luvablubba Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Are you taking the piss? Stokes moved to England when he was 6 and the only time he has been back to NZ was in the U19 WC (where he smashed India around) Chat **** get hit. this
Trichromatic Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Well if that is how it came across that was a mistake' date=' was just making the point that its good for the team to give youth its chance even at the expense of [b']'star' players. Who are those star ODI players?
Serani Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Alrite, heres some more background on the "import" that is Stokes. Turns out he was actually 12 when he moved over but nvm. Perhaps his background will help him cope. His father, Ged, is a former New Zealand rugby league international who brought the family to England in 2003 when he was offered the coach's job at Workington. Ben, born in Christchurch – although with no trace of a Kiwi accent, and ambitions only to play for England – was 12, and while he had played a little cricket, he was more interested in following his dad into rugby. While some of his mates might have imagined themselves being Flintoff, such fantasies never crossed his mind. "I'd played rugby more in New Zealand and when I came here it was my number one sport, what I wanted to do. I joined up with Broughton Red Rose, a local rugby league club near where we lived. I did not start to think about cricket seriously until I was 14 and I can't say I had a hero I wanted to be like. There are players I admire but no one I wanted to emulate." So he came over without ever really playing cricket before? Poor NZC putting all that time and effort to nurture a player and then England just buy him, heartbreaking :giggle: Haters gonna hate, stokes is yet another product of english cricket.
Trichromatic Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 ^^ KP. Bah, I thought you'll throw 4-5 names. Btw, KP averages only 22 in last 3 years.
luvablubba Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Alrite, heres some more background on the "import" that is Stokes. Turns out he was actually 12 when he moved over but nvm. So he came over without ever really playing cricket before? Poor NZC putting all that time and effort to nurture a player and then England just buy him, heartbreaking :giggle: Haters gonna hate, stokes is yet another product of english cricket. good research. It's all nonsense anyway, can't blame England for people wanting to live here, not like we hold a gun to people's head and say play for us!
Serani Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 What would be more strange is actually if Stokes played for NZ, thats when you could accuse someone of "poaching" like the Indians love to say on here. Talent spotted by Durham and put through there very good academy, breaks into the first team and performs very well. Then he would choose to play for NZ despite not being back their for 8 years and having played no cricket in NZ. Yet somehow England have imported this Stokes, they knew when he was 11 he was going to be a good cricketer so got some little rugby league club to employ his dad as a cover for Ben to come over, genius.
Cricket Tragic Posted August 26, 2011 Author Posted August 26, 2011 Are you taking the piss? Stokes moved to England when he was 6 and the only time he has been back to NZ was in the U19 WC (where he smashed India around) Chat **** get hit. That is exactly what he was doing.
maniac Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Are you taking the piss? Stokes moved to England when he was 6 and the only time he has been back to NZ was in the U19 WC (where he smashed India around) Chat **** get hit. All right dude Since he grew his pubes in England...we will consider him English
maniac Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Alrite, heres some more background on the "import" that is Stokes. Turns out he was actually 12 when he moved over but nvm. So he came over without ever really playing cricket before? Poor NZC putting all that time and effort to nurture a player and then England just buy him, heartbreaking :giggle: Haters gonna hate, stokes is yet another product of english cricket. .So a kid moves in from NZL at 12 and starts playing list A games at 17 and probably some minor league stuff before that very well reflects the structure of cricket at English domestc,Club and school level
maniac Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Seems this clown is actually srs. srsly srs. Alright you cannot make a f**** point you get into name calling??? Stokes may have moved to England at whatever age I don't give a damn... All i can do is marvel at the coincidence or miracle that in the last few years young lads who move to England from other countries with a cricketing culture suddenly seem to make a way in to the England squad....
