Jump to content

To those doubting how good our Test Side is


Recommended Posts

Posted
Yes he was ' date='and rightly so as lee proved in effective in later tours of sub continent but point is the same attack did well against every team they were winning only india managed to draw the series.[/quote'] How it was same attack. No Kasper, no warne, no Lee, and no mcgrath.
Posted
I never said India performed as well as Aus did abroad. I only said that India has performed well abroad and so has SA. And it has nothing to do with performance since being number 1. It has everything to do with performance leading upto and maintaining the number 1 position. India since 2007 WC have done very well all over the world as have SA. England needs to do that. And like I said they have already ticked off SA and Aus in their abroad section. Let's wait to see how they perform in SL and Ind. Again, not taking anything away from the fact that England are number 1 today. they damn deservedly are. The challenge is how long will they maintain it. Let's wait and see.
So England need to draw in Aus (tick-had a win)' draw in SA (tick-already done so), draw in SL and draw in Ind? More than half way there?
Posted
No, you are wrong. Kasper was not their first choice seamer ever. He mostly played when any of Mcgrath, Lee, and Gillespie were injured. Kasper only has 38 tests to his name and an average of 32. This was the only phase where Brett Lee had to sit out and that to because Lee was injured during that time and before and was not in his full flow.
I think you two can stop fighting and watch what Brett Lee hs to say for himself about that tour. Here - http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/528324.html
Posted
we did better than eng did on tour of sa and the side eng beat in aus we whitewashed them in india .
Worst post ever. Firstly england were leading the series in SA right until the last test when SA were forced to gamble on a pitch where if you won the toss you won the game, simple SA won the toss. And you whitewashed Australia, in a 2 match test series, and Aus would have won the first test if not for a shocker from the umpire not giving mishra LBW. Yes great comprehensive "whitewash" against Aus.
Posted
Worst post ever. Firstly england were leading the series in SA right until the last test when SA were forced to gamble on a pitch where if you won the toss you won the game, simple SA won the toss. And you whitewashed Australia, in a 2 match test series, and Aus would have won the first test if not for a shocker from the umpire not giving mishra LBW. Yes great comprehensive "whitewash" against Aus.
You mean Ohja. And surely you miring the fact that Ishant was given out wrongly 5 minutes before that dismissal. Come at me Bro :two_thumbs_up:
Posted
Worst post ever. Firstly england were leading the series in SA right until the last test when SA were forced to gamble on a pitch where if you won the toss you won the game, simple SA won the toss. And you whitewashed Australia, in a 2 match test series, and Aus would have won the first test if not for a shocker from the umpire not giving mishra LBW. Yes great comprehensive "whitewash" against Aus.
Though I agree with our not so comprehensive "whitewash" against Aussies but its also a fact that we played better than the Pommies in SA.England were on the verge of a defeat twice ,but we had a much respectable draw ,not depending on some onions or potatoes to draw the match :hatsoff:
Posted
Worst post ever. Firstly england were leading the series in SA right until the last test when SA were forced to gamble on a pitch where if you won the toss you won the game, simple SA won the toss. And you whitewashed Australia, in a 2 match test series, and Aus would have won the first test if not for a shocker from the umpire not giving mishra LBW. Yes great comprehensive "whitewash" against Aus.
we would have won the first test at Lords had Pieterson give out in the first innings, the runs he scored was the difference. :--D:--D:--D:--D
Posted
we would have won the first test at Lords had Pieterson give out in the first innings' date=' the runs he scored was the difference. :--D:--D:--D:--D[/quote'] doesnt change the fact that India got their fat asses handed to them:haha::haha::haha::haha:
Posted
doesnt change the fact that India got their fat asses handed to them:haha::haha::haha::haha:
Another day another time, I would have given u a fit reply. But sadly, our team hasnt done anything notable to be defended. Much like ur Pakistani team, I must say !
Posted
doesnt change the fact that India got their fat asses handed to them:haha::haha::haha::haha:
well you are moron, that response was specifically for the dude Serani as he brought umpire decisions in a picture. Its fact had Pieterson given out at 49, that game would have been real close and may be we would won it and things would have been different. just don't butt in when you don't understand why I mentioned those things.
Posted
Another day another time' date=' I would have given u a fit reply. But sadly, our team hasnt done anything notable to be defended. Much like ur Pakistani team, I must say ![/quote'] once again i dont support Pakistan i support England!
Posted
well you are moron, that response was specifically for the dude Serani as he brought umpire decisions in a picture. Its fact had Pieterson given out at 49, that game would have been real close and may be we would won it and things would have been different. just don't butt in when you don't understand why I mentioned those things.
dude ur the moron for make lame excuses for Dhoni and his superstars

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...