vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 You should read the quote below by vaibhev He wants to show that avg don't mean much by comparing two guys who have similar averages .... This guy is inline to be one of the biggest comedians at ICF :hysterical: If average is the be all end all in cricket, why is Lara considered a better bat than Jayawardene, samarawera? Infact these guys names' are never said in the same breath as Lara's despite averaging more than lara.----
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 OK so now no-one is trying to prove that Sachin is the greatest :giggle: Like you quoted Lara, when he even refused to compare Bradman w/ Sachin :P Sachin=god has given some links to cricket experts saying sachin > bradman. We have a threadabt zaheer abbas saying sach> breadman on icf recentlt lara says bradman couldnt have averaged what he avged in today's game. And you are still harping over his average?
zen Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Sachin=god has given some links to cricket experts saying sachin > bradman. We have a threadabt zaheer abbas saying sach> breadman on icf recentlt lara says bradman couldnt have averaged what he avged in today's game. And you are still harping over his average? Another dumb post by the dumbass from delhi .... oh boy but your comedy is getting boring now. So up your level, kid :hysterical: What I am suppose to do by reading those links? Eventually find out that many of them didn't even compare Tendulkar with Bradman or am I suppose to assume that those 4-5 links equal that of 100s of cricketers over so many years .... Or do you want me to go around posting links of people like Waugh who said something like noone can be compared with Bradman But even I said that Bradman may not avg 100 today! Despite that I still believe that he is in the league of his own What's hilarious is not that you come up with such remarks but the fact that you post such stupid comments as if they are intelligent or prove something. I don't think I need to mention that as usual your points are pointless And no comment on Afridi > Dhoni :hysterical:
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Another dumb post by the dumbass from delhi .... oh boy but your comedy is getting boring now. So up your level, kid :hysterical: What I am suppose to do by reading those links? Eventually find out that many of them didn't even compare Tendulkar with Bradman or am I suppose to assume that those 4-5 links equal that of 100s of cricketers over so many years .... Or do you want me to go around posting links of people like Waugh who said something like noone can be compared with Bradman But even I said that Bradman may not avg 100 today! Despite that I still believe that he is in the league of his own What's hilarious is not that you come up with such remarks but the fact that you post such stupid comments as if they are intelligent or prove something. I don't think I need to mention that as usual your points are pointless And no comment on Afridi > Dhoni :hysterical: ohh you put an emoticon in your post, mean you must own me now. what a dumb focking Kunt! Waugh = aussie = Same as Bradman = Dont count Bradman mastered dibbly dobbly crap bowlers of primarily 1 country(engalnd) all his career(only played 17 innings in all against other countries). Even if you go by law of averages, he could have been a good to a very good batsman in today's age. Negligible chance of being a Great as Sach or Lara in today's age of professional cricket.
The Outsider Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Ah ha, now the dumbass thinks that using abusives will make his pointless points more meaningful :hysterical: And you expect people to reply to that garbage :giggle: You're so soft, rett! Can't handle a bit of abuse, huh? Just look at the sledging and abuse Tendulkar has handled in the modern era to average 56. Bradman averaged 100 only because there was no sledging and abuse. The one time he was sledged and called a ba$stard, his average dropped to 57. Expect no such favors that were accorded to Bradman on to you.
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Nah' date=' I didn't reply to your garbage, I played around w/ you .... But you wouldn't know the difference :hysterical:[/quote'] whatever keeps you happy...retarded people also have a right to be happy:icflove:
zen Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 You're so soft, rett! Can't handle a bit of abuse, huh? Just look at the sledging and abuse Tendulkar has handled in the modern era to average 56. Bradman averaged 100 only because there was no sledging and abuse. The one time he was sledged and called a ba, his average dropped to 57. Expect no such favors that were accorded to Bradman on to you. I am begining to get the point made by the master comedian on abuses. My average is dropping too :giggle:
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 ^^ why did you delete your inference that aust colonized india? That was freaking hilarious..
zen Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 ^^ why did you delete your inference that aust colonized india? That was freaking hilarious.. why would I delete anything said to dumbasses :giggle: .... someone else probably deleted it Also interested in finding out if Sachin=GOD has any other ID here :--D
Sachin=GOD Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 why would I delete anything said to dumbasses :giggle: .... someone else probably deleted it Also interested in finding out if Sachin=GOD has any other ID here :--D no I don't and you can ask the mods to check it if you don't believe me :hatsoff:
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 why would I delete anything said to dumbasses :giggle: .... someone else probably deleted it Also interested in finding out if Sachin=GOD has any other ID here :--D what a dumbass! by now he would of deleted any proof of that, even if he had another Id. Btw he says hez ayush,21 from lucknow in intro thread, if that helps. one things for sure. hes certianly not that 'srtfanaticssuck' guy
zen Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 what a dumbass! by now he would of deleted any proof of that, even if he had another Id. Btw he says hez ayush,21 from lucknow in intro thread, if that helps. Ah ha, appears as if someone knows a lot of deleting previous IDs :P
pensionplan Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 what a dumbass! by now he would of deleted any proof of that, even if he had another Id. Btw he says hez ayush,21 from lucknow in intro thread, if that helps. one things for sure. hes certianly not that 'srtfanaticssuck' guyHow do you know that?
Anakin Posted December 3, 2010 Posted December 3, 2010 Guys, please focus your attention on BCL, trash him for saying such a silly thing, after all cricket was lighteons ahead of current cricket in pre-WWII and around that time.
vaibhav_delhi Posted December 4, 2010 Posted December 4, 2010 How do you know that? he wouldnt make a Id named 'Isuck", would he?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now