Moman211 Posted August 27, 2011 Author Posted August 27, 2011 Well' date=' before the test series started, Swann was being hyped to be the nemesis of Indian batting. After his clear failure in the first 3 tests , this is your response that he wasnt required ? Hahaha..Laughable stuff to say the least ! Height of hypocrisy and insecurity...English traits I must say :finger::finger::finger:[/quote'] Well yes he didnt need to play well because the seamers did the job so dont know whats so funny!:finger::finger:
Midfielder Posted August 27, 2011 Posted August 27, 2011 You high or something! Harbhajan best in the world!:giggle: gimme a break! Good tea, coffee and lots of coca-cola (occasionally cheap wine).
Rightarmfast Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Well yes he didnt need to play well because the seamers did the job so dont know whats so funny!:finger::finger: So you mean he was hiding behind the seamers with his tail covering his behind for the fear of being f***ck*d and yet trying to call himself No 1 ? hahahahaha !!! Real Funny :finger::finger:
CG Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Well yes he didnt need to play well because the seamers did the job so dont know whats so funny!:finger::finger: Its not if india were bowled out for less than 200 in any innings,he got enough chances and was hammered by indians in first three tests and in oval also conceeded over 100 runs.
Moman211 Posted August 28, 2011 Author Posted August 28, 2011 Its not if india were bowled out for less than 200 in any innings' date=he got enough chances and was hammered by indians in first three tests and in oval also conceeded over 100 runs. yeah just that they didnt score over 300 in 8 innings!:giggle:
Trichromatic Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Avg no of overs per match for Swann (during whole career) - 41 Avg no of overs per match (during Ind-Eng series) - 36. He got enough chances, I think.
Dravid_TheWall Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 first of all he wasnt needed as the seamers rolled the Indian batsmen in the first 3 tests and btw did Harbhajan and mishra do any better? when he was given a decent pitch to work with he took 9 wickets so why dont go check ur facts! who was to made to look pathetic England or India? But if he was the world's no1 spinner as english fans claim you would still expect him to maintain control even on pitches that didn't favour spin. He failed at even that, in the 2nd test I think he went for 72 runs from 12 overs...crap figures for even ODI's. No point comparing him to Bhajji who has been on the decline for several years or someone like Mishra.
Moman211 Posted August 28, 2011 Author Posted August 28, 2011 But if he was the world's no1 spinner as english fans claim you would still expect him to maintain control even on pitches that didn't favour spin. He failed at even that' date=' in the 2nd test I think he went for 72 runs from 12 overs...crap figures for even ODI's. No point comparing him to Bhajji who has been on the decline for several years or someone like Mishra.[/quote'] thats the thing i wasnt comparing him to anyone i was pointing out how England have become better with him and how the traditional spinner powerhouses Aus,India and Sri Lanka have declined.
Moman211 Posted August 28, 2011 Author Posted August 28, 2011 But if he was the world's no1 spinner as english fans claim you would still expect him to maintain control even on pitches that didn't favour spin. He failed at even that' date=' in the 2nd test I think he went for 72 runs from 12 overs...crap figures for even ODI's. No point comparing him to Bhajji who has been on the decline for several years or someone like Mishra.[/quote'] btw i keep hearing oh hes not the best in the world hes mediocre. ok then tell me someone who is better?
Crookbond Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 I just feel people miss one important side of the argument. No foreign spinner including Shane Warne, Muttiah Muralitharan and Saqlain Mushtaq(to a lesser extent) were successful in the sub-continent (specially India). Currently, one would have to agree that Swann is the best spinner but his litmus test will come when he plays the Indians in their backyard. Going by the look of his performance in England against India, I am personally not bullish on Swann. I think he will make be decent but not sure whether England can rely on him as an attacking option. A full strength India might thwart him before he gets into the groove.
Trichromatic Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 I just feel people miss one important side of the argument. No foreign spinner including Shane Warne' date=' Muttiah Muralitharan and Saqlain Mushtaq(to a lesser extent) were successful in the sub-continent (specially India). [b']Currently, one would have to agree that Swann is the best spinner but his litmus test will come when he plays the Indians in their backyard. Going by the look of his performance in England against India, I am personally not bullish on Swann. I think he will make be decent but not sure whether England can rely on him as an attacking option. A full strength India might thwart him before he gets into the groove. Many people are arguing about his performance to say that he is not best. Well, being best is relative. If he is average spinner then other spinners are below average. As simple as that. At least he is best performer these days. I think pacers will be still remain main bowlers for England even in India.
Crookbond Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Many people are arguing about his performance to say that he is not best. Well, being best is relative. If he is average spinner then other spinners are below average. As simple as that. At least he is best performer these days. I think pacers will be still remain main bowlers for England even in India. Definitely, he's the best two in the lot currently. I rate Ajmal equally with him though he hasn't had a lot of Test matches to play. 11 versus Swann's 36. I hope Pakistan get more Test matches to play. Harbhajan has definitely lost his strike capability.
Trichromatic Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Definitely' date=' he's the best two in the lot currently. I rate Ajmal equally with him though he hasn't had a lot of Test matches to play. 11 versus Swann's 36. I hope Pakistan get more Test matches to play. Harbhajan has definitely lost his strike capability.[/quote'] It also shows the condition of spin bowling in cricket. Batting is dominating too much and bowling is going in the gutter. Best batsmen are averaging close to 80-90 every year and spinners are struggling to get their averages below 30. @ era of flat tracks.
fineleg Posted August 28, 2011 Posted August 28, 2011 Swann is not the best spinner. It is a myth perpetuated by lack of cricketing knowledge.' date=' more like an acquired taste. If he bowls in India he probably would not be even the third best in the domestic ratings. Harbhajan is the best. Hands down and I am dead seriious. :haha::haha::haha:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now