King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 You stated in another thread that if 30s Bradman was put in time machine and played now he would still be best batsman in the world. Applying the same logic(if you can call it logic:--D), do you think if the great LOHMANN was put in a time machine and played now, would he also still be the best bowler in the world?:--D Still waiting for answer to my question laxy?:--D
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lohmann He looks fearsome in the picture! Bradman was lucky he played 30 years later and missed the golden era of bowling
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Still waiting for answer to my question laxy?:--D No i already answered. If you couldn't infer from it here you go again. he will be the best bowler in this era as well. Prove me wrong :hysterical: is it so hard to believe better batsmen, better bowlers can live in the same era?
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 He looks fearsome in the picture! Bradman was lucky he played 30 years later and missed the golden era of bowling His average would have gone a little up if he had played in Bradman's era. That is the power of bradman. :hysterical:
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 So you agree bowlers were good in that era. You automatically agree Bradman played better bowlers in that era. :hysterical: See how it backfired. Nope ! You are displaying a shocking lack of cricket history knowledge. LOHMANN the great played in golden era of 1890s. Bradman played in 1930s. Totally different eras. The ignorance diplayed of legends of the game on this site is shocking!!!:(( p.s have the decency to retract your claim that it backfired now:cantstop:
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 You stated in another thread that if 30s Bradman was put in time machine and played now he would still be best batsman in the world. Applying the same logic(if you can call it logic:--D), do you think if the great LOHMANN was put in a time machine and played now, would he also still be the best bowler in the world?:--D Simple yes or no answer please!
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Nope ! You are displaying a shocking lack of cricket history knowledge. LOHMANN the great played in golden era of 1890s. Bradman played in 1930s. Totally different eras. The ignorance diplayed of legends of the game on this site is shocking!!!:(( p.s have the decency to retract your claim that it backfired now:cantstop: Hello genius.. did you even comperehend what i wrote? According to your fanboys post 1975 is one era. Pre 1975 is another era. Both 1930 and 1890 come in that era. Try to think next time.
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Simple yes or no answer please! YES an emphatic one !! He would still be the best !! :hysterical:
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 No i already answered. If you couldn't infer from it here you go again. he will be the best bowler in this era as well. Prove me wrong :hysterical: is it so hard to believe better batsmen' date= better bowlers can live in the same era? Really!!! So a guy you never heard of till yesterday is no according to you best bowler ever. ALL HAIL LOHMANN:king:
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Really!!! So a guy you never heard of till yesterday is no according to you best bowler ever. ALL HAIL LOHMANN:king: If you are ignorant not everyone is ignorant. I knew about Lohmann before i knew about Tendulkar.
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 your poor attempt at sarcasm :fail: :cantstop:
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 So you have always felt that Lohmann is the greates bowler ever? 11,622 posts on this cricket site and you never felt to mention that Lohmann is greatest bowler ever in your opinion?
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 So laxman believes put Lohmann in a time machine and he would be best in 2010 as well!
King Tendulkar Posted March 30, 2010 Author Posted March 30, 2010 If you are ignorant not everyone is ignorant. I knew about Lohmann before i knew about Tendulkar. Really?
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 So you have always felt that Lohmann is the greates bowler ever? 11,622 posts on this cricket site and you never felt to mention that Lohmann is greatest bowler ever in your opinion? There has never been a discussion so far about best bowler ever. I have not seen anywhere. First time you post here. Obviously EVEN you know about him :hysterical: .
Guest DeveGowda Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 He looks fearsome in the picture! Bradman was lucky he played 30 years later and missed the golden era of bowling Now looks also plays important role in greatness...:hysterical:
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Really? Yes sir. My family follows cricket for generation. Lot of wisden books were available at hour house.
vvvslaxman Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 KT has become like LOST producer. Don't know how to go any further lol. Ask jacob he will help you!
zen Posted March 30, 2010 Posted March 30, 2010 Doesn't the name "SPIN magazine" tell you something about the nature of the article? In that case does the name 'teacup' tells something about the nature of your posts :P
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now