Number Posted October 23, 2011 Posted October 23, 2011 Sir Alex's wife wakes him in bed saying "wake up dear it's 7 Alex Ferguson says "what? They've scored one more"
mishra Posted October 23, 2011 Posted October 23, 2011 Evans attracting red card was very follish. At the time score was 0-1 On side note, Similar thing happened when Russian oil money came Chelsea. Same is going to happen to city. They wont last more than 2 years
Bradman99 Posted October 24, 2011 Posted October 24, 2011 This City is side is blessed with amazing attacking talent. Any team which finishes above them will have done very, very well. Man Utd were stupid for throwing men forward like they did, they were just gifting City goals.
Sachin=GOD Posted October 25, 2011 Posted October 25, 2011 City may have won a battle but United are going to win the war :bow:
ganeshran Posted October 25, 2011 Author Posted October 25, 2011 ManU is back baby...well on its way to beat Aldershot B->
BeautifulGame Posted October 26, 2011 Posted October 26, 2011 Cost of City side vs Cost of Utd Side for the match day when city won 6-1 including subs: United De Gea-£18m. Smalling-£10.5m. Evans-Free. Ferdinand-£30m. Evra-£7m. Anderson-£20.3m. Fletcher-Free. Nani-£17.3m. Young-£18m. Rooney-£28m. Welbeck-Free. Subs: Lindegaard-£3.5m. Fabio-£2.5m. Jones-£18m. Park-£4m. Valencia-£18m. Berbatov-£30.75m. Hernandez-£7m. Total-£232.85m. City Hart-£600k. Richards-Free. Kompany-£6m. Lescott-£24m. Clichy-£7m. Barry-£12m. Yaya-£19.5m. Milner-£16m. Aguero-£38m. Silva-£24m. Balotelli-£24m. Subs: Pantilimon-Free. Kolarov-£17m. Toure-£14m. Nasri-£25m. Zabaleta-£5.5m. De Jong-£18m. Dzeko-£27m. Total-£277.6m.
Bradman99 Posted October 26, 2011 Posted October 26, 2011 Shows City are actually quite smart in the market, they don't pay over the odds. Except for Lescott!! Haha but I guess Kompany makes up for that.
mishra Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 ^ What that list doesnt show is cost of Nasri and Tevez. Both would have been in playing 11 of any team... It will be interesting to know the weekly wages of these players.... It also doesnt show how much losses City has been taking against poor buys and xfrs in last couple of years.. And anyone who knows if you score say 95% in a exam how difficult is is to score next 1-2% to score say 96%- 97% in the exam. And 277 mill >>> 232 mill
hiha Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 city would get smacked by d new fair play rules....... united shot past shots 3-0 united :y manchester *****y take :finger:
Andy Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 Livp'l ,****,CFC fans,celebrating City beating United,is like celebrating when another man gives ur wife an orgasm just coz you couldn't.| Rent boys couldnt beat QPR at SB .
BeautifulGame Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 city would get smacked by d new fair play rules....... Fair play rules wont make any difference to City unfortunately.
Bradman99 Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 ^ What that list doesnt show is cost of Nasri and Tevez. Both would have been in playing 11 of any team... It will be interesting to know the weekly wages of these players.... It also doesnt show how much losses City has been taking against poor buys and xfrs in last couple of years.. And anyone who knows if you score say 95% in a exam how difficult is is to score next 1-2% to score say 96%- 97% in the exam. And 277 mill >>> 232 mill Well actually it does show Nasri and they paid 25mil for him. I think that he is well worth that. As for Tevez, what did they pay for him around 30mil? Again, he is worth that.
nospam Posted October 27, 2011 Posted October 27, 2011 This City is side is blessed with amazing attacking talent. Any team which finishes above them will have done very, very well. Man Utd were stupid for throwing men forward like they did, they were just gifting City goals. Same mistake that Arsenal made at Old Trafford... :(
BERGKAMP Posted October 28, 2011 Posted October 28, 2011 it is a good point, arsenal were down 3-1 at half time and instead of limiting the damage which we could have done, wenger took off our defensive midfielder coquelin and bought on an attacker in oxlade and went for goals and all out attack to try and salvage the game. in the process we got picked off by united and ended up with a crazy scoreline. similar to the 6-1, fergy could have gone defensive and lost by only 1 or 2 goals but it is not in the dna and mentality of managers like fergy and wenger to play anything other than attacking football. both 8-2 and 6-1 are slightly misleading scorelines.
BeautifulGame Posted October 28, 2011 Posted October 28, 2011 it is a good point, arsenal were down 3-1 at half time and instead of limiting the damage which we could have done, wenger took off our defensive midfielder coquelin and bought on an attacker in oxlade and went for goals and all out attack to try and salvage the game. in the process we got picked off by united and ended up with a crazy scoreline. similar to the 6-1, fergy could have gone defensive and lost by only 1 or 2 goals but it is not in the dna and mentality of managers like fergy and wenger to play anything other than attacking football. both 8-2 and 6-1 are slightly misleading scorelines. Not sure if serious :dontknow: Fergie himself said he wanted the players to shut shop after the 4 goal went and criticized Ferdinand and Evra for not doing that despite being experienced defenders.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now