vvvslaxman Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 IIRC he was talking as Auro in that match' date='so may hv been on purpose to sound stupid[/quote'] hahaha :hysterical: May very well be true.
Crookbond Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 OK - Anyways, the fact of giving boundaries/sixes has taken place earlier. One of them is documented.
vvvslaxman Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 If you look at Mark waugh's suggestion of Umar Gul's promotion it clearly lacked cricket knowledge. It is as bad as sending Zaheer khan at 3 by Vettori.
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 If you look at Mark waugh's suggestion of Umar Gul's promotion it clearly lacked cricket knowledge. It is as bad as sending Zaheer khan at 3 by Vettori. Umar has just won a match with his big hitting.anway it was just as a pinch hitter to take advantage of PP.so wasnt such a bad idea.plus I dont see much difference in Nazir n Gul's batting abilities:giggle:
Crookbond Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 +1 for Gaylord - Nazir, Afridi, Gul .. sifar difference!
vvvslaxman Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 Dude.. at current form Ashwin > Gambhir. Would you send him there? Point is how can you send a hack like Umar Gul at no.3 based on one match. His test average is 10. ODI average is 9. T20 average is 11.
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 +1 for Gaylord - Nazir' date=' Afridi, Gul .. sifar difference![/quote'] I told u bhagwaan ji was better:whack:
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 Dude.. at current form Ashwin > Gambhir. Would you send him there? Point is how can you send a hack like Umar Gul at no.3 based on one match. His test average is 10. ODI average is 9. T20 average is 11. wont be a bad idea actually:giggle: point is its a nothing to lose situation in T20s,just go n have a hit,if it works,ur run rate goes up n best bowlers overs r used up,if it doesnt u dont lose a proper batsman
saket123 Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 I said that during the England trip too where we got whitewashed. A year or so after the world cup, the Indian team didn't seem interested at all. Mark is spot on.
vvvslaxman Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 wont be a bad idea actually:giggle: point is its a nothing to lose situation in T20s,just go n have a hit,if it works,ur run rate goes up n best bowlers overs r used up,if it doesnt u dont lose a proper batsman That is what Ganguly says.. Afridi is also the same kind of guy. But atleast he used to be a batsman long long ago so long ago. :cantstop: . Umar Gul has very limited shots to make use of powerplay. He could waste lot of deliveries and lose his wicket. It was an utterly fluke innings where he murdered Albie (that can be done by anybody) .
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 That is what Ganguly says.. Afridi is also the same kind of guy. But atleast he used to be a batsman long long ago so long ago. :cantstop: . Umar Gul has very limited shots to make use of powerplay. He could waste lot of deliveries and lose his wicket. It was an utterly fluke innings where he murdered Albie (that can be done by anybody) . actually hes a good hitter of fast bowler,have seen him hit Finn n Co. on England tour.yeah he COULD take a lot of deliveries n get out.but he could fire the same.its a risk worth taking.
vvvslaxman Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 actually hes a good hitter of fast bowler' date='have seen him hit Finn n Co. on England tour.yeah he COULD take a lot of deliveries n get out.but he could fire the same.its a risk worth taking.[/quote'] They should have sent Umar Akmal at no.3 instead of at no.7. He might not be a kohli. But he is still their best batsman or Jamshed who is an opener.
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 They should have sent Umar Akmal at no.3 instead of at no.7. He might not be a kohli. But he is still their best batsman. yeah agree on that.
Crookbond Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 I told u bhagwaan ji was better:whack: Isliye toh Gaylord bola. :giggle:
Lord Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 Isliye toh Gaylord bola. :giggle: cant think of anything else:((
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now