Jump to content

Pietersen falls to left-arm spin on return


Recommended Posts

Posted
To be honest the Pakistan team on paper is around the same as the England team. So i think 2-0 Pakistan isn't that outrageous Hafeez = Strauss Taufeeq < Cook Azhar = Trott Younis > Pietersen Misbah > Bell U.Akmal > Morgan Akmal = Prior Gul > Broad Junaid = Anderson Ajmal > Swann Rehman > Panesar So it actually favours IMO Pakistan.
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted

What aspect of batting? Misbah is the better stroke player, the better defensive tukker, the player with the better technique and most of all Misbah can be relied upon whereas Bell will often collapse if the team is.

Posted
What aspect of batting? Misbah is the better stroke player, the better defensive tukker, the player with the better technique and most of all Misbah can be relied upon whereas Bell will often collapse if the team is.
pls go
Posted
What aspect of batting? Misbah is the better stroke player, the better defensive tukker, the player with the better technique and most of all Misbah can be relied upon whereas Bell will often collapse if the team is.
We will see which team collapses when the series starts and lol at Misbah's better stroke play :hysterical:
Posted
To be honest the Pakistan team on paper is around the same as the England team. So i think 2-0 Pakistan isn't that outrageous Hafeez = Strauss Taufeeq < Cook Azhar = Trott Younis > Pietersen Misbah > Bell U.Akmal > Morgan Akmal = Prior Gul > Broad Junaid = Anderson Ajmal > Swann Rehman > Panesar So it actually favours IMO Pakistan.
This is how I look at it. Hafeez < Strauss (Strauss a proper test match batsman, proven record) Taufeeq < Cook Azhar < Trott (Trott is one of the best around) Younis > Pietersen Misbah = Bell (Misbah and Bell should be equal in this series since it's played in UAE. U.Akmal > Morgan Akmal < Prior (Akmal just has 1 fifty to his name against Bangladesh) Gul > Broad Junaid = Anderson (Junaid inexperienced, Anderson struggles on flat wickets) Ajmal = Swann (Both will be pretty much equal here) Rehman > Panesar
Posted

GREAT LOGIC. Bell has averaged over 100 in 2011 on the difficult tracks of Aus and England, therefore on the roads of the UAE his batting will diminish to Misbahs level..

Posted

On paper Eng are much better. Only YK and Ajmal(arguably) can get into this Eng side. I think most of my countrymen are underestimating Eng. But I don't think it will be a one sided series the way most Eng and Indian fans are predicting. This Pak test line up is the most resilient team we had for years. These guys don't throw their wickets away. Add in the conditions where ball won't come on like it does in Eng/Aus or SA and it won't be easy for Eng to force the pace. Eng pace attack will have to bend their backs because you won't see any seam or swing. I expect Broad and Bresnon to make an impact. Swann will have his hands full against YK and Misbah.Expect him to trouble Azhar, taufeeq and asad. If I was a betting man I would back Eng to sneak a 1-0 win but a drawn series won't surprise me.

Posted
GREAT LOGIC. Bell has averaged over 100 in 2011 on the difficult tracks of Aus and England' date=' therefore on the roads of the UAE his batting will diminish to Misbahs level..[/quote'] Bell is one English batsman that I rate very highly. Expect him to be your best batsman in the series. As for wicket I think you missed the SL series. Two out of three surfaces had something for pacers on the first day. Misbah is nowhere near bells class but he is hard to dismiss and will frustrate your bowlers in this test series.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...