Gunner_Mania Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 @Preca - Why won't run rates count. In your scenario SA, Pakistan & NZ would all be on 2 pts. so how does Pak go through?
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Pak has a superior RR as compared to the other two. If we win, that means both NZ and SA lose so obviously their RR would decrease much further. In the scenario that all three teams are on 2 pts after the last matche
Precambrian Posted May 9, 2010 Author Posted May 9, 2010 @Preca - Why won't run rates count. In your scenario SA' date=' Pakistan & NZ would all be on 2 pts. so how does Pak go through?[/quote'] Pak, NZ and South Africe all will have 2 points each. Since Pakistan has better run rate they'll go through. These rules must be amended. Cricket is the only sport on this planet which still has loopholes which allow teams which have lost more matches than they won to get to semifinals. Shame on ICC. Booo.
someone Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 What a load of **** you are acting like our parosis. Bitter and excuses. It would be you again who would have made that first group stages points should not be accumulated in the second group stage had India lost 1 match in the first group stage and there was this accumulation system.
Lord Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Why the heck r we caring for Pakis?we r in different group:dontknow: n we r ourselves to blame for our problems.we lost to Aussies n lost embarassingly,if we had come close,we had better chances
hari504504 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Pak has a superior RR as compared to the other two. If we win' date=' that means both NZ and SA lose so obviously their RR would decrease much further. In the scenario that all three teams are on 2 pts after the last matche[/quote'] yup..credit to Pakistan for making such a close fight of it against NZ....and we sucked against the Aussies... nothing to whine about this situation, it isn't like the weather played a huge part or anything(yet..)
Bradman99 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Pak, NZ and South Africe all will have 2 points each. Since Pakistan has better run rate they'll go through. These rules must be amended. Cricket is the only sport on this planet which still has loopholes which allow teams which have lost more matches than they won to get to semifinals. Shame on ICC. Booo. Is that right ? How about football.. In the champions league ?
Pak_Forever Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Stop embarassing yourself dude. Pakistan is the most fluke team. They won both 1992 WC and ICC T20 2009 by luck. Nobody is whining. You simply don't deserve to be in semi-finals. Well all these luck theories make hardly any sense since rules are exactly the same for all teams in all groups of the tournament. No need to cry and complain. If you really believe that Pakistan makes it only through luck all the time, then too bad luck likes Pakistan and not your team. :--D
coffee_rules Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Pak is going thru. India will lose again because our stupid fecking captain takes 2 pace bowlers and decides to chase yet again...
Pak_Forever Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Pak is going thru. India will lose again because our stupid fecking captain takes 2 pace bowlers and decides to chase yet again... Why are you guys so worried? India chances for semis look 10 times more than Pakistan. India is more likely to beat WI and SL than Pakistan beating SA.
Precambrian Posted May 9, 2010 Author Posted May 9, 2010 Is that right ? How about football.. In the champions league ? Yeah what about it? Shame on all you who thinks am having a whine. I don't care a feck whether India or Pakistan or Australia gets benefit of this. I am just pointing out a flaw with the ICC's scheduling.
cricket786 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Still not fair, eh Precambrian? India and Pak more or less in the same situation now in their respective groups.
satyam1729 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Still not fair' date=' eh Precambrian? India and Pak more or less in the same situation now in their respective groups.[/quote'] India don't deserve to be in Semis . Simple
CSK Fan Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 India don't deserve to be in Semis . Simple then India didnt deserve the ODI 83, Wc, Pak ddint deserve the ODI 92 WC and Aus didnt deserve the ODI 96 Wc. It doesnt work like that
f2000560 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 Still not fair' date=' eh Precambrian? India and Pak more or less in the same situation now in their respective groups.[/quote'] atleast pak came close in the two matches we were walloped !
cricket786 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 India don't deserve to be in Semis . Simple Neither does Pakistan, but both have their chances now. I feel India could do it though.
satyam1729 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 then India didnt deserve the ODI 83' date=' Wc, Pak ddint deserve the ODI 92 WC and Aus didnt deserve the ODI 96 Wc. It doesnt work like that[/quote'] India defeated WI twice. We deseved to be champion in 83
Karan114 Posted May 9, 2010 Posted May 9, 2010 atleast pak came close in the two matches we were walloped ! Hate to admit it - but true (though the England defeat wasn't that close despite the eventual scoreline, but still better than our efforts :(()
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now