Jump to content

Warne is not a great spinner(as did not dominate peers as per Bradman theory)


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just because two teams play cricket and it is classified as "test cricket" doesnt mean that it automatically becomes competitive and that those who did well are greats. Certainly not to the level and ruthlessness of modern day cricket. Check post#105 in the Bradman thread.
And just because a retard starts a thread that could serve a purpose to further strengthen your one-point-agenda does not mean you have got to make an appearance. Surely you are smart enough to realize the value of these kind of moronic threads and its (adverse) impact on quality of a forum. If not then maybe I give you lot more credit than you deserve. xxx
Posted
Check post#105 in the Bradman thread.
:hysterical::hysterical: You just keep going on and on about post #105 like a phata, besura raag ignoring the fact that all points were dismantled and maimed beyond recognition during the course of the thread and the result of the carnage summarized in post #1058 to which you had no answer. But I fully expect that post #105 to continue making it's appearance in your posts.
Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted

What is going on in ICF these days.Whats with these non stop whining insulting mocking threads are about.To prove Sachin > Bradman? Pathetic indeed.

Posted
What is going on in ICF these days.Whats with these non stop whining insulting mocking threads are about.To prove Sachin > Bradman? Pathetic indeed.
:hysterical: KT ke upar ladkiya bhi fida hai
Posted

People dont like it cos I follow their crappy logic through and apply them to other players and make them look like fools. The reliance on stats by others is used to show them up and they have no reply apart from abuse

Guest DeveGowda
Posted

Layman lover struck again:hysterical:

Posted

KT is dominating his peers with 2x more peer domination threads than his successor (BB). I nominate him the greatest peer domination thread starter ever.

Posted
KT is dominating his peers with 2x more peer domination threads than his successor (BB). I nominate him the greatest peer domination thread starter ever.
:cantstop:
Posted

KT: Let's leave aside Bradman for now. And, if you think it's SRT vs Bradman, then you are sadly mistaken. For every SRT, there are 10+ SRTs in the last 30 years that are comparable to him (statistically or otherwise). So, if you somehow prove that Bradman isnt the greatest, that doesnt mean the tag automatically falls on to Tendulkar. Btw, I think Warne and SRT are in the same boat. They have been surrounded by enormous hype, but their statistics dont prove, by any means, that they are the greatest in their fields. Warne has the advantage that the number of good spin bowlers in the history of the game is fairly small.

Posted
KT: Let's leave aside Bradman for now. And, if you think it's SRT vs Bradman, then you are sadly mistaken. For every SRT, there are 10+ SRTs in the last 30 years that are comparable to him (statistically or otherwise). So, if you somehow prove that Bradman isnt the greatest, that doesnt mean the tag automatically falls on to Tendulkar. Btw, I think Warne and SRT are in the same boat. They have been surrounded by enormous hype, but their statistics dont prove, by any means, that they are the greatest in their fields. Warne has the advantage that the number of good spin bowlers in the history of the game is fairly small.
I would suggest you start follow actual cricket instead of following it on cricinfo's statsguru. Then you will understand what the 'hype' around Warne and Sachin is all about particularly since the 'hype' is created by most of the greatest experts, cricket critics and current and ex players and not some no name on a forum digging through statsguru
Posted
I would suggest you start follow actual cricket instead of following it on cricinfo's statsguru. Then you will understand what the 'hype' around Warne and Sachin is all about particularly since the 'hype' is created by most of the greatest experts' date=' cricket critics and current and ex players and not some no name on a forum digging through statsguru[/quote'] What makes you think I dont follow cricket? And what makes you think the cricket experts are better at identifying the "greatest" cricketer? None of them could and would have predicted that Laxman, Sehwag, Hayden, Waugh, Kumble, etc would turn out to be great cricketers.
Posted
What makes you think I dont follow cricket? And what makes you think the cricket experts are better at identifying the "greatest" cricketer? None of them could and would have predicted that Laxman' date=' Sehwag, Hayden, Waugh, Kumble, etc would turn out to be great cricketers.[/quote'] Its not about predicting. Its about seeing what they've achieved. People in the profession know what it takes to achieve what they have
Posted
Its not about predicting. Its about seeing what they've achieved. People in the profession know what it takes to achieve what they have
So you guys cant see that there are a bunch of others who have achieved what Tendulkar has achieved in test cricket in the last 15 years (apart from the longevity)? Or does it take experts to point out that so and so achieved more? Btw you guys should read Donald's summary of the top 5 batsmen of his time. It's bullshit.
Posted
So you guys cant see that there are a bunch of others who have achieved what Tendulkar has achieved in test cricket in the last 15 years (apart from the longevity)? Or does it take experts to point out that so and so achieved more? Btw you guys should read Donald's summary of the top 5 batsmen of his time. It's bullshit.
Don't know how you concluded that, I was just pointing out MTC is not talking about experts making predictions, they've given their opinions based on what they've seen. I'm not gonna spell out what he's achieved, because if you haven't already noticed that by watching, I'm not gonna convince you of anything

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...