Chandan Posted July 24, 2010 Posted July 24, 2010 I disagree that Sachin's lack of form was DUE to his injuries. His injuries compounded his lack of form which preceded them. In fact, I think Sachin has a bit to thank his injuries for they forced him to take a break which not only allowed his injuries to heal but brought him back fresh to the game. One can find many other examples of great players running into bad form. Today the problem has got compounded because the top players do not play as much first class cricket as they used to earlier. Coming back a level in quality of opposition and starting to score runs again does lots for the confidence and confidence is what a top player tends to lose when the bad run starts getting extended. I have always maintained that selectors do a great dis-servise to top players in India by not dropping them when off colour. So many have benefitted from being finally dropoped. Ganguly, Sehwag, Dravid, Laxman are just a few examples. And I disagree with you strongly. Sachin had started getting the discomfort due to tennis elbow just after Asia cup in 2004 and it forced him to miss a part of that all important series against the Aussies at home that year. Even then he scored 915 runs in 15 innings in that calender year. But things started deteriorating here for him on injury front and he kept struggling with them till the end of 2006, missing the WI test series earlier in the same year. You could not have expected a player to be in sublime form with an injured elbow, shoulder and bicep. Or did you expect that? And what is the reason for you to believe for the loss of Sachin's form from which he came out so superbly as soon as he gained full fitness?
SJS50 Posted July 25, 2010 Posted July 25, 2010 And I disagree with you strongly. Sachin had started getting the discomfort due to tennis elbow just after Asia cup and it forced him to miss a part of that all important series against the Aussies at home. Even then he scored 915 runs in 15 innings. But things started deteriorating here for him on injury front and he kept struggling with them till the end of 2006, missing the WI test series earlier in the same year. You could not have expected a player to be in sublime form with an injured elbow, shoulder and bicep. Or did you expect that? And what is the reason for you to believe for the loss of Sachin's form which came out so superbly as soon as he gained full fitness? That's perfectly okay Chandan. We can agree to disagree once in a while :-)
Roshanrocks Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 AS of July 11, 2010 [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|166| 271| 13447| 55.56| 47| 54 Ricky Ponting |144| 243| 11928| 55.22| 39| 51 [/table] a gap of 1519 runs a gap of 8 centuries Updated [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|168| 274| 13641| 55.90| 48| 55 Ricky Ponting |146| 247| 12026| 54.66| 39| 51 [/table] a gap of 1519 1615 runs a gap of 8 9 centuries To be continued :smoke:
Lord Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 its been updated after 2 matches matlab? cricinfo has Sachin at 13539.i guess it doesnt include today's knock.so that takes it 13647,isnt it?:hmmm:
Lord Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 ^ thanks for clarifying btw,Boss is very close to touching 56 average:woot:lets hope he does it tomorrow:pray:
kabira Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 1621 means Boss has to retire and Ponting has to have one of his best year to catch up. seems uphill task for Ponting to catch us Boss
Ranjha Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 Ponting wont catch up with Sachin. I think at the end of ther carrers, ponting will fall short by 15 test centuries.
Lord Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 updated [table=head;sort=4]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|168| 274| 13742| 56.08| 48| 55 Ricky Ponting |146| 247| 12026| 54.66| 39| 51 [/table] Run Difference-1716 runs Ton difference-9 tons
Roshanrocks Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 1615-1519=96 Sachin scored 108 today:hmmm: I updated it in the middle of the innings :regular_smile:
THX_1138 Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 i ll venture so far as to say that tendulkar will reach 50 centuries before ponting makes his 40th.
Robin Hood Posted July 31, 2010 Posted July 31, 2010 Time to change the 100's graph in front page and keep it uptodate bhai, especially when god is doing well.
Roshanrocks Posted August 7, 2010 Posted August 7, 2010 [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|169| 276| 13837| 56.02| 48| 56 Ricky Ponting |146| 247| 12026| 54.66| 39| 51 [/table] A gap of 1811 runs A gap of 9 100's :two_thumbs_up: Just imagine.... On 15th March 2010, their stats read [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|162| 265| 12970| 54.72| 43| 54 Ricky Ponting |142| 240|11859|55.67| 39| 51 [/table] A gap of 1111 runs A gap of 4 100's
Lord Posted August 7, 2010 Posted August 7, 2010 [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|169| 276| 13837| 56.02| 48| 56 Ricky Ponting |146| 247| 12026| 54.66| 39| 51 [/table] A gap of 1811 runs A gap of 9 100's :two_thumbs_up: :punter:
SachDan Posted August 7, 2010 Posted August 7, 2010 [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|169| 276| 13837| 56.02| 48| 56 Ricky Ponting |146| 247| 12026| 54.66| 39| 51 [/table] A gap of 1811 runs A gap of 9 100's :two_thumbs_up: Just imagine.... On 15th March 2010, their stats read [table=head;sort=7]Name|Matches| Innings|Runs|Average|100|50 Sachin Tendulkar|162| 265| 12970| 54.72| 43| 54 Ricky Ponting |142| 240|11859|55.67| 39| 51 [/table] A gap of 1111 runs A gap of 4 100's Goddy
SachDan Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Pwnting's serious drop in average in the last four years.. Ended 2006 with an average of 59.38 2007 - 58.73 2008 - 57.20 2009 - 55.26 Present - 54.66 And his next series ? Against India in India where he averages a mere 20.85 in 12 matches !! :punter: :hehe:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now