ShebbySB Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Aussie squad of 13:-Michael Clarke (capt),Ed Cowan,David Warner,Shaun Marsh, Ricky Ponting,Michael Hussey,Daniel Christian,Brad Haddin,Peter Siddle,James Pattinson,Ben Hilfenhaus,Mitchell Starc,Nathan Lyon.Marsh is a doubtful starter for the 1st test & chances of him missing the contest is pretty high.
kevinpp24 Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Obviously. Most of their batsmen are searching for form add to that their reasonably weak bowling lineup. But how will it end up if India manages to beat Aus?
Needforspeed Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Don't underestimate the Aussies. Apne Ghar mein Kuthe bhi Sher ban jaate hain.
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Don't underestimate the Aussies. Apne Ghar mein Kuthe bhi Sher ban jaate hain. I couldn't have said it any better:two_thumbs_up:
saneindian Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 With a weak squad they have won a series in SL and drawn one vs SA in SA. Take them lightly at your own peril.
ShebbySB Posted December 21, 2011 Author Posted December 21, 2011 With a weak squad they have won a series in SL and drawn one vs SA in SA. Take them lightly at your own peril. No Watson or Harris:dontknow:
G_B_ Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 weakest , i would say they had some pretty weak sides in the late 70s (PAcker series) and the 80s. This squad is the weakest for the past 20 years. If its weak enough for india to beat is another issue. I would say looking at Indian squads to Aus in 2003 and 2008 our side is certainly in much better shape even on a bowling front on paper.
Old guy Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 weakest , i would say they had some pretty weak sides in the late 70s (PAcker series) and the 80s. This squad is the weakest for the past 20 years. If its weak enough for india to beat is another issue. I would say looking at Indian squads to Aus in 2003 and 2008 our side is certainly in much better shape even on a bowling front on paper. on paper yes .. on fitness.. NO :(( well this time in first game we might see our best 2 bowlers break down if that happens we will lose first match would take replacement 1 more match to adjust by that time series is already lost lol
Andrew Peter Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Abe etna overconfidence mat dikhao saalo . Australians no matter how weak are still strong enough to beat us in there own backyard .
saneindian Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 No Watson or Harris:dontknow: In Warner and Pattinson, they have got more than fair replacements for those two. Also, Jhonson not being there is a positive for them too, was utterly rubbish in SA and SL.
phaedrus Posted December 21, 2011 Posted December 21, 2011 Abe etna overconfidence mat dikhao saalo . Australians no matter how weak are still strong enough to beat us in there own backyard . especially with our bowling attack.
Karan114 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Its not a great squad by any means, no, but in home conditions they have more than enough quality to beat us. We don't have a single fit and reliable bowler - Zaheer is class but his fitness is extremely dodgy, and the others are just not that good or inexperienced.
Deleted_User_1 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 No....the Aussie side which played India down under during 85-86 was weaker.
ShebbySB Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 No....the Aussie side which played India down under during 85-86 was weaker. I was born 7 years later:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
chainsmoker1985 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Bullshiiit, You Never Play Against A Weak Australian Team. Whether they have mostly new-comers, but it will be a heck of a challenge to beat them. Australian standards of Cricket are always high
zep1706 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 I was born 7 years later:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Don't laugh, after a few years you will also be an old man like dandaroy :winky:
G_B_ Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 I honestly dont think that calling this aussie side the weakest in 20 years is off the mark. Its not overconfidence to say that. Many in the aussie media have called them just that. But to say that the indian team is much stronger than the aussie team is over confidence. I can honestly see England easily retaining the ashes when Aus come over regardless of what the result is for this series.
Karan114 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 I can honestly see England easily retaining the ashes when Aus come over regardless of what the result is for this series. I don't think there is any question England are going to be dominant at home for quite some time now, looking at their amazing fast bowling depth. Big question is whether they can do it away from home consistently, particularly in the subcontinent.
G_B_ Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 I don't think there is any question England are going to be dominant at home for quite some time now' date=' looking at their amazing fast bowling depth. Big question is whether they can do it away from home consistently, particularly in the subcontinent.[/quote'] I dont think they can. But the ashes home and away i feel they will be able to do it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now