.
Chaos Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent. dude please dont make curse at u man. Prove your sh^T before u post some thing like this. It's facking annoying to read ur posts.
Guest dada_rocks Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent. I am not sure u know what consistent means
Dhondy Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Thanks for the heads-up, DR. Bumps, do you have a single SD for all the innings played by Lara & Sachin? Can we compute a SEM on that?
veer Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent. I am not sure u know what consistent means parth is 13 yrs old.. and SRT been playing for more than 17 years.. pardon his ignorance.. :hic:
Bumper Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Thanks for the heads-up, DR. Bumps, do you have a single SD for all the innings played by Lara & Sachin? Can we compute a SEM on that? Dhondy i lost interest in it a bit, after seeing the results of my computation. Everyone knows ( & i can see it too) that SRT's numbers seem far more consistent. But yet his std deviation seems more. Perhaps what i should do is, take cumulative averages for each year & do std deviation on it. Thats a very time consuming exercise. Am not sure i understand how to come up with ONE SD ? Do u have any thoughts on how that could be computed ? But i can compute SEM tho. Will do it tonite.
Chaos Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent. I am not sure u know what consistent means parth is 13 yrs old.. and SRT been playing for more than 17 years.. pardon his ignorance.. :hic: Parth, i will tell u a bed time story now: Long time ago, during one hell of dusty afternoon, there is one young bloke called "sir sachin ramesh tendulkar", you were 3.5 years old. We saw a miracle that no other cricketer has done. TO BE CONTINUED.... (after ur next troll on sachin)
Holysmoke Posted April 23, 2007 Author Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Edited. :eew:
Chaos Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? holysmoke damn it, edit ur date lol, i wanna quiz him :eew:
Dhondy Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Just do it the way you did the annual SDs, Bumps. Input all the 200 or so innings on a scientific calculator, or one of the pages on the net that do it for you. We have the overall mean. We need an overall SD, and preferably a SEM from that.
King Tendulkar Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Lara is the better batsmen and the more sonsistent, he was amazing, the 400 and 375 he scored were absoulutley brilliant. He has the most runs in tests and obviousley he is the better batsmen and the most consistent. How the hell do you know??? You were about 7 years old when he played those knocks!
beetle Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Bache ko maaroge kya? :shrug:
Gambit Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Some stats from the C4 cricket forum. BCL / SRT home avg - 58.65 / 55.24 away avg - 47.80 / 54.25 1st inn avg - 63.94 / 55.24 2nd inn avg - 38.18 / 43.95 live match avg - 36.51 / 60.59 dead rubber avg - 79.97 / 55.42 avg in australia - 41.97 / 54.15 avg in series won - 58.46 / 71.54 vs aus AWAY: SRT: 51.87 ; BCL: 41.97 vs aus at home: SRT: 54.15 ; BCL: 66.04 vs aus in live matches: SRT: 52.70 ; BCL: 48.38 vs aus in dead matches: SRT: 54.50 ; BCL: 64.67 vs aus AWAY in live matches: SRT: 57.40 ; BCL: 35.00 vs aus AWAY in dead matches: SRT: 42.00 ; BCL: 75.67 vs aus at home in live matches: SRT: 46.83 ; BCL: 66.26 vs aus at home in dead matches: SRT: 67.00 ; BCL: 64.00 Overall vs Australia SRT: 1859 @ 53.11 BCL: 2815 @ 52.12 Vs Australia with at least one of Warne or Mcgrath SRT: 1279 @ 53.29 BCL: 2408 @ 50.17 Vs Australia with both Warne and Mcgrath playing together SRT: 592 @ 42.29 BCL: 1388 @ 53.38 Vs Australia with only Mcgrath playing SRT: 70 @ 17.5 (only 2 tests) BCL: 612 @ 38.25 Vs Australia with only Warne playing SRT: 617 @ 102.83 BCL: 408 @ 68.00 Note: SRT has faced McWarne in only two full series. MOS in one and avg of 50 in the other.
King Tendulkar Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? King Sachin rapes lara with those stats. Great post Gambit :wtg: Nice to put facts forward instead of relying on myths and legends.
Chaos Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? i love u dsr, atleast one guy with same thoughts :hic:
King Tendulkar Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? i love u dsr' date=' atleast one guy with same thoughts :hic:[/quote'] :wtg: I love Sachin more :hic: Gambits post should be in hall of fame. It should also be brought up everytime an anti sachin thread pops up. It should also be posted to all those idiot journos around the world so they can realise who is the greatest. I have heard some idiotic statements from journos/comms in last week or so eg Lara was the best as he did it against the aussies. These stats show Sachin was the master of the best bowling attack of our time not Lara.
DesiChap Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Gambo :wtg: :wtg: :wtg: This should shut the naysaysers. Oh wait they will still look for reasons oh and dont they say "statistics do lie" Hell no nmatter what Sachin does he cant win :shrug:
Predator_05 Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Tendulkar, by far. From 1997-2002, nobody scored more. Lara is the kind of batsman who could go several innings without doing anything, and then come to life in one big innings when you wouldn't expect it. A bit like Tendulkar is now.
Anakin Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Gambo you rock dude :wtg: King of dead rubbers is supposed to better at handling pressure BTW if McWarne combination was in the 99 series, IIRC Tendu got out about half the times by the (ch)umps.
Chandan Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 Re: Who was more consistent ? Some stats from the C4 cricket forum. . Hey Gambit, you've put the stats compiled by Ash and Salim there. By the way, what is your id there?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now