The Outsider Posted March 17, 2010 Author Posted March 17, 2010 lol ... problem here is that unlike SRT vs DGB ... Rameez has barely a third of runs that Hammond did .... whereas SRT has almost twice as many as DGB .... That's all? Then shouldn't have problems with the following : Boucher > Headley Atherton > Sutcliffe/Hobbs Butcher/Hick > Pollock :giggle:
Lurker Posted March 17, 2010 Posted March 17, 2010 Pfft ... I have the killer one "Sir" GOB Allen > Donald ... because he frakin played when your hero was around ... and an entire 60 yrs before Donald touched a cricket ball ... Alternately you can also write...Mashallah I haz been pwned :giggle::giggle:
Pakistan-India Posted March 17, 2010 Posted March 17, 2010 its amazing how much effort you people put up to prove your point, hammond who? lol
vvvslaxman Posted March 17, 2010 Posted March 17, 2010 Pfft ... I have the killer one "Sir" GOB Allen > Donald ... because he frakin played when your hero was around ... and an entire 60 yrs before Donald touched a cricket ball ... Yea.. but if Tendulkar averages high in matches that Donald took part that logic will apply. Tendulkar averages 32 in the matches Donald took part. Dismissed 6 times by Donald. Steve Waugh averages 68, Atherton averages 45, Ridley Jacobs averages 52, Greame Hick averages 42, Damien Martyn averages 62, Hayden averages 47 list goes on.. in the matches that Donald played.
Pak_Forever Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 and all this time I used to think that Rameez was just an ok player. Thanks for opening my eyes outsider. :--D Rameez bhai zindabad :hatsoff:
vvvslaxman Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 you trolling again vvs ? Come on dude. Cool it off. This thread was created for fun. We might as well have it :winky:
EnterTheVoid Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 12) Rameez carried 3 times the burder than Walter Hammond ever did...in terms of hair. yeh but Rameez had to bat with the knowledge that he would one day become a terrible comentator distracting him from piling on the runs. :hysterical:
DomainK Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Karan114 Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 Rameez also had to play in the match fixing era leading to increased pressure in the knowledge that some of his team mates were cheating and may have asked him to under perform' date=' this mental strain must have affected rameez performance in a major way.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
achilles Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 Brilliant thread :two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up: 12) Rameez carried 3 times the burder than Walter Hammond ever did...in terms of hair. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
saneindian Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 LOL a classic thread! Rameez Bhai must be feeling so proud today B->
teacup Posted March 18, 2010 Posted March 18, 2010 On the same token, Hammond must be greater than Tendulkar, Lara, Gavaskar and Viv Richards.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now