patriot Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 ...if Aussie innings is terminated at this point 234/4 in 42.3 overs . Any one with D/L table ?
Shehezaada Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 http://www.duckworth-lewis.com/CalculatorforT20ODI/tabid/56/language/en-US/Default.aspx according to this...somewhere in the 160-165 range. This game reminds me of the one in 2006 at KL. Aussies posted a good total, and then rain came...we started off well but then lost 4 wickets, then the rain came and saved us again!
Sachinism Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 Someone work out the total for 50 overs and then we can work back as we lose more overs
patriot Posted September 28, 2009 Author Posted September 28, 2009 With 10 wickets in hand 160 ish in 20 overs - it should be gettable. Hopefully someone will play a match winning blinder like that English guy did yesterday.
patriot Posted September 28, 2009 Author Posted September 28, 2009 Now how we wish Yousuf Pathan was in the XI..he couldnt have done worse than Ishant --- and he's a 20 over specialist.
The Outsider Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 Any truncated target will favor India because we are one batsman short. There was no way in hell we were going to chase down 300 with 6 batsmen - 160 off 20 overs is very possible with the likes of Tendulkar, Gambhir, and Raina and 8 power play overs.
Dinx - the Jinx Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 Now how we wish Yousuf Pathan was in the XI..he couldnt have done worse than Ishant --- and he's a 20 over specialist. can we have the super sub rule :--D
Celeste Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 can we have the super sub rule :--D ICC should re introduce this rule in 20/20s.
Zelig Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 If Australia's innings ends now' date=' India's target in 42 overs is 263. If its reduced to 20 overs then 153[/quote']
Shehezaada Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 we can definitely do 153...a good opening stand and we'll be through.
Dinx - the Jinx Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 till wat time should it rain so that we play only 20 oves?
Desi Cartman Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 SRT will refuse to bat since he has retired from 20-20 Int cricket
The Outsider Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 If Australia do not bat again then India to win will need : 1. 172 off 20 overs 2. 202 off 25 overs 3. 228 off 30 overs 4. 247 off 35 overs 5. 262 off 40 overs 6. 276 off 45 overs 7. 288 off 50 overs.
patriot Posted September 28, 2009 Author Posted September 28, 2009 The way its pouring ..we would be lucky to complete a game. 153 in 20 overs with 10 wickets in hand - a semi-final spot at stake. Bhagwan is trying to help us ..unless we decide to **** ourselves, we should get over this.
Dirty_South Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 SRT will refuse to bat since he has retired from 20-20 Int cricket :--D
patriot Posted September 28, 2009 Author Posted September 28, 2009 till wat time should it rain so that we play only 20 oves? I think its the match referees call. 172/20 overs as Shwetabh put it sounds daunting never the less - espeically without Yousuf Pathan.
Zelig Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 WTF? CI has deleted that D/L target score. Maybe it is not 153:dontknow:
jf1gp_1 Posted September 28, 2009 Posted September 28, 2009 If Australia do not bat again then India to win will need : 1. 172 off 20 overs 2. 202 off 25 overs 3. 228 off 30 overs 4. 247 off 35 overs 5. 262 off 40 overs 6. 276 off 45 overs 7. 288 off 50 overs. nothing looks good except 50 over
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now