IKnowU Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 http://www.news.com.au/business/billionaires-pankaj-and-radhika-oswal-declare-meat-war-on-building-site/story-e6frfm1i-1225846500573 Indians declare meat ban in Australia for workers on their property. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: These billionaire couple are building Australia richest and largest home valued at 70million dollars.........and the workers cant eat meat while building the house. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Ram Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 An obvious publicity stunt by the couple. They have accused the meat eating people of 'raping the earth'. So lets get this straight - You can spend 70 million dollars and build Australia's biggest mansion without causing any harm to the environment, but a worker in their home eating a simply ham sandwich damages our planet? Anyone miss the obvious hypocrisy here? But hey, the stunt worked and they got into the news, so everyone's happy.
ViruRulez Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 An obvious publicity stunt by the couple. They have accused the meat eating people of 'raping the earth'. So lets get this straight - You can spend 70 million dollars and build Australia's biggest mansion without causing any harm to the environment, but a worker in their home eating a simply ham sandwich damages our planet? Anyone miss the obvious hypocrisy here? But hey, the stunt worked and they got into the news, so everyone's happy. I agree that it is absolute hypocrisy ... they are spending 70 million dollars on building a house instead of helping out the poor or other good work and on the other hand they are accusing meat industry o raping the earth .. they seem to be a "sathiya gaya hai" couple
flamy Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 stupid couple. This calls for a definite lawsuit. they are telugu indians brah
DomainK Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 An obvious publicity stunt by the couple. They have accused the meat eating people of 'raping the earth'. So lets get this straight - You can spend 70 million dollars and build Australia's biggest mansion without causing any harm to the environment, but a worker in their home eating a simply ham sandwich damages our planet? Anyone miss the obvious hypocrisy here? But hey, the stunt worked and they got into the news, so everyone's happy. :dito:
IKnowU Posted March 28, 2010 Author Posted March 28, 2010 Theyve been on the news heaps of other times.....they just want to be known for their mother nature respect and loyalty.......
azanian Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I don't think that muslims or jews would allow their workers to eat pork on site
Clarke Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Mr Oswal, who is in New York this week helping Mrs Oswal prepare for the launch of her vegetarian fast-food chain, Otarian, defended the meat ban, saying "This is our home" There, a free means to announce the launch of a new business.
ViruRulez Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I don't think that muslims or jews would allow their workers to eat pork on site why not .. I would never stop anybody unless it affects their working in my construction .. but I would not allow a heavily drunk worker for sure because he would not be in his full senses to carry out construction work
yoda Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 All rhetoric aside, it is simply boils down to this. They are simple saying it is their home and as long as someone is inside their home, they are saying abide by our rules. Only problem I see is that it is in violation of labor laws and freedom in a work place. So is this a place of work or someone's home? I say it is a place of work till the house construction is done. May be the rule makes sense if they need someone come over to do minor work on the house later.
flamy Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 i'm more disturbed by the guy's jawline. :hysterical::hysterical:
Guest Gunner Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 i'm more disturbed by the guy's jawline. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Mamu Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 All rhetoric aside, it is simply boils down to this. They are simple saying it is their home and as long as someone is inside their home, they are saying abide by our rules. Only problem I see is that it is in violation of labor laws and freedom in a work place. So is this a place of work or someone's home? I say it is a place of work till the house construction is done. May be the rule makes sense if they need someone come over to do minor work on the house later. The Work Place can have their own "Set of Rules" you abide by. The couple can say -- I am allergic to meat and I do not want any meat morsels around when I visit. Having said all of this -- The Couple is absolutely stupid and narrow minded in their thinking.
Online Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 out before the Oswals are found to be guilty of a Ponzi scheme
IKnowU Posted April 2, 2010 Author Posted April 2, 2010 out before the Oswals are found to be guilty of a Ponzi scheme nah they are pretty legit......except they had minor run ins with some of the pollution that was created from the industry.
Recommended Posts