Guest DeveGowda Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Kallis a half decent bowler? Do people believe that Watson would one day take more wickets than Kallis? About Vettori the point is that he is primarily a defensive bowler. Good for limited overs internationals but not of much use in Test matches. What does one do with bowlers who are not really wicket taking or aggressive? His batting has come on by leaps and bounds but I would not really call him an all rounder. His team needs him very badly though. Best allrounder at the moment - Watson.. Best allrounder of this generation - kallis (but i hope kallis become Best allrounder in IPl :winky:)
achilles Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Kallis a half decent bowler? Do people believe that Watson would one day take more wickets than Kallis? Kallis is lightyears ahead of Watson. He's waaaaaay tooo classy, consistent and fit (:hehe:) than Tw@son. Naysayer can piss off :finger:
Roshanrocks Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 the best al rounder in the owrld is Ramesh Powar..... he is well rounded from all sides :winky:
Serani Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Bravo is only a world class fielder, his batting has much more potential than his bowling, he should average 40 in tests with the bat but he is a typical calypso cricketer.
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Bravo is only a world class fielder' date=' his batting has much more potential than his bowling, he should average 40 in tests with the bat but he is a typical calypso cricketer.[/quote'] I will give you that. He is that rare calypso breed that still exists among Sarwans and Chanderpauls. He is very much like a player from the 80s west indies squad.
Serani Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Early 70's......in the late 70's and 80's Clive Lloyd would beat the **** out of anyone that plays like Bravo and gets out like he does. Bravo would probably have not even got in the Trinidad side back in the day.
vvvslaxman Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Early 70's......in the late 70's and 80's Clive Lloyd would beat the **** out of anyone that plays like Bravo and gets out like he does. Bravo would probably have not even got in the Trinidad side back in the day. Not that attitude. But the shot making style of Bravo is a throw back to the 80s.
Karan114 Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Bravo is only a world class fielder' date=' his batting has much more potential than his bowling, he should average 40 in tests with the bat but he is a typical calypso cricketer.[/quote'] I will agree with that, the talent is definitely there. Not matched by performance - typical lazy West Indian cricketer.
ensd2 Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 in Odi : the best all-rounder is WATSON then Shakib al hasan Yuvraj singh then others ( Vettori's battting average is 16,5 in odi ) in test : DANIEL VETTORI is the best then Jaques Kallis in T20 : Shahid afridi , Yuvraj singh
ensd2 Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 no Flintoff? His international career is nearly over...+ he was injured sikce nearly one year
sandeep Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 Bravo is a poor man's irfan pathan. Vettori by miles.
yoda Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 the best al rounder in the owrld is Ramesh Powar..... he is well rounded from all sides :winky: :hysterical:
nballa Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 i'd have to say afridi in t-20's *inb4pakicomments*
Jersey #10 Posted March 12, 2010 Posted March 12, 2010 i'd have to say afridi in t-20's *inb4pakicomments* Afridi is the best alrounder ever to have played on a cricket ground :listen_dawg: For me Kallis defined the word cricket alrounder for so many years. At this point of time I think Watson is the only one who can come as close to as Kallis.
thevortex Posted March 12, 2010 Author Posted March 12, 2010 the guys in the poll shouldnt even be called All rounders ... thats an insult to true all rounders like Mankad' date='Sobers,Tony Greig,Hadlee,Kapil,Botham,Imran,kallis etc ... compared to these they are like bits and pieces type players .[/quote'] Quite true, Bossbhai. What do do? All rounders are cricket's proudest possessions and they are sparse in number now. What do you think? Who would you choose from the above list? Feel free to add any other contemporary player if you think he deserves the honour better.
Mr Eintstein Posted March 13, 2010 Posted March 13, 2010 Countrywise India : Yuvi, Jadeja Aus : Watson,but against pakistan(White,ponting,johnson,hauritz,clarke,warner,mckay,bollinger,ryan harris,and co......incl. the coach tim nielsen are all world class all rounders). SAF : Kallis, Van Der Merwe Windie : Bravo, Pollard NZ : Vettori, Styris Eng : Wright,Collingwood Pak : All :fail: to qualify Bang : not bothered to includ any :D SL : Jayasuriya But if i have to pick some it ll be Kallis, Vettori, Watson, Bravo and Collingwood. Kallis is the perfect choice, Bravo, Watson and Vettori are very fine all rounders, pollard as a batting all rounder but not quite effective bowler, same goes with Paul collingwood.Still due to his strong batting Colly will bviously come ahead of Pollard. Yuvraj if he improves his bowling under non turning conditions will be a far better choice tha nBravo and Watson missed out TUFFEY!:omg:
gaurav92 Posted March 14, 2010 Posted March 14, 2010 missed out TUFFEY!:omg: :fail: What is this do with allrounder qualification ? :giggle: Here the discussion is for who is currently best allrounder NOT Allround role model.... I take the Spirit with which he plays the game into account as well while judging the quality of an allrounder, or in that case any player be it a batsman a bowler or an allrounder.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now