Sehwag1830 Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 We won lots of tournament in 90s like : 1. Asia cup 2. Sharjah cup 3. Independence cup 4. Titan cup 5. Hero cup 6. Wills World series I can't remember any significant trophy won by Ganguly's odi team apart from natwest trophy. On the contrary we lost so many finals .
The Outsider Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Natwest trophy is the biggest joke being propagated in Indian ODI history as some sort of achievement - it was a freaking Kitply tournament with one side which has consistently sucked in ODIs and another who can't put bat to ball away from the subcontinent.
saneindian Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 The Natwest win gets glorified due to a couple of things: 1. Highest ever score chased in finals/in England/At Lord's/By India 2. Two newbies winning the game for us which was nearly dead
vvvslaxman Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 They won lot of trophies. Everything they won was in subcontinent. There was one series . traingular series between India/Kenya/Bangladesh :cantstop:
Sehwag1830 Posted March 12, 2012 Author Posted March 12, 2012 They won lot of trophies. Everything they won was in subcontinent. There was one series . traingular series between India/Kenya/Bangladesh :cantstop: And India managed to lose one match even in that series. :hysterical:
vvvslaxman Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 And India managed to lose one match even in that series. :hysterical: Maurice odumbe downed INdia singlehandedly.
Sehwag1830 Posted March 12, 2012 Author Posted March 12, 2012 But point still remains. India under Ganguly lost lots of final even in the sub-continent .
vvvslaxman Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 But point still remains. India under Ganguly lost lots of final even in the sub-continent . Dont think India won any ODI series at home in India let alone tournaments.
vvvslaxman Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 correction.. they beat SA once and Zimb twice.
Sid Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 But he was great ,he was developing players at that time,so that those players become mature and win matches for some future kaptaans.Gangu basically developed talents for us,winning tournaments doesnt matter,his agggrraassssshhhiive nature was the key.
gaurav92 Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 But he was great ' date='he was developing players at that time,so that those players become mature and win matches for some future kaptaans.Gangu basically developed talents for us,winning tournaments doesnt matter,his agggrraassssshhhiive nature was the key.[/quote'] :cantstop:
Crookbond Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Dont think India won any ODI series at home in India let alone tournaments. I guess apart from Ganguly's first ODI series versus South Africa in 1999-2000 we didn't win against good teams even at home including West Indies and England. He has a poor record in ODIs, even at home.
Number Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Where matters the most our record in Champions Trophy and World Cup was good under Ganguly. We won Jeet Lo Dil Series in Pakistan. Doubt 90s team could have done that.
Crookbond Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Where matters the most our record in Champions Trophy and World Cup was good under Ganguly. We won Jeet Lo Dil Series in Pakistan. Doubt 90s team could have done that. We shared CT and finals of the WC. Unfortunately, this tourneys are such that they are all-glory titles. You win you are the kind, you lose and you are a beggar.
Stuge Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Natwest trophy is the biggest joke being propagated in Indian ODI history as some sort of achievement - it was a freaking Kitply tournament with one side which has consistently sucked in ODIs and another who can't put bat to ball away from the subcontinent. you know why ? its because at one time everyone thought we lost the game ,and nothing was expected from UV and Kaif .this is reason people still rate that match quite high .
Crookbond Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 you know why ? its because at one time everyone thought we lost the game ' date='and nothing was expected from UV and Kaif .this is reason people still rate that match quite high .[/quote'] I concur. But, it doesn't display Ganguly's captaincy skills - does it?
SLICKR392 Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 How many good ODI players did we have in the 90's? Even our bowlers were horrible at those times and yet we won so many of those tourneys.
CG Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 How many good ODI players did we have in the 90's? Even our bowlers were horrible at those times and yet we won so many of those tourneys. Kumble was gun in odis ,so was srinath suppported by venky.
singhprakash72 Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 90s was a story of subcontinental success both in ODI and Test for India but disaster outside. Ganguly's team at least started challenging strong teams like Aus and SA with decent performance in CTs and WC2003. Again 90s was so dependent on SRT (one man army) but 2000s started the trend of young turks like Yuvi,kaif,sehwag became integral part of ODI team...so I wouldn't downgrade Ganguly's team effort in any way from 90s.
Sehwag1830 Posted March 12, 2012 Author Posted March 12, 2012 90s was a story of subcontinental success both in ODI and Test for India but disaster outside. Ganguly's team at least started challenging strong teams like Aus and SA with decent performance in CTs and WC2003. Again 90s was so dependent on SRT (one man army) but 2000s started the trend of young turks like Yuvi' date='kaif,sehwag became integral part of ODI team...so I wouldn't downgrade Ganguly's team effort in any way from 90s.[/quote'] And not even able to win against WI and ENG at home. :cantstop:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now