Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 :hysterical:anwar v sehwag in test??????? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Anwar is comparable to Siddhu. Anwar has a tailender like record against WI and SA. He is just a Pakistani great like Hanif Mohammed was.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 :hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Anwar is comparable to Siddhu. Anwar has a tailender like record against WI and SA. He is just a Pakistani great like Hanif Mohammed was. the same can be said for sehwag.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 the same can be said for sehwag. Yes Anwar has a strike rate of 80 in tests. :hysterical::hysterical: If you think Anwar is comparable to Sehwag , then i say Srinath is comparable to Akram.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Yes Anwar has a strike rate of 80 in tests. :hysterical::hysterical: If you think Anwar is comparable to Sehwag , then i say Srinath is comparable to Akram. i think it's a good comparison.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 i think it's a good comparison. No. It is not. Anwar had no longevity at all. There is huge chance had Anwar played more, his average would have declined like Sehwag and Hayden. He might have ended with average of 45 had he scored 8000+ runs.
deathmonger Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 No. It is not. Anwar had no longevity at all. There is huge chance had Anwar played more' date=' his average would have declined like Sehwag and Hayden. He might have ended with average of 45 had he scored 8000+ runs.[/quote'] LOL he has an average of 45 now. It would have decreased to 40. He's Ganguly level.
goggi Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 This shouldn't even be a comparison. Anwar was just another has been ordinary opener. His only highlight of career was achieved by cheating.
JaFanatic Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 when the thread is about comparing it should be between 2 players of same calibre if we wanna compare sehwag to someone then there is already a thread comparing lara to him
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 No. It is not. Anwar had no longevity at all. There is huge chance had Anwar played more' date=' his average would have declined like Sehwag and Hayden. He might have ended with average of 45 had he scored 8000+ runs.[/quote'] at the rate sehwag is going he might join him
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 at the rate sehwag is going he might join him So unless Sehwag's average reaches below Anwar, Sehwag will be 50% better than Anwar. So compare them when Sehwag's average reaches at that point.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 anwar has failed in 2 countries zim and sa, but sehwag has failed in 4 bang,sa,zim,england
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 anwar has failed in 2 countries zim and sa' date=' but sehwag has failed in 4 bang,sa,zim,england[/quote'] Munaf Patel has test series victory in WI. So he is better than Imran Khan.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Munaf Patel has test series victory in WI. So he is better than Imran Khan. keep it to these 2 players.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 keep it to these 2 players. There is no comparison between 2 players. Next you will compare Umar Akmal to Tendulkar.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 There is no comparison between 2 players. Next you will compare Umar Akmal to Tendulkar. how is there no comparison?
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 how is there no comparison? Sehwag has twice the runs Anwar has at a 15% better average and 55% better Strike rate. As i said compare Anwar to Siddhu. Compare Srinath to Akram.
panther Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Sehwag has twice the runs Anwar has at a 15% better average and 55% better Strike rate. As i said compare Anwar to Siddhu. Compare Srinath to Akram. he has played more than enough test matches to be compared to sehwag if it was only 20-30 than ok your right but he has played 55 test matches.
Sehwag1830 Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 he has played more than enough test matches to be compared to sehwag if it was only 20-30 than ok your right but he has played 55 test matches. Anwar has only 50% runs of Sehwag at inferior average and extremely inferior SR. There is no comparison. No more discussion from my side on this topic. Compare Anwar to Siddhu.
maniac Posted June 28, 2012 Posted June 28, 2012 Sehwag is a tend-setter in world cricket....Anwar is a Pakistani great.....2 different benchmarks
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now