maniac Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Alastair Cook, James Anderson, Ian Bell, Ravi Bopara, Tim Bresnan, Stuart Borad, Jade Dernbach, Steven Finn, Craig Kieswetter, Eoin Morgan, Samit Patel, Ben Stokes, Graeme Swann, Jonathan Trott. This has been discussed to death on these forums and I don't want to get in to a debate with you...Is it just a coincidence that a Kiwi born kid is a part of the squad Notice the pattern here...I have not even considered Bopara and Patel as they are born and brought up there and that would be a racial thing to do
Serani Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 Alright you cannot make a f**** point you get into name calling??? Stokes may have moved to England at whatever age I don't give a damn... All i can do is marvel at the coincidence or miracle that in the last few years young lads who move to England from other countries with a cricketing culture suddenly seem to make a way in to the England squad.... Well I have clearly made my point(s). Alrite, heres some more background on the "import" that is Stokes. Turns out he was actually 12 when he moved over but nvm. So he came over without ever really playing cricket before? Poor NZC putting all that time and effort to nurture a player and then England just buy him, heartbreaking :giggle: Haters gonna hate, stokes is yet another product of english cricket. What would be more strange is actually if Stokes played for NZ, thats when you could accuse someone of "poaching" like the Indians love to say on here. Talent spotted by Durham and put through there very good academy, breaks into the first team and performs very well. Then he would choose to play for NZ despite not being back their for 8 years and having played no cricket in NZ. Yet somehow England have imported this Stokes, they knew when he was 11 he was going to be a good cricketer so got some little rugby league club to employ his dad as a cover for Ben to come over, genius. I guess you are just advocating that you have to be born in a country and stay there your whole life, oh wait you live in Chicago. And what is this magic coincidental conspiracy theory you are pointing towards? Obviously if lads come from cricket playing countries they are more likely to play cricket as a lad in england. Brb Somalian immigrants just starting to play cricket because it seems an english thing to do.
Trichromatic Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 All i can do is marvel at the coincidence or miracle that in the last few years young lads who move to England from other countries with a cricketing culture suddenly seem to make a way in to the England squad.... 1992 WC Out of 11 players who played final for England, 6 were not born in England. Wondering why everyone is so much concerned about this now and why no one questioned this earlier.
Serani Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 1992 WC Out of 11 players who played final for England, 6 were not born in England. Wondering why everyone is so much concerned about this now and why no one questioned this earlier. But england were **** so nobody cared.
maniac Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 1992 WC Out of 11 players who played final for England, 6 were not born in England. Wondering why everyone is so much concerned about this now and why no one questioned this earlier. That is bcoz out of the 6 players Hick was Zimbabwean and started playing before Zim was without test status and didn't play much competitive cricket Lamb,Smith SA and started playing for ENG when SA was banned and as cricketers had the right to make their living we can give them the leeway Pringle born in Kenya...Self explanatory Lewis and Defraites would not make it to WI squad in the 80's or early 90's even in their dreams...
Serani Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 You bolded Eoin Morgan, Ireland are without test status just like Zimbabwe were with Hick. The South Africans have tried to escape from a racist quota system which would have prevented them from reaching SA squad. As cricketers they have the right to maker their living. Now if you could somehow tell me why exactly Stokes should play for NZ rather than England?
Trichromatic Posted August 26, 2011 Posted August 26, 2011 That is bcoz out of the 6 players Hick was Zimbabwean and started playing before Zim was without test status and didn't play much competitive cricket Lamb,Smith SA and started playing for ENG when SA was banned and as cricketers had the right to make their living we can give them the leeway Pringle born in Kenya...Self explanatory Lewis and Defraites would not make it to WI squad in the 80's or early 90's even in their dreams... So, basically they moved to England for their own personal gains. Aren't the players choosing England for their personal gains in recent years also?
Serani Posted August 27, 2011 Posted August 27, 2011 Maybe the username of "maniac" explains all but I do not understand why someone who moves to england as a boy would then represent their country of birth in international cricket. We live in a globalised world. People move around.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now