Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 BTW the stats posted by transparent are epic :fail:. The guy is counting 2 innings of one test as two losses. OMG. Such people really walk amongst us. clicked on the wrong option...:sniffle: any ways...back to topic Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 but that doesn't prove that Tests are more popular than T20s ...does it? It doesn't prove that. But it proves you are a cricket illiterate and your opinions are garbage. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 India 424 123.2 3.43 424 1 lost v Australia Bangalore 25 Mar 1998 investigate this query India 169 61.0 2.77 193 3 lost v Australia Bangalore 25 Mar 1998 investigate this query India 285 113.4 2.50 -156 2 lost v Australia Adelaide 10 Dec 1999 investigate this query India 110 38.1 2.88 -285 4 lost v Australia Adelaide 10 Dec 1999 investigate this query India 238 76.1 3.12 -167 2 lost v Australia Melbourne 26 Dec 1999 investigate this query India 195 89.3 2.17 -180 4 lost v Australia Melbourne 26 Dec 1999 investigate this query India 150 67.5 2.21 150 1 lost v Australia Sydney 2 Jan 2000 investigate this query India 261 58.0 4.50 -141 3 lost v Australia Sydney 2 Jan 2000 investigate this query India 176 71.3 2.46 176 1 lost v Australia Mumbai 27 Feb 2001 investigate this query India 219 94.1 2.32 46 3 lost v Australia Mumbai 27 Feb 2001 investigate this query 10 lost matches in a row And another one!! :hysterical::hysterical: This guy is a laugh riot! Link to comment
Gambit Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 but that doesn't prove that Tests are more popular than T20s ...does it? I don't even want to get into such a discussion given your evident grasp of the subject. I merely wanted to point out Pakistan's inability to beat us in a test series for 19 years. Link to comment
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 India is number one atm and That's great but T20 are the future and India must not fall behind Link to comment
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 And another one!! :hysterical::hysterical: This guy is a laugh riot! and you are dumb f*** that can't define the word he has used multiple times :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Karan114 Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 any ways, why the f*** am i talking about pakistan and australia? After realizing the bitter truth of how Australia has biaatch slapped poyzzz over the last 15 years, our paki troll suddenly starts questioning why we are talking about poyzzz and aussies :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Celeste Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Played two' date=' won one each. But since when has facts stopped your nation from claiming anything? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:[/quote'] :whine: Link to comment
Gambit Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 1999 :hatsoff: Bilateral series tied 1-1. :hatsoff: Poor Waqar/Shoaib/Anwar/Saqi/Ducky bhais retired without ever winning a test series against India. :sniffle: Link to comment
Mr. Wicket Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Woooooaaaah my gaaaawd. :rotfl: I have just read through the last 5 minutes of this thread. transparent, thank you for this hilarious display of epic self-pwnage that has just about made my day, between your statistical mastery and familiarity with the dictionary. Wow. Seriously, WOW! This is ****ing hilarious. :rotfl: Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 After realizing the bitter truth of how Australia has biaatch slapped poyzzz over the last 15 years' date=' our paki troll suddenly starts questioning why we are talking about poyzzz and aussies :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:[/quote'] In Ramiz Raja's words "We derailed him" :hysterical: Link to comment
Jersey #10 Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 I want to pull out the table with all time W/L ratios but I won't Link to comment
Mr. Wicket Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 I want to pull out the table with all time W/L ratios but I won't Why? What significance does that statistic have in this argument? Link to comment
Gambit Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 I want to pull out the table with all time W/L ratios but I won't Please spare us. Given your maths skills, I won't be surprised if you are paying double for everything..from house rent to The Afretard's guide to T20 DVDs. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Please spare us. Given your maths skills' date=' I won't be surprised if you are paying double for everything..from house rent to The Afretard's guide to T20 DVDs.[/quote'] :hysterical: Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Win loss ratio is a typical talking point of a padosi :haha: Link to comment
Fontaine Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Another self pwnage of halaal quality. Can't even count!! :hysterical::hysterical: Holy ****!!! :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
The Outsider Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Please spare us. Given your maths skills' date=' I won't be surprised if you are paying double for everything..from house rent to The Afretard's guide to T20 DVDs.[/quote'] :laugh: Link to comment
Celeste Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 transparent is like bollywood hero..taking apart several villians left right & center... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now