indiaregulator Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Both similar players, arrogant brash yet daunting and brilliant. Who's the better player?
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Amar ukmal is better than both I think I saw green lipstick marks on kohli's pants today
Momos Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Very similar players..Elegant ,brash ... Though Kp is better at the moment ,he has a lot of issues running round..The country switch wasn't a good decision imo..Kohli willl surly leapfrog him.
Momos Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Sadagopan Ramesh Luls..Isnt he a southie movie superstar these days??
Zelig Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Luls..Isnt he a southie movie superstar these days?? :agree: He ain't a SS though
cameron_black Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 KP by miles. kohli coming up faster, but have to notch up some tons on demanding pitch conditions first.
Cricket Tragic Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Is this a joke? KP has 19 (?) test hundreds.
jairamesh Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Too young to judge in Tests. But in ODIs, Kohli full stop. Pietersen only delivers when the chips are down, hopeless at chasing big totals, and contrary to his "aggressive approach", he is rather one paced in ODIs and slow by today's standard. Remember he was so hopeless at ODIs over the last two-three years, only the after Ashes, the management had to promote him to open where he was less of a liability and play risk free cricket. Kohli along with Amla, Sanga, Clarke, Dhoni, Hussey and AB De Villiers are currently the best ODI players. Kohli and AB De Villiers have the edge over the others in terms of their ability to chase big totals, play long innings and accelerate.
ganeshran Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Kohli needs time for this comparison to be made. this
Cricket Tragic Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Too young to judge in Tests. But in ODIs, Kohli full stop. Pietersen only delivers when the chips are down, hopeless at chasing big totals, and contrary to his "aggressive approach", he is rather one paced in ODIs and slow by today's standard. Remember he was so hopeless at ODIs over the last two-three years, only the after Ashes, the management had to promote him to open where he was less of a liability and play risk free cricket. Kohli along with Amla, Sanga, Clarke, Dhoni, Hussey and AB De Villiers are currently the best ODI players. Kohli and AB De Villiers have the edge over the others in terms of their ability to chase big totals, play long innings and accelerate. Sanga does not belong there. He makes 90 ball 60s far too often and has a **** conversion rate for someone who bats at 3. Not a great career s/r either.
Crookbond Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 By the way these comparison threads are being rolled out (Kohli vs Bradman/AB DeVillers, Kevin Pietersen, Randy Orton!), we will soon have Kohli compared to Lionel Messi, Ian Thorpe, Lance Armstrong, Mike Tyson too. :facepalm:
jairamesh Posted March 18, 2012 Posted March 18, 2012 Sanga does not belong there. He makes 90 ball 60s far too often and has a **** conversion rate for someone who bats at 3. Not a great career s/r either. True, I just whizzed thru the current top 10 odi rankings, and Sanga fulfilled my sixth choice, purely for aesthetics reasons, enjoy his shot-making. The other option was between Dilshan or Watson, both whose role is slash and play risk free without really judging match situation, both would struggle imo to regularly chase big scores. (but apparently Watson has the best average:hmmm: when chasing, Kohli is second). I would lump the likes of Dilshan, Watson, Pietersen, Sehwag together as ideal "roll the dice" option.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now