Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
that's been on my amazon wishlist for almost a year now!
I'll have to get another copy. The one I have is a gift for my sis. It is proving to be engrossing.
Posted
the King one? very good!
yes.. Colleugues recomended long time back... but seeing the size of book i hesitated Now reading in iPad :winky:
Posted

Ask the Dust by John Fante. the first page has a review by New York Times that goes: Either the work of John Fante is unknown to you or it is unforgettable. He was not the kind of writer to leave room in between. hmm..

Posted

Just traveled back to US yesterday, and picked up "The emperor of all maladies" at the IGI. It is 600 pages and I never thought I would even read half of it. But i was hooked and finished 450 pages inflight. The book is the biography of cancer, and quite simply, one of the best books I have read, from a very interesting doctor-writer, who also happens to be a desi. Pulitzer prize nonfiction 2010 too.

Posted
why do people read fiction when they can just watch movies or go to a play? serious question.
You get to write the screenplay in your head. :hatsoff:
Posted
You get to write the screenplay in your head. :hatsoff:
I asked this question to a different person and got a reply that it is a vocabulary enhancer and it makes sense because while preparing for GRE, it was a humbling experience how limited my vocab really is. I mean outside of reading the required shakespeare's works and few other fictional works for english class in high school, I have never touched a novel. That is the only plausible reason for a casual reader, as far as I'm concerned.
Posted

Any one read this new poverty porn that everyone is raving about Katherine Boo’s ‘Behind the Beautiful Forevers' Some of the excerpts selected by the great Pankaj Mishra in his NYTimes review

Many of the slum dwellers, including Abdul, gain their sense of upward mobility by contrasting their lot with that of their less fortunate neighbors, “miserable souls” who “trapped rats and frogs and fried them for dinner” or “ate the scrub grass at the sewage lake’s edge.” Migrants fleeing a crisis-ridden agricultural sector cause an oversupply of cheap labor in Mumbai, so the boy whose hand is sliced off by a shredding machine turns, “with his blood-spurting stump,” to assure his boss that he won’t report the accident. A 2-year-old girl drowns suspiciously in a pail, and a father empties a pot of boiling lentils over his sick baby. As Boo explains, “sickly children of both sexes were sometimes done away with, because of the ruinous cost of their care.” “Young girls in the slums,” she adds, “died all the time under dubious circumstances, since most slum families couldn’t afford the sonograms that allowed wealthier families to dispose of their female liabilities before birth.” Adults, too, drop like flies. One of Abdul’s friends ends up as a corpse with his eyes gouged out. Injured men bleed to death, unattended, by the road to the airport. Maggots breed in the infected sores of the scavengers Boo hangs out with. “Gangrene inched up fingers, calves swelled into tree trunks, and Abdul and his younger brothers kept a running wager about which of the scavengers would be the next to die.”
Posted
I asked this question to a different person and got a reply that it is a vocabulary enhancer and it makes sense because while preparing for GRE, it was a humbling experience how limited my vocab really is. I mean outside of reading the required shakespeare's works and few other fictional works for english class in high school, I have never touched a novel. That is the only plausible reason for a casual reader, as far as I'm concerned.
Dude you have no idea what you are missing. No amount of plays or movies can equal the experience of reading a good fiction book. The mind is an amazing thing and reading a book is on a different level than movies or plays
Posted
Dude you have no idea what you are missing. No amount of plays or movies can equal the experience of reading a good fiction book. The mind is an amazing thing and reading a book is on a different level than movies or plays
+1 Some books like Harry potter , LOTR etc are equal good in movies also if made well because you can see things... But i think the best thing about reading a Good book is Visualising things...i think its difficult to beat that
Posted
+1 Some books like Harry potter , LOTR etc are equal good in movies also if made well because you can see things... But i think the best thing about reading a Good book is Visualising things...i think its difficult to beat that
Agreed. In fact if you are reading a book and you're unable to visualize what you are reading then it means it a badly written book.
×
×
  • Create New...