Sir_Afridi Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 "Just like India player Amit Mishra in the first innings, Ravi stood his ground and gestured to both the umpires on being given out," ICC match referee Jeff Crowe said. http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/Rampaul-fined-for-dissent-20110624
Serani Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 No comments on the "racist" match referee's? Come on guys this is clearly racist against the guy of Indian decent Ravi Rampaul.
Cricketics Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 No comments on the "racist" match referee's? Come on guys this is clearly racist against the guy of Indian decent Ravi Rampaul. Ya.. we are too sad rite now... Don't have any words to say
Sachinism Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Racist umpire, just because he's is more Indian than the rest of the WI team :headshake:
jairamesh Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/Rampaul-fined-for-dissent-20110624 Racist decision and at the same Sammy gets away only with caution. Talk about double standards. :cheer:
Deleted_User_1 Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Serani's native team is phaacked and his adopted team will be phaacked soon!! Stick around so that we can make fun of you. :haha:
akshayxyz Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Should rename himself - Ram Broad or RamBrose or something like that.
ganeshran Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Good decision. Finally some rules are being applied consistently
yoda Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Not sure why match referee has to refer to Amit Mishra incident in this case, unless he is essentially implying that cause we fined Mishra, we gotta fine you too, or else I would look like a complete tool.
Serani Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Maybe he is just outling the skin colour of people that get fined.
ganeshran Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 Not sure why match referee has to refer to Amit Mishra incident in this case' date=' unless he is essentially implying that cause we fined Mishra, we gotta fine you too, or else I would look like a complete tool.[/quote'] Thats true. They would look biased if they fine one and ignore another. IMO both incidents were too minor for fines to be handed out. DIssent is what pointing showed to Aleem Dar in the Ashes test - incidents like those should be dealt with strictly.
Ram Posted June 24, 2011 Posted June 24, 2011 I feel for Rampaul. The dude was trying to save/win a test match with the bat and was batting reasonably well on a 30+ score. As a batsmen who was actually facing the ball that reared from a length, he probably knew better than anyone else, that the ball crossed him above the shoulder height. Plus, if you consider the fact that 2 bouncers had already been bowled previously in the over, you can understand why he was hanging around, asking the umpires to re-consider.
phaedrus Posted June 26, 2011 Posted June 26, 2011 why was that dissent? he just asked if the ball was a no ball or not! ridiculous.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now