Jump to content

Steyn reaches 250 wickets!!


ganeshran

Recommended Posts

Posted

amazing bowler, almost freakish you can say, i would say the bradman of bowling in the current era, purely because he is leagues above his competition. no one comes even remotely close to him right now going slightly offtopic referring to BP's post, i would say umesh yadav is the most skillful indian bowler i have seen at such an early stage of his career. i will be happy if he becomes even half as good as steyn

Posted
4th best Strike rate in History for any bowler who picked up more than 50 wickets. Only behind Shane Bond in the post war era
Shane Bond was the real deal. Injuries ate him up. :sad:
Posted
:cantstop:
Ah, don't compare him to Bhajji. Bhajji is the fourth highest wicket taker (among spinners) in the history of cricket. Steyn has more than 20 pacers ahead of him in terms of wickets. :winky:
Posted

Will go down as one of the all time greats..absolute legend. Also proves that you can still be the most admired bowler with a pace of 135-140 K if you can swing the ball both ways. Love watching him bowl. Saw him once in Bangalore during an IPL game. His rhythm is unbelievably good.

Posted
Ah' date=' don't compare him to Bhajji. Bhajji is the fourth highest wicket taker (among spinners) in the history of cricket. Steyn has more than 20 pacers ahead of him in terms of wickets. :winky:[/quote'] :giggle:
Posted
Shane Bond was the real deal. Injuries ate him up. :sad:
Ya. He was a brilliant bowler - IIRC he had back problems and couldnt fulfill his potential. :sad:
Shane Bond's bowling action was the best I've seen in a fast bowler. Incredible bowler.
Posted
4th best Strike rate in History for any bowler who picked up more than 50 wickets. Only behind Shane Bond in the post war era
Shane Bond was a freak, best among Lee, Akhtar, Bond, Steyn for me if not for injuries. PS: I am getting nostalgic, need to watch some Bond stuff on you tube.:winky:
Posted
ICL was the last nail in the coffin. He was already very prone to back injury
No. He joined ICL because he did not have much test cricket left in him due to injuries. He was never at his best in ICL. ICL was just a time pass for him as he was struggling with injuries and could not play test cricket. ICL was a step taken in frustration.
Posted
No. He joined ICL because he did not have much test cricket left in him due to injuries. He was never at his best in ICL. ICL was just a time pass for him as he was struggling with injuries and could not play test cricket. ICL was a step taken in frustration.
Thats what I said too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...