Trichromatic Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Ha...That clears it up a bit without BD' date=' ZIM in the mix.[/quote'] Is current WI team better than Zimbabwe of 2002?
SachDan Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Ha...That clears it up a bit without BD' date=' ZIM in the mix.[/quote'] ok
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Ha...That clears it up a bit without BD' date=' ZIM in the mix.[/quote'] Link Against the top 5 bowling sides since lax, Dravid and ganguly
Trichromatic Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Link Against the top 5 bowling sides since lax, Dravid and ganguly Sehwag with that avg and SR is just amazing.
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Sehwag with that avg and SR is just amazing. And he opens .... Amazing player :hatsoff:
carnish Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 can you provide those numbers? I think you are making stuff up. Also compare those numbers when both played together What a load of crap :facepalm: Atleast bother to check the numbers before posting. SRT has an average of 66 in the matches we won as opposed to 51 in matches we lost VVS has an average of 55 in won matches as opposed to 42 in lost/draw/Tied matches Win matches Lost/Draw/NR/Tied Ganeshran i was talking of lost matches average in 3rd or 4th innings not the whole match and i have provided the links of stats i was talking about... what crap crap you are saying... just babbling to prove your point is stupidity.. i was saying in 3rd and 4th innings of matches we lost tendulkar has a much better average and lachuu has a pathetic avg. and therefore most times he fails india has lost but in most of those matches sachin has performed but havent been able to take india across the line... simple logic...and i guess some other guys have given u a much better comparision of the averages you were talking by removing zimboks and bengoli craps... Mr two cents I have already given the stats for what i was claiming in post 882... check it..:--D
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Ganeshran i was talking of lost matches average in 3rd or 4th innings not the whole match and i have provided the links of stats i was talking about... what crap crap you are saying... just babbling to prove your point is stupidity.. i was saying in 3rd and 4th innings of matches we lost tendulkar has a much better average and lachuu has a pathetic avg. and therefore most times he fails india has lost but in most of those matches sachin has performed but havent been able to take india across the line... simple logic...and i guess some other guys have given u a much better comparision of the averages you were talking by removing zimboks and bengoli craps... Though VVS is a great player in the 2nd innings, to say that SRT has performed only when India has lost is a load of crap. Both VVS (28) and SRT (32) have a poor 2nd innings average in matches we lost. Its understandable that when 2 of the big 3 fail, we lose the match. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=2;team=6;template=results;type=batting In the matches that were drawn, VVS averages 76 compared to SRT's 59 in the second innings. This average is embellished by 9/14 not outs compared to SRT's 7/22 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=4;team=6;template=results;type=batting In won matches, VVS averages 68 to SRT and RDs 51.This part I agree with. He is one of our best 2nd innings player. But 2nd innings batting alone doesnt win you matches. A lot of those performances came on the back of the foundation laid in the first innings by SRT and Viru. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=1;team=6;template=results;type=batting http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=1;innings_number=2;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=1;team=6;template=results;type=batting
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Though VVS is a great player in the 2nd innings, to say that SRT has performed only when India has lost is a load of crap. Both VVS (28) and SRT (32) have a poor 2nd innings average in matches we lost. Its understandable that when 2 of the big 3 fail, we lose the match. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=2;team=6;template=results;type=batting In the matches that were drawn, VVS averages 76 compared to SRT's 59 in the second innings. This average is embellished by 9/14 not outs compared to SRT's 7/22 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=4;team=6;template=results;type=batting In won matches, VVS averages 68 to SRT and RDs 51.This part I agree with. He is one of our best 2nd innings player. But 2nd innings batting alone doesnt win you matches. A lot of those performances came on the back of the foundation laid in the first innings by SRT and Viru. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;innings_number=4;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=1;team=6;template=results;type=batting http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=1;innings_number=2;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;result=1;team=6;template=results;type=batting Ok, so where SRT doesn't measure up, cricket becomes a team game :hysterical: Time to make a badam shake
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Ok, so where SRT doesn't measure up, cricket becomes a team game :hysterical: Time to make a badam shake Given your statistical genius and multiimillion dollar fortune, Dont you have forecasting models to create and blanket statements to make :hysterical::hysterical: http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=261363 1. Not arbitrary as on cricinfo you can select the last decade and it calculates back from today .... If you want to put in different dates go ahead and do it 2. Perfo against top 5 bowling sides :--D I have heard the blanket statement you make on forums a lot. In fact have been hearing since a decade in a variety of context. Rarely, do the person making those statement realize or make an effort to understand what's presented. And this has been a main problem with posters from subcontinent. They just make blanket statements w/o even knowing what's on the table because they probably saw someone else make that statement :hysterical: That's the fun part about debating with those in subcontinent :p I may make blanket statements but it takes a lot more to understand their depth (I don't expect most folks to understand its depth because many of those who are capable of understanding the depth wouldn't waste their time on onlline forums.)
