King Tendulkar Posted August 17, 2010 Author Posted August 17, 2010 i dont understand what you guys are trying to prove here... play without any sense of sportsman's spirit... then even after your fecking bowler/board apologizes you guys try to point a finger towards us... :finger.... you are all sore losers Sanga should also apologise as he deliberatley gave 4 byes to deny the ton as well. He also was captain and over saw and orchestrated the whole shocking affair. Sanga must also apologise
Lord Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 I am afraid there can be no defending such acts. Whether it was Sehwag who did it or anybody from any other team. i'm not defending Sehwag,but just trying to see the reason,trying to win the game is pretty valid,thats what everybody plays for btw,Sehwag WAS fined for that.Randiv hasnt been yet.
Don Sharma Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 I don't think we can be certain that the byes were deliberate. Can't be proved! The no ball was another matter. He was almost a feet over lol.
King Tendulkar Posted August 17, 2010 Author Posted August 17, 2010 I don't think we can be certain that the byes were deliberate. Can't be proved! The no ball was another matter. He was almost a feet over lol. Yeah agree cant be proved in a court of law! But we all know he did it on purpose, such a simple take and yet missed it, no accident. As shown by the subsequent no ball done under team orders.
Andy Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 But Dont forget this incident too..:eyedance: Ganguly bowled a widish delivery to get rid of sanath (given that he had few more overs to reach 200) in his famous 189 and I'm pretty sure with that kind of attitude he would have bowled a no ball or any other delivery to prevent sanath from reaching 200 had he been confronted to bowl the last delivery of the innings. :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop: Are you a Nutcase? That wide bowl was bowled deliberately to get Jaya out. Now do you mean Raandiv bowled this no ball to Get Viru out? Stop trolling.
Rajan Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 But Dont forget this incident too..:eyedance: Ganguly bowled a widish delivery to get rid of sanath (given that he had few more overs to reach 200) in his famous 189 and I'm pretty sure with that kind of attitude he would have bowled a no ball or any other delivery to prevent sanath from reaching 200 had he been confronted to bowl the last delivery of the innings. :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop: even by ur cheap standards, this post of yours take the ****ing cake. suck on till u grow up.pathetic and miserable lowlives like u deserve nothing but pity.dont suffer from such deep inferiority complex, may be 1 day u will be able to understand that u have posted utter trash as a defence.god bless u.u need it very badly ,son!
Andy Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 even by ur cheap standards' date=' this post of yours take the ****ing cake. suck on till u grow up.pathetic and miserable lowlives like u deserve nothing but pity.dont suffer from such deep inferiority complex, may be 1 day u will be able to understand that u have posted utter trash as a defence.god bless u.u need it very badly ,son![/quote'] :two_thumbs_up:
Zap_Brannigan Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 But Dont forget this incident too..:eyedance: Ganguly bowled a widish delivery to get rid of sanath (given that he had few more overs to reach 200) in his famous 189 and I'm pretty sure with that kind of attitude he would have bowled a no ball or any other delivery to prevent sanath from reaching 200 had he been confronted to bowl the last delivery of the innings. :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop: Tell me you are joking. If you really think that getting a batsman stumped is wrong, you should just stop watching cricket.
TheWall Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 But Dont forget this incident too..:eyedance: Ganguly bowled a widish delivery to get rid of sanath (given that he had few more overs to reach 200) in his famous 189 and I'm pretty sure with that kind of attitude he would have bowled a no ball or any other delivery to prevent sanath from reaching 200 had he been confronted to bowl the last delivery of the innings. :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop: get some better excuse...:finger:
hatja_tau Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 Now this thread is getting a little heavy, so presenting the Pakistani version of Sehwag's six: http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=140889385943737 :cantstop:
vamos_rafa Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 But Dont forget this incident too..:eyedance: Ganguly bowled a widish delivery to get rid of sanath (given that he had few more overs to reach 200) in his famous 189 and I'm pretty sure with that kind of attitude he would have bowled a no ball or any other delivery to prevent sanath from reaching 200 had he been confronted to bowl the last delivery of the innings. :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: What knowledge of cricket you possess as*****..... now i think he would say that in 1999,taunton ganguly was deliberately hitting 6's to murali so that he could stop him from getting 5 wickets... how unsporty of ganguly... :finger:
thevortex Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 i'm not defending Sehwag,but just trying to see the reason,trying to win the game is pretty valid,thats what everybody plays for btw,Sehwag WAS fined for that.Randiv hasnt been yet. I dont see how an act contravening the spirit of the game changes colour whether it was done in a winning cause or a losing cause. It is all the same.
asterix Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 I dont see how an act contravening the spirit of the game changes colour whether it was done in a winning cause or a losing cause. It is all the same. Looks like you were happy about Viru missing that 100. Does your heart bleeds for Randiv who has incidently apologised to Sehwag now? :giggle:
Lord Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 I dont see how an act contravening the spirit of the game changes colour whether it was done in a winning cause or a losing cause. It is all the same. well I'm not saying what Sehwag did was right,but it was understandable,ofcourse it was wrong n he got punished for it what Randiv did was plain silly n sore loser mentality as Atul Wassan said.I dunno how u can equate the two
achilles Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 Must be..:giggle:..But this is not that kinda pathetic act when considering what Shabby Indians have done in the past..:finger::finger: Two wrongs don't make a right. Don't try to pretend or take the moral highground.
asterix Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 well I'm not saying what Sehwag did was right,but it was understandable,ofcourse it was wrong n he got punished for it what Randiv did was plain silly n sore loser mentality as Atul Wassan said.I dunno how u can equate the two What PROOF do you have? Is there any EVIDENCE? Has any competent authority CERTIFIED it? :hitler:
Sachinism Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 What PROOF do you have? Is there any EVIDENCE? Has any competent authority CERTIFIED it? :hitler: What proof do you want? :hmmmm:
Andy Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 What PROOF do you have? Is there any EVIDENCE? Has any competent authority CERTIFIED it? :hitler: Asterix :adore:
achilles Posted August 17, 2010 Posted August 17, 2010 What proof do you want? :hmmmm: Blah. Asterix is just taking a dig at TheVortex.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now