Old guy Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Sabby bhai, that's not what i meant and it wasn't toward you..it was a in general to all those who seems to have an issue with pakistan wants to be the top rank team...thats all.. after all what is the goal of playing sport? to win and be at the top ..does indian people expect pak managment to say oh we won't try to be the best team in the world.... people are crticizing pakistan for winning in UAE but the same people enjoy indian winning at home and go up the rrank to number 1... oh well... i know and i have no problem with that right now we are going down and they are going up they have every right to think so they just beat no 1 test team but i was talking abt series in south africa i jsut gave my opinion i may very well be wrong i cant really contorl that but have u ever seen me behave like those people? i like to look at all teams in unbiased way and yes u r correct every team wants to be best and every good team has potential there is nothing wrong with wht management said but currently no 1 no.. i odnt think they are as good as south africa,england (i know u beat them but still) or even australia
wobblydoggy Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 well they are not getting much resistance from us
Lurker Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 And I am eyeing the CEO office from my desk. Thats where it ends though.
Alchemist Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 And I am eyeing the CEO office from my desk. Thats where it ends though. Thats too close though. Our CEO sits in different city on east coast.
Lurker Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Thats too close though. Our CEO sits in different city on east coast. Yeah we are a smaller shop. Everybody works here. If somebody takes off the building, I may just become the CEO... ..if I survive that is.
Sarkar Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Begging for Games with Pakistan Delusion is the word comes to my mind.
Sarkar Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 acha since now u've posted the scores of our batting this is quite one sided which i expected from ppl like u,why don't u write the scores of how much eng managed to score....... remember this if we get bundled out for 80 or 90 or 150 we don't let the opposition score 650 or 600 + without even bowling them out and letting them declare on their whims and fancies,we bowl them out cheaply, just check out the scores of on how much u bowled out eng for and for how much we did and once again that series is no measure to compare and if u use that series we didn't loose "4-0",we have it in us to win abroad test matches aswell seriously u guys make me sick...........I know pakistani's batting isn't the best but the bowling is certainly among the best,and ur bowling is crap and u ppl come up with excuses that we have crap captain,bad fielders etc, the fact of the matter is ur bowling sucks that is why u cannot get 20 wickets in a test match and yeah one more thing for me a good performance with the bat would actually be a score in 3 figures e.g 150 because i know we can bundle them out for 80 or 90 May be you forgot three consecutive test series whitewashes in Aus its not as if Pakistan won series in England.
Pakistan Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 forget the england tour, i dont think india in it's entire 80 year history of playing cricket has ever had 3 scores of under 100 on a single tour. feel free to look that up. India tour of Australia, 1947/48 1st Test: Australia v India at Brisbane - Nov 28-Dec 4, 1947 Australia 382/8d; India 58 and 98 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 226 runs Scorecard 2nd Test: Australia v India at Sydney - Dec 12-18, 1947 India 188 and 61/7; Australia 107 Match drawn Scorecard 3rd Test: Australia v India at Melbourne - Jan 1-5, 1948 Australia 394 and 255/4d; India 291/9d and 125 Australia won by 233 runs Scorecard 4th Test: Australia v India at Adelaide - Jan 23-28, 1948 Australia 674; India 381 and 277 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 16 runs Scorecard | Article index (2) 5th Test: Australia v India at Melbourne - Feb 6-10, 1948 Australia 575/8d; India 331 and 67 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 177 runs Scorecard India tour of England, 1952 1st Test: England v India at Leeds - Jun 5-9, 1952 India 293 and 165; England 334 and 128/3 England won by 7 wickets Scorecard | Article index (3) | Photo index (1) 2nd Test: England v India at Lord's - Jun 19-24, 1952 India 235 and 378; England 537 and 79/2 England won by 8 wickets Scorecard | Photo index (1) 3rd Test: England v India at Manchester - Jul 17-19, 1952 England 347/9d; India 58 and 82 (f/o) England won by an innings and 207 runs Scorecard | Photo index (1) 4th Test: England v India at The Oval - Aug 14-19, 1952 England 326/6d; India 98 Match drawn Scorecard
Sarkar Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 India tour of Australia' date= 1947/48 1st Test: Australia v India at Brisbane - Nov 28-Dec 4, 1947 Australia 382/8d; India 58 and 98 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 226 runs Scorecard 2nd Test: Australia v India at Sydney - Dec 12-18, 1947 India 188 and 61/7; Australia 107 Match drawn Scorecard 3rd Test: Australia v India at Melbourne - Jan 1-5, 1948 Australia 394 and 255/4d; India 291/9d and 125 Australia won by 233 runs Scorecard 4th Test: Australia v India at Adelaide - Jan 23-28, 1948 Australia 674; India 381 and 277 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 16 runs Scorecard | Article index (2) 5th Test: Australia v India at Melbourne - Feb 6-10, 1948 Australia 575/8d; India 331 and 67 (f/o) Australia won by an innings and 177 runs Scorecard India tour of England, 1952 1st Test: England v India at Leeds - Jun 5-9, 1952 India 293 and 165; England 334 and 128/3 England won by 7 wickets Scorecard | Article index (3) | Photo index (1) 2nd Test: England v India at Lord's - Jun 19-24, 1952 India 235 and 378; England 537 and 79/2 England won by 8 wickets Scorecard | Photo index (1) 3rd Test: England v India at Manchester - Jul 17-19, 1952 England 347/9d; India 58 and 82 (f/o) England won by an innings and 207 runs Scorecard | Photo index (1) 4th Test: England v India at The Oval - Aug 14-19, 1952 England 326/6d; India 98 Match drawn Scorecard But But U r batting greats like Moyo Butt Malik contributed to low scores thrice in this era.