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Given your statistical genius and multiimillion dollar fortune, Dont you have forecasting models to create and blanket statements to make :hysterical::hysterical: http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=261363 Statistical genius, no, I am not that great .... Don't forget, I also have to spend my multi-million (or billion or whatever) fortune to create opportunities for folks like you so that they can finally afford to go to places like Bhutan :hysterical: * I found a toy to play on this forum with (ganesharan) *
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Statistical genius, no, I am not that great .... Don't forget, I also have to spend my multi-million (or billion or whatever) fortune to create opportunities for folks like you so that they can finally afford to go to places like Bhutan :hysterical: * I found a toy to play on this forum with (ganesharan) * You actually took that seriously :hysterical::hysterical:
pensionplan Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Is current WI team better than Zimbabwe of 2002?Yes
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 You actually took that seriously :hysterical::hysterical: Go take a badam shake (to help you see if that was taken seriously) :hysterical:
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Go take a badam shake (to help you see if that was taken seriously) :hysterical: You actually consider yourself a statistical genius - dont deny that now. :hysterical::hysterical: Its pretty clear when you make pompous statements like I may make blanket statements but it takes a lot more to understand their depth (I don't expect most folks to understand its depth because many of those who are capable of understanding the depth wouldn't waste their time on onlline forums.) That's the beauty of the internet. Here is a guy who is paid 1000s of dollars to make the right call (or the company and his job is on the line), resolve complex issues, etc (working in pressure situations) but on the internet he is being advised on what right by a bunch of folks who probably are getting started in life
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 A gem to justify RPT :hysterical: :hysterical: The absence of a complex system that you need doesn't stop the process of forecasting. People use the system they have access too. Like in olden days people made fire without lighters. Nor will an absence of proper system based on standardized parameters stop people from proclaiming someone as the greatest[
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 You actually consider yourself a statistical genius - dont deny that now. :hysterical::hysterical: Its pretty clear when you make pompous statements like yeah, I do .... which is why I didn't start a blog like 'Coffee, ......" to do some dumb analysis after eating badams :hehe:
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 A gem to justify RPT :hysterical: :hysterical: Look at moron try hard to compete .... had to run to other threads to get something out :hysterical: side effects of having badams, I guess :hmmmm:
ganeshran Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Look at moron try hard to compete .... had to run to other threads to get something out :hysterical: side effects of having badams, I guess :hmmmm: You actually went to my blog to pick text to compete :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
SachDan Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 Look at moron try hard to compete .... had to run to other threads to get something out :hysterical: You actually went to my blog to pick text to compete :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
zen Posted November 19, 2011 Posted November 19, 2011 You actually went to my blog to pick text to compete :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Now I have to compete with like of you! :hysterical: Internet helps creating false egos .... tommorrow a peon will also compete with CEO because they happen to post on the same board :hehe: In case you missed the point: you adverstise your blog in every post you make. That's an open invitation .... no body has to run to go there like you :--D
Recommended Posts