Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
This should be the perfect example to people who keep clamoring for leaving grass on Indian wickets - all it does is transform tracks into absolute pattas after a few overs.
i think its better than uneven bounce dusty wickets we see at kotla,should make for good limited overs cricket.
Posted
i think its better than uneven bounce dusty wickets we see at kotla' date='should make for good limited overs cricket.[/quote'] Perhaps if watching bowlers getting massacred at 10+ RPO tickles your fancies.
Posted

no pitch can be ever be made to deliberately concede 430 runs in 40 overs. There must have been a loooooooooooooooooot of crappy bowling.. Just look at Agarkar's first 2 overs.. The dude's played 200 ODIs, 50 tests and is a 10+ veteran.. His line and length were appalling.. i honestly cannot imagine how such an experienced bowler can bowl such complete nonsense. Morkel bowled really well. But for the incorrectly called no-ball and the subsequent six of the free hit next ball, he could have easily ended up with figures of 4-0-20-2.

Posted

I thought this was a good 20/20 wicket. Probably a par score of 180 but the bowling today was horrible generally. Some good bowling by Morkel but thats it. Also no one knows how a decent spinner would have fared on that surface, unfair to judge based on Chawla alone. But I prefer the dusty wickets for tests.

×
×
  • Create New...