Jump to content

Bradman is the greatest, Sachin comes only second: Waugh, Benaud


Feed

Bradman is the greatest, Sachin comes only second: Waugh, Benaud  

2 members have voted

  1. 1.



Recommended Posts

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted

Ive got a question If Bradman was born in 1970 and/or SRT born in 1910; how much would each have averaged at the end of their careers (assuming they still became cricketers)...

Posted
Ive got a question If Bradman was born in 1970 and/or SRT born in 1910; how much would each have averaged at the end of their careers (assuming they still became cricketers)...
If only we knew the answer to such questions (like how much Bradman would have averaged in modern times or Goddy in 1910 or 1930) then this whole debate would have been settled one way or the other a long time ago.
Posted

Impossible to answer. If we had a time machine and transfered the players over. Goddy would pi$$ over everyone, but being born in that era is a whole other story - we just can't say

Posted
sad! i expected this thread to cross 2000 by now... not enuff posters interested in this debate any more :((
just wait for the 2nd test - when Goddy scores another century, this thread will come alive again :haha:
Posted
Most unfortunately for you since you have your brain embedded sooo deep into into your ***** you cant see the tons of cricket experts include good ol' Bradders himself that have openly come out and endorsed SRT. That is a side effect of having your brain in the wrong place. PS : I forgot to sprinkle a few smilies .... here you go : :cantstop: :haha: :hysterical: :laugh: And ?
Your response is even more comical than I expected. So I guess, when Bradman said that of today's batsman, Tendulkar is closest to how he would probably bat implies that people thought Tendulkar is the greatest (even greater than Bradman) :hysterical: This is exactly how "Tendulkar is the greatest" band is suppose to play. I mean if you guys didn't think crap how would you imagine Tendulkar to be the greatest :giggle:
Posted
Ive got a question If Bradman was born in 1970 and/or SRT born in 1910; how much would each have averaged at the end of their careers (assuming they still became cricketers)...
If Sachin would have born in 1910 and continued to play till now I am sure he would have had 99,999 Test runs and 499 centuries taking into account everything.
Posted

Since this was an old poll I suggest another poll to check on how Bradman and Tendulkar will do against each other now if voted for. Let us see what the forum thinks at the end of 2010. What say?

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted
Didnt you and your sidekicks say that DGBs Peers > SRT ? Atleast try to remember your own statements ... before you decide to sprinkle some smilies ... :hysterical: :giggle:
I am sure that's what you would have understood :giggle:
Posted
Ive got a question If Bradman was born in 1970 and/or SRT born in 1910; how much would each have averaged at the end of their careers (assuming they still became cricketers)...
Tendulkar : 60-65 Bradman : 75-80
Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...