Utalk Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Sarkar your obsession with Pakistan is becoming rather tiresome. Give it a rest or join some political forum. Every cricket thread related to Pakistan is polluted by your nonsensical posts.
Singham Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Pak's batting is pathetic. They won't get there.
dial_100 Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Pakistan do not have home advantage. They wont be playing with big teams as much. There is no way they are going beyond 3rd or 4th position for at least 3 years. Can't predict beyond that time frame. India is going to be much weaker team in next 2 years. But Aus and SA will be decent enough to keep Pak from getting there. Pak will continue to struggle with Ind, Eng and SL for the 3rd & 4th position. If we know what test cricket is about.
Pioneer Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 tum logon ki ***** ko tape se saat dena chahiye. seriously, how do you pakis keep coming up with so much trash ?? lets look at pakistan's scores on their tour of england: 1st test: 182 & 80 2nd test: 72 & 296 3rd test: 308 & 148/6 4th test: 74 & 147 THREE scores below 100...another 2 below 200. how is that 'way better' ?? forget the england tour, i dont think india in it's entire 80 year history of playing cricket has ever had 3 scores of under 100 on a single tour. feel free to look that up. and then the other paki a few posts above says "who knows,they might show up a good performance with the bat" :hysterical::hysterical: a 'good performance with the bat' for pakistan in SA would be making 3 figures...:haha: i have never seen a team make more double digit scores against good teams than pakistan. Man stfu you retarded or something ? We won two test matches in England, who gives a **** about the scores under 100 because the fact is we won two test matches while you ****ers got whipped 4-0.
Sarkar Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Sarkar your obsession with Pakistan is becoming rather tiresome. Give it a rest or join some political forum. Every cricket thread related to Pakistan is polluted by your nonsensical posts. What about your tailunted pak icfers .
Tendulkar_Bhai Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 fyi Moshin is married to an INDIAN ladee!
mahesh_g Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Man stfu you retarded or something ? We won two test matches in England' date=' who gives a **** about the scores under 100 because the fact is we won two test matches while you ****ers got whipped 4-0.[/quote'] Calling an Indian fan retard in Indian Cricket Forum? not sure if any indian can do that in shtpassn. BTW Did you not check how Indian team performed prior to England series? in WI, SA, Australia, NZ? How many series has your great team won in WI? how many matches have you guys won in Australia in the last 15 yrs? how many series have you guys won in England? You are one of the retards here from shthle country.
ali0786 Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Yes credit should be given for playing on patta tracks of UAE. are you stupid? did you see the scores of this test series? you don't get bowled out for 72 on patta tracks. Scores in 1st test: 192, 338, 160, 15-0 2nd test: 257, 327, 214, 72
Laaloo Posted January 31, 2012 Posted January 31, 2012 Man stfu you retarded or something ? We won two test matches in England' date=' who gives a **** about the scores under 100 because the fact is we won two test matches while you ****ers got whipped 4-0.[/quote'] Somebody got riled up :hysterical: :hysterical:
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted February 1, 2012 Posted February 1, 2012 I hope our future No.1 position is never questionable unlike India's or England's. Complete domination must be our objective.
TheWall Posted February 1, 2012 Posted February 1, 2012 I hope our future No.1 position is never questionable unlike India's or England's. Complete domination must be our objective. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: ur future - is it measured in light years...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now