jonas10 Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 oh really? Muslims ruled India for 7-800 years. you're denying that? LOL no im certainly not denying that. What i am denying is a PAKISTANI MUSLIM claiming "we" ruled India for a 1000 years. :hysterical: Let me make something crystal clear to these Pakistanis with no concept of the outside world YOU ARE NOT ARAB! Sorry I know it breaks your hearts but you were converted at the end of a sword. I have no idea why these Pakistani Punjabis magically think they are Arab when all their ancestors came from India. LOL you guys are genetically more like a Sikh from Amritsar or a Hindu from Jaipur than any Damascus/Amman warrior crusader that you think you are! Here's a quick history lesson that ANY website will tell you just do a google search all Pakistanis were once upon a time Hindus or Buddhists. The Arab colonials converted you by force and people like Zaid Hamid are descendents of these people - yup their great great grandparents who "were ruled for a thousand years" they were these same hindus buddhists he now despises. Pakistani Muslim ruler of India - The mughals were all foreign oppressors Tajik Uzbek Persian etc - especially of the ancestors of the now converted Pakistanis who think they are some sort of Arabian blood. :hysterical:They were often the poorest or weakest class that couldnt defend themselves as a result were the easiest to forcibly convert....y ou know people like Zaid Hamid ancestors. Pakistanis - dont speak Arabic, arnt Arab, no holy sites in Pakistan yet they still think they are Arab :hysterical: Too funny. Dont even get me started on this guy claiming "Warning to America we are not Iraq or Afghanistan we are Pakistan you saw what we did to USSR!!" :cantstop: ummmm yah you guys had 100,000 troops surrender to veg eating hippies in 1971.
asterix Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm not sure.. Mughal = Muslims? Could somebody enlighten me please?
EnterTheVoid Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm not sure.. Mughal = Muslims? Could somebody enlighten me please? Its a case of Pakis, who got nothing to do with Mughal emperors, drawing the connection based solely on religion. Mughals ruled India. Pakis didn't rule jack ****.
jonas10 Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm not sure.. Mughal = Muslims? Could somebody enlighten me please? Bro basically - all mughals were muslim all muslims were not mughals. Yah and zero pakistanis i guess you could say people from "undivided india" were mughals. Just the foreign oppressors that forcibly converted the weak and impoverished ln this case the people that form the bulk majority of Pakistan and Bangladesh. Dont know why people like Zaid Hamid are proud of this?
Stuge Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 lol over this muslim ruling india for 1000 years . Its like saying Britishers =Christian[= US&A or other christian countries too] ruled India or paki for whatever years . Man this is really stupid as it gets.Pakistanis will keep hating India and I really hope future Indian generations taught them a lesson, if they do something on the lines of 26/11 . yes ,this is coming from a person, who is a firm follower of Non Violence because Hate and Violence follows such a vicious circle that is hard to end ,but sometimes I feel..Latto ki bhoot baatoon see nahin mantee .So ,We really need to taught these people a lesson .
jonas10 Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Im actually more of a hawk but I personally dont think that a war with Pakistan is the right answer. India could easily spend $100 billion a year on military (Pakistan 5B of their own money at the most) but they are keen on developing their country. I think what needs to be done to teach people like Zaid Hamid a lesson are a few points without firing a single bullet.: 1. Bleed them economically - any of their very few industries in Pakistan Mangos, rice, textiles etc India has a massive advantage over and thats not even India's top industries. Government to utilize some of its huge foreign reserves and subsidize these industries and undercut anything that Pak is exporting. 2. Diplomacy dollars to Afghans and other unfriendly Pak nations like Iran. Cut them off trade wise strengthen relations with them. 3. Huge support to Baloch insurgency movement. Even go so far as to make it open. When some bravado Pak politician notes we want independence for Kashmir and support freedom fighters in Kashmir and equal rebuttal from Indian government officials that we want support for Balochistan and support their freedom fighters. 4. Punish nations that deal with Pakistan. You have a choice you can be in India or Pakistan not both. Large companies like ABB, BHP will not be involved in any procurement or bidding processes in the up coming trillion dollar infrastructure expenditures that will take place over the next five years. India friendly nations can make a fortune others will be shut out. BTW - Wonderful job by India kicking out the US and their F16 F18s from the recent largest arms procurement process. Hopefully they learned 2 lessons in 2 weeks. 5. Complete cut off of all cultural/entertainment ties. No Atif Aslam in bollywood movies, no cricketing ties (except mandatory matches in international tournaments) none of this until the people in Pak entertainment circles pressure the government to end their support for terrorism in India. I would love to one day visit a peaceful safe Pakistan that has respect for all religions races around the world - but i wont dare contribute a single tourist dollar until they end government sponsored support for terrorists against India, shut down their camps and renounce claims for Indian soil.
Alchemist Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 If all the Indians P**s on Pakistan, will there be catastrophic flood in Pakistan ??
Stuge Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 If all the Indians P**s on Pakistan' date=' will there be catastrophic flood in Pakistan ??[/quote'] heard this thing before its really disgusting to even think that way :(
Number Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 They talk about history of last 700 years , what about 20,000 years mauryas etc. but if they will put that much data on their memory it will explode, I guess.. after all their own history is just 60 years old.. didn't even exist 60 years ago.
jonas10 Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 They talk about history of last 700 years ' date=' what about 20,000 years mauryas etc. but if they will put that much data on their memory it will explode, I guess.. after all their own history is just 60 years old.. didn't even exist 60 years ago.[/quote'] Numb point is PAKISTANIS i.e. Indians from undivided India that were muslims have no proud history in that 700 year period. It was a time when India was overrun with foreign oppressors. Why on Earth does someone like Zaid Hamid take satisfaction in that?
Stuge Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 Why on Earth does someone like Zaid Hamid take satisfaction in that? Nope he is noT the only one.There are many like him .I even remember similar kind of line on India (like we ruled india for this many years) was used in "KHUDA ke Liya " a Pakistani film .They live in some kind of stupid delusion
Alchemist Posted May 7, 2011 Posted May 7, 2011 heard this thing before its really disgusting to even think that way :( And its OK to think like Hamid ?
bangladeshifan Posted May 13, 2011 Posted May 13, 2011 I have often heard about similar claims made by Pakistanis that there Hadith clearly mentions how Pakistan and Other Islamic forces will take over India in the future . Speaks a lot about what is being taught to them in there holy books : Hate against Non-Muslims . well that is not true. its some extrimists who use some hadiths out of context to mislead young ppl. in in mahabharat sri krishna told arjuneven fight with your relatives for the the sake of truth and justice now i can say sri krishna taught us to fight with relatives which is not true and taken out of context.
jonas10 Posted May 14, 2011 Posted May 14, 2011 marathas became very powerful by 17th century & controlled most of india as well as parts of modern pakistan ' date='sikh territory extended into pashtun areas in fact sikhs ruled pashtuns till 19th century.[/quote'] Reminds me of the 1965 war this retard Ayub Khan thought Pakistan would win based on his imaginary martial race beliefs totally forgetting the fact that India had Parsi, Gurkhas and of course the Sikhs. The irony the martial race belief these Paks like Ziad and Ayub believe in so dearly goes against the Pakistanis who all converted as they were forced by a stronger group while the Hindus/Buddhists who stayed so were able to withstand the foreign oppressors!
AfghanCricFan Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 This guy is such a joke :haha: to do with soviets ? Afghans were fighting them not Pakistanis All they did were after soviet war bringing conflict between Afghan so called leaders
Recommended Posts