Jump to content

Ganguly regrets hasty international retirement


Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at some people who still refuse to retire from anything, both Ganguly and Dravid must be feeling that they were hasty. They didn't realise that retirement age in Indian cricket is 60.

Posted
Looking at some people who still refuse to retire from anything' date=' both Ganguly and Dravid must be feeling that they were hasty. [b']They didn't realise that retirement age in Indian cricket is 60.
they dont have that luxury....:winky:
Posted
^^^ Ian Pont...guy is fantastic! former bangladeshi bowling coach and current Dhaka Gladiators Coach! Under him, bangladesh banlgawashed the kiwis, our bangla bowlers (especially our pacers) gained confidence that they never had before and also the Gladiators won the 1st edition of Bpl. Best ting about him is that he can bring the best out of any player in the world and he's fantastic! Not meaning to brag or anything but if u notice, the kiwis really struggled to score in that series against our pacers and spinners!
isnt Ian Pont the same guy who was hyping up Atul sharma
Posted
isnt Ian Pont the same guy who was hyping up Atul sharma
I have read this claim about Pont many times. Especially from our brothers on Pakistan sites. I only found one interview about Sharma from Pont where he said this: Ian Pont: ....Some people who've worked with Atul have said that he's been bowling at around 100mph and in practise conditions in the net (without a batsman) his hand release speed has been clocked as high as 105mph. Now I don't know how his hand release speed will equate to actual match speed because he's never been clocked bowling in a game, he hasn't played a game of cricket for 7 years. He's been out in South Africa for the last 4 months and when I was out there working with him he was bowling at around the 90mph mark.....I would suggest that Atul is probably going to be bowling at around 90mph and that's where he'll be for most of his deliveries but he is capable of bowling much faster when it doesn't matter where the ball is going. Pont clearly claims Sharma could bowl at 90 mph. 100s of bowlers can do that. I don't see hype in this. Indeed this interview suggested that Sharma wasn't even accurate. Can we put the Sharma idiot to bed now? The media hyped this up, not anyone else.
Posted

I'd become too powerful for too long, says Sourav Ganguly

Many of your well-wishers hold the view that once you went unsold at the January 2011 IPL auction, you should've quit all forms of the game... Many believe that the crores tempted you. Your response? I'm definitely not playing because of money. In fact, I can earn more if I give more time to television... I can earn more if I sit in my father's chair and look after our business. If I'm still playing, it's because I love cricket... Enjoy playing the game. Let me add that the money I get from the IPL isn't that great. When I started playing Ranji Trophy, in 1989-90, I'd get Rs 400 for every match.
:WTF:
Posted
^^^ Ian Pont...guy is fantastic! former bangladeshi bowling coach and current Dhaka Gladiators Coach! Under him, bangladesh banlgawashed the kiwis, our bangla bowlers (especially our pacers) gained confidence that they never had before and also the Gladiators won the 1st edition of Bpl. Best ting about him is that he can bring the best out of any player in the world and he's fantastic! Not meaning to brag or anything but if u notice, the kiwis really struggled to score in that series against our pacers and spinners!
I saw that BD won that 4-0 but was this down to Pont or the head coach at that time? Are you saying his influence is that strong? Also, what evidence is there he can "bring the best out of any player in the world?"
Posted

Some typical responses as expected. The name Ganguly is enough for some people to lose their sense of reasoning. From his comeback in SA to his retirement, Ganguly was among India's best batsmen. The selectors still wanted to kick him out and didn't pick him for the Irani trophy. He was good enough to keep playing. Ganguly played with greater determination than at any other point in his career. Technically solid too. 16k6yx4.png

Posted

i think he was really playing well that time, he had a good home series vs saffers in 08, then had a great series vs aus at home.he could have played more from then, but its okay, we have to look for future alternative, he served indian cricket very well, no need to regret :hatsoff:

Posted
Some typical responses as expected. The name Ganguly is enough for some people to lose their sense of reasoning. From his comeback in SA to his retirement, Ganguly was among India's best batsmen. The selectors still wanted to kick him out and didn't pick him for the Irani trophy. He was good enough to keep playing. Ganguly played with greater determination than at any other point in his career. Technically solid too. 16k6yx4.png
Skewed home-away ratio. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/28779.html?class=1;home_or_away=2;spanmin1=15+Nov+2006;spanval1=span;template=results;type=allround Only century away versus Bangladesh. The only good knocks were against South Africa (87) and Pakistan (239).
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical: like our other batsman have put the earth on fire abroad.
Only replying to the technically good part - not saying others were gods.
Posted
Only replying to the technically good part - not saying others were gods.
Ct said after sa he improved his technique and that was evident ,he cut short his backlift and bouncer was not so much a problem.he scored well in sa and eng got starts in aus.but technically he was better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...