Blue Panther Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Yeah,For the first time i believe our pace attack is better than pakistan. All our pacers are wicket takers and i dont think pakistan has a pace attack to match ours. Except for gul and wahab riaz i dont think pak's bowlers are wicket takers and i dont hear any good pacer coming out of pak. I know pakistanis won't accept this fact, but i think this england tour will give the answer for it.:two_thumbs_up:
deepak_sach Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Even GUl and Riaz are pedestrian bowlers not able to take wickets in tests. Hope Serani will agree:cantstop:
gult Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Without the cheats Asif and Amir, theirs is just a standard attack.
deepak_sach Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 How come Serani,Rana or His Majesty Sir_Afridi has not posted ....
Trichromatic Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Yeah' date=For the first time Eye opener for you : Since 2004, pace bowlers for India Matches........81 Wickets.........628 Avg.............. 34.28 SR.................60.9 BBI................7/59 BBM...............12/126 Econ..............3.37 Pakistan Matches.........59 Wickets......... 531 Avg................36.13 SR..................61.8 BBI.................6/41 BBM...............11/71 Econ..............3.50 Congratulations for underestimating our bowling.
Blue Panther Posted July 13, 2011 Author Posted July 13, 2011 Eye opener for you : Since 2004, pace bowlers for India Matches........81 Wickets.........628 Avg.............. 34.28 SR.................60.9 BBI................7/59 BBM...............12/126 Econ..............3.37 Pakistan Matches.........59 Wickets......... 531 Avg................36.13 SR..................61.8 BBI.................6/41 BBM...............11/71 Econ..............3.50 :omg::two_thumbs_up:
Chandan Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Is this thread again in reply of some thread posted somewhere on other forum? Otherwise, I don't see where Pakistan comes now in comparison. You can compare the attacks of England and India as the series between the two is coming up. But comparison in this thread is simply useless. I'm closing it.
Sachinism Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Make sure this thread doesn't turn into a mindless bashing thread
therocky Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Paki bowlers are overrated as crap, Akram and Waqar were s*** compared to likes of Ambrose/Donald
Trichromatic Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Paki bowlers are overrated as crap' date=' Akram and Waqar were s*** compared to likes of Ambrose/Donald[/quote'] Thread is not for overall comparison, rather it's for this current generation of bowlers. How did Akram and Waqar come into the picture. They retired in 2003. Btw, even statistically Akram and Waqar were as good as Ambrose or Donald. I would say that Indian bowling in recent year is highly underrated. Blame ODIs for this. In test matches they have constantly improved in last decade.
therocky Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Thread is not for overall comparison, rather it's for this current generation of bowlers. How did Akram and Waqar come into the picture. They retired in 2003. Btw, even statistically Akram and Waqar were as good as Ambrose or Donald. I would say that Indian bowling in recent year is highly underrated. Blame ODIs for this. In test matches they have constantly improved in last decade. Ok, current generation bowlers compared India is miles ahead of Pakis. Zaheer alone can bowl out WI faster than it takes 5 Paki bowlers combined. Get in Ishant ahead of clowns like Sreesanth and our bowling attack will be the best
Ahmed Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Eh India and pace? I am afraid the discussion ends already there.
urbestfriend Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Well...I know where this thread heading to...Why was it opened after it was closed by Chandan?
Switchblade Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Well...I know where this thread heading to...Why was it opened after it was closed by Chandan? +1
nospam Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Eh India and pace? I am afraid the discussion ends already there. +1
Blue Panther Posted July 13, 2011 Author Posted July 13, 2011 Eh India and pace? I am afraid the discussion ends already there. the current pak bowling line up is medicore. india still has good bench strength in pace attack.
phaedrus Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Is this thread again in reply of some thread posted somewhere on other forum? Otherwise, I don't see where Pakistan comes now in comparison. You can compare the attacks of England and India as the series between the two is coming up. But comparison in this thread is simply useless. I'm closing it. :two_thumbs_up:
Blue Panther Posted July 13, 2011 Author Posted July 13, 2011 Is this thread again in reply of some thread posted somewhere on other forum? Otherwise, I don't see where Pakistan comes now in comparison. You can compare the attacks of England and India as the series between the two is coming up. But comparison in this thread is simply useless. I'm closing it. well, its argued that pak had better pace attack in the past, for the first time i feel like our pacers are better then their's. y cant we compare it? should we discuss only abt england vs india ? thats not fair.
Sachinism Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Well...I know where this thread heading to...Why was it opened after it was closed by Chandan? Are we really that immature?
Sid Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Indian pacers are under rated and Pak pacers are over rated. /thread :--D
Recommended Posts