vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 Traditionally our bowlers have one of the poorest strike rate in Tests. Strike rate of Indian bowlers overall (min 50 wickets) Strike rate of Indian bowlers in India (min 25 wickets)
vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Posted April 5, 2011 Surprising entry there is Ishant who seems to do better in India.
Prakat Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 Hirwani has 39 because we didn't give anyone a chance to play him again. :phehehe:
vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Posted April 5, 2011 Hirwani has 39 because we didn't give anyone a chance to play him again. :phehehe: It was basically one test that gave him the boost. 16 wickets in a single test. Otherwise he was mediocre.
akshayxyz Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 what is strike rate No. of balls taken for each wicket. More meaningful in test cricket.
vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Posted April 5, 2011 Looking at the strike rates our current lot seems better than most of the oldies :cantstop: .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now