Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well what was the aftermath then ,terrorism in Punjab air India bombing,if it wasn't for kps gill and baint Singh Punjab would have been another Kashmir ,well speaking of Kashmir ,releasing mehboba mufti for terrorists and kandhar kand were also embarrassing.
Posted
Well what was the aftermath then ,terrorism in Punjab air India bombing,if it wasn't for kps gill and baint Singh Punjab would have been another Kashmir ,well speaking of Kashmir ,releasing mehboba mufti for terrorists and kandhar kand were also embarrassing.
Actually its because of operations like Blue-Star that terrorism could be flushed out of Punjab. Terrorism didnt start with Blue Star, Blue Star was a culmination of it.
Posted
Not really ' date='I agree it was painful ,but it was an important lesson[b'],coz it made us think about our security and made us better prepared for future wars,embarrassing moment was operation bluestar ,when military went inside golden temple premises.
:hysterical::hysterical: Yea right, please check on how many bomb blasts have happened in Pune/Mumbai/Delhi in the last decade. Lets not even get into what a monumental fu>k up 26/11 was. A handful of militants come from Pakistan in a fishing vessel and hold a city of some 20 million to ransom. From Wiki:
Ten terrorists leave Karachi, Pakistan in a boat and travel for thirty-eight hours, remaining undetected by the Indian Navy.
Better prepared, my ****!
Posted
Actually its because of operations like Blue-Star that terrorism could be flushed out of Punjab. Terrorism didnt start with Blue Star' date=' Blue Star was a culmination of it.[/quote'] Exactly
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical: Yea right, please check on how many bomb blasts have happened in Pune/Mumbai/Delhi in the last decade. Lets not even get into what a monumental fu>k up 26/11 was. A handful of militants come from Pakistan in a fishing vessel and hold a city of some 20 million to ransom. From Wiki: Better prepared, my ****!
i was talking about 65,71 war dumbo where does 26/11 comes into picture,mind u shastri and indira were on whole different level then these leeches,so think before u say and 26/11 was coz of idiots in parliament who even after getting warning from intelligence neglected it.
Posted
Exactly
not really that event happened on martyrdom day of fifth guru arjun dev ji ,so it sent the bad message to sikh community also media blackout and reports from brahm chellany stating that casualties here is a para from wiki about it: [The use of artillery in the congested inner city of Amritsar proved deadly to many civilian bystanders living near the Golden Temple. The media blackout throughout the Punjab resulted in widespread