flamy Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 This times paper is same paper were ATHERTON is lead cricket writer. They are leading the anti India cricket crusade. But problem is we keep winning:hysterical: The writer Wilde also write anti india piece a week ago. The jelously is fabulous to see. We have the money and the team. Suck it up! :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
flamy Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Incredible insights peekay :finger: no trolling on PK. :mad: brb trolling on this article's comments page. Link to comment
Ram Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 This has got to be THE most factually inaccurate, analytically impotent and horrendously biased cricketing article to appear in a long time. Link to comment
champ Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 who cares .. we will be numberrrr oneeeeeeeee !!! :bhangra::bhangra: Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 This has got to be THE most factually inaccurate' date=' analytically impotent and horrendously biased cricketing article to appear in a long time.[/quote'] The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper link me please Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article6942221.ece Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 ^ Read the online responses to the articvle by readers at the bottom. He has been raped and humiliated Link to comment
Ram Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 The responses they got totally slammed Wilde and his bias. It was so bad that they did not even publish it in the actual paper and only left it on their online section only. Worst cricket article possibly ever. He has clearly spent to much time *****ing about India with Atherton the lead cricket writer of the paper Who is the author of that article? I am shocked at the total incompetence of what he has come up with. Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Facts = Objective; Opinions = Subjective; I agree with the author. A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1; Based on the rankings, one can argue Sri Lanka are the second best team but the results suggest otherwise. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article6942221.ece :hatsoff: Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Who is the author of that article? I am shocked at the total incompetence of what he has come up with. Simon Wilde. Same paper Atherton writes for Link to comment
Karan114 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Facts = Objective; Opinions = Subjective; I agree with the author. A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1; Based on the rankings, one can argue Sri Lanka are the second best team but the results suggest otherwise. How about you tell us who you think is the no.1 then and give your reasoning? Link to comment
SachDan Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 ^ Simon Wilde. Here's his article when Sachin went past Lara's record last year http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article4969385.ece Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 How about you tell us who you think is the no.1 then and give your reasoning? What difference would my opinion make ? Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 The times(englands leading paper) is so bitter towards India. Look how they start there article reporting sehwags unbeliavable knock ------------------------------- Virender Sehwag proved yesterday, not for the first time, that when the pitch is fine, the bowling friendly and he is in the right mood, there is no more voracious scorer of runs than the India opening batsman. ------------------------------------------------------- They had to give demean the knock a little bit! Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 lendl should have never been #1 since he couldnt win on grass Edit : oops Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 lendl should have never been #1 since he couldnt win in clay I bet we could win on clay! Link to comment
Karan114 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 What difference would my opinion make ? No one's opinion is making a difference...but if you are saying "A ranking of No 1 doesn't mean India is No 1" one would like to know who you think is no.1 and what makes them no.1 Link to comment
Karan114 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 The times(englands leading paper) is so bitter towards India. Look how they start there article reporting sehwags unbeliavable knock ------------------------------- Virender Sehwag proved yesterday, not for the first time, that when the pitch is fine, the bowling friendly and he is in the right mood, there is no more voracious scorer of runs than the India opening batsman. ------------------------------------------------------- They had to give demean the knock a little bit! Hahaha...bitterness emanating from every line there...Murali's bowling "friendly" lol Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now