Bublu Bhuyan Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 I was really wondering, is there any batsman from the past (apart from Bradman) who tops Tendulkar in this department? I have looked at the 100/innings ratio of lots of great players from Sobers to Richards, Gavaskar, Chappell, Border, Ponting, Lara, Dravid, Hayden, Kallis, etc but all of them falls short. Please note that I'm including Hayden because he did score quite a lot of centuries in his career, not because I consider him in the same league as Sobers or Richards. However, I haven't looked for players beyond Sobers's time like Barrington, Hobbs, Hutton, George Headley, etc. There have been plenty of great players and it's just not easy to look at each one of their's performance in this regard. This is an area where StatsGuru doesn't help either. To your knowledge, is there anyone apart from Bradman who tops Tendulkar's ratio of a century per 5.70 innings? P.S. A point by the way, I don't think it would be fair to include Graeme Pollock and Barry Richards in the competition (although you still might). Both were tremendous batsman. Bradman included Barry Richards in his dream team, and he considered Graeme Pollock to be the finest left hander along with Sobers that he ever saw. But Pollock played barely 20 odd Test matches, while Richards ended up playing about 4 odd Test matches. Their careers were cut short by apartheid.
Bublu Bhuyan Posted July 29, 2010 Author Posted July 29, 2010 list with cutoff : >10 career hundreds. The last col = Inns/100 DG Bradman 52 80 10 6996 99.94 58.61 29 2.755 CL Walcott 44 74 7 3798 56.69 0.00 15 4.926 H Sutcliffe 54 84 9 4555 60.73 34.60 16 5.263 ED Weekes 48 81 5 4455 58.62 0.00 15 5.405 SR Tendulkar 166 271 29 13647 55.93 54.35 48 5.708 GS Sobers 93 160 21 8032 57.78 53.92 26 6.135 ML Hayden 103 184 14 8625 50.74 60.11 30 6.135 SM Gavaskar 125 214 16 10122 51.12 44.42 34 6.289 GS Chappell 87 151 19 7110 53.86 51.53 24 6.289 RT Ponting 145 245 27 11954 54.83 59.53 39 6.289 Mohammad Yousuf 29 152 12 7431 53.08 52.39 24 6.329 WR Hammond 85 140 16 7249 58.46 38.07 22 6.369 KC Sangakkara 88 149 10 7549 55.10 55.53 23 6.478 KF Barrington 82 131 15 6806 58.67 42.44 20 6.536 RN Harvey 79 137 10 6149 48.42 43.51 21 6.536 DPMD Jayawardene 110 184 14 9120 54.29 52.63 28 6.571 AR Morris 46 79 3 3533 46.49 45.42 12 6.579 V Sehwag 76 133 5 6691 53.53 80.88 20 6.650 M Azharuddin 99 147 9 6215 45.04 57.85 22 6.667 JH Kallis 140 237 35 11126 55.08 44.52 35 6.757 BC Lara 131 232 6 11953 52.89 60.51 34 6.803 JB Hobbs 61 102 7 5410 56.95 46.54 15 6.803 KP Pietersen 62 111 6 5166 49.20 62.85 16 6.944 Younis Khan 63 112 7 5260 50.10 53.73 16 6.993 MJ Clarke 61 99 12 4434 50.97 53.62 14 7.092 Thanks a lot for the list, bro. You're awesome.
Spider Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Tendulkar matches Bradman if you just use minnows. Against Bangers and Zim Tendulkar scores a hundred every 2.8 innings. Take out the minnows though and Things change.
Robin Hood Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 If you look at the list, Sangakkara is at exact halfway mark of tendulkar in tests and has exactly almost half the runs. Considering sangakkaras age is 33, wondering whether he will overtake ponting when he retires. Also jayawardane.
Tapioca Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 What is the column between average and centuries (58.61 for Bradman etc) ?
kabira Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Tendulkar matches Bradman if you just use minnows. Against Bangers and Zim Tendulkar scores a hundred every 2.8 innings. Take out the minnows though and Things change. so you are trying to say Bradman scorred against Minnows. :winky::winky::winky:
bhanu Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Bradman 2.755 wow just wow man :hatsoff::hatsoff::hatsoff:
Bublu Bhuyan Posted July 29, 2010 Author Posted July 29, 2010 Bradman 2.755 wow just wow man :hatsoff::hatsoff::hatsoff: His average is the greatest statistical achievement in any damn sport in the world. Till this day I haven't understood how he managed to average more than 99. It would be like a bowler averaging a wicket for every run he concedes.
bhanu Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 His average is the greatest statistical achievement in any damn sport in the world. Till this day I haven't understood how he managed to average more than 99. It would be like a bowler averaging a wicket for every run he concedes. Yea dats y he is such a amazing cricketar and yea its dat truth dat if he had hit a four in his last game then he woulda reached 7000 runs and 100 average? :hatsoff:
imran666 Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 theres only one player who tops sachin in that department ..IMRAN LARA FAHRAT :winky:
Chalks Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Stats Buzz: Sachin Tendulkar now joins Steve Waugh as the only player to score 150 against every test playing nation. Suck it, haters. :finger:
nballa Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 like the wiseman once said - the only ratio i care about in the whole world of cricket is the W/L ratio. nothing else matters, not petty averages or strikerates. and i am that wiseman.
The Outsider Posted July 29, 2010 Posted July 29, 2010 Kaneria easily beats Tendulkar and is running Bradman real close. A few good innings and he'll be there : http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/40043.html?class=1;concededmin1=100;concededval1=conceded;filter=advanced;orderby=default;template=results;type=bowling 111/39 = 2.84
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now