wobblydoggy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Get your Cricket knowledge right' date=' Turners and Flat wickets are different.[/quote'] Indian wickets are usually bloody flat, weather they take spin is another matter
koolkarts Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Yep and flat as pancakes:hysterical: :hysterical: Of course, when England bat it's a turning/spinning dusty wicket, but when India bat it's the flattest wicket in the world, a road, or whatever you want to call it. Love the double standards :haha:
Andy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Indian wickets are usually bloody flat' date=' weather they take spin is another matter[/quote'] When its a Turner, you cant call it flat unless you are biased. Then English wickets despite seaming can be called Flat.
wobblydoggy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 :hysterical: Of course, when England bat it's a turning/spinning dusty wicket, but when India bat it's the flattest wicket in the world, a road, or whatever you want to call it. Love the double standards :haha: In the past we have not had the spinners to exploit it or the batsmen to cope with it. We have good reverse swingers in our side and the best spinner in the world and we bat deep I think we will give you a good game
wobblydoggy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 When its a Turner' date=' you cant call it flat unless you are biased. Then English wickets despite seaming can be called Flat.[/quote'] English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches
Ultimate_Game Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches You lost whatever credibility you had with that post... check Tendulkar's stats away from home and in Aus and Eng and we will talk.
Andy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches So only those with Bounce and Pace are not Pankakes and the ones that Turns are Flat ones because your players cant play spin? If English batsmen can score heavily on those tracks why do they struggle everytime they play on rank turners? Tendulkar has scored runs all over the world. Before this series You beat us last in 96.
wobblydoggy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 You lost whatever credibility you had with that post... check Tendulkar's stats away from home and in Aus and Eng and we will talk. He makes hay at home and you know it
Ultimate_Game Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 He makes hay at home and you know it Like averaging 60+ in Eng, 55+ in Aus and actually scoring more 100s away from home :omg:
koolkarts Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches I'd check your facts out before I come up with such audacious quotes. Sachin has 1522 runs in Aus vs Aus in tests at an average of 58.83 (India last toured Australia in 07/08 when they were still the undisputed number 1 side) Sachin has 1461 runs in England vs England at an average of 54.11 So yeah whatever. Continue to make up statements like that, and your credibility on this forum will continue to deteriorate, and become even more wobbly, if you'll mind the pun. :winky:
Asoka Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches Check out Tendu's avg in Aus,RSA,NZ,Eng you retard.
King Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English, SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches Is that so??? List the number of runs scored by your several English batsman during their time in India. Guess what? You will be surprised.
wobblydoggy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Like averaging 60+ in Eng' date=' 55+ in Aus and actually scoring more 100s away from home :omg:[/quote'] Bangladesh,Sri and Pakistan is all like playing at home for him. And yes he has got good records elsewhere, but if we had a chance to play more on such wickets our batsmens stats would be higher imho
Ultimate_Game Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Bangladesh,Sri and Pakistan is all like playing at home for him. And yes he has got good records elsewhere, but if we had a chance to play more on such wickets our batsmens stats would be higher imho Well Tendulkar still somehow averages higher than any English batsman in Aus & Eng with more 100s than any English batsman. Care to elaborate how? Maybe Tendulkar plays on "home" pitches or at "home" even though India plays in Aus and Eng. Or maybe the stats have been tampered with on BCCI's behest just so Tendulkar actually looks good abroad :cantstop:
Andy Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 Bangladesh,Sri and Pakistan is all like playing at home for him. And yes he has got good records elsewhere, but if we had a chance to play more on such wickets our batsmens stats would be higher imho So playing in AUS, SA and ENG are playing at home for the Brits too? :winky:
Jersey #10 Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 It's not called arrogant if you can back it up with performance.
Kumar Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 In the past we have not had the spinners to exploit it or the batsmen to cope with it. We have good reverse swingers in our side and the best spinner in the world and we bat deep I think we will give you a good game only sub continent spinners succeed in the SC! ha you really think swann can do wonders in SC where warne struggled like a baby?!
Kumar Posted August 13, 2011 Posted August 13, 2011 English' date=' SA and Aussi wickets have pace and bounce, Indian ones are like mattresses which is why [b']Tendulkar has so many runs. There are several english batsmen who would ammass such figures in the modern game playing on those pitches :cantstop: if you look at his centuries, theres almost a perfect balance between centuries away and home and majority in tests are away please dont underestimate or belittle SRT, hes twice the batsmen your country ever produced and Id rather believe a commentator like richie benuad and players like warne and hadleee that SRT is the best theyve seen as opposed to some little ***** from England trolling this site in every possible way
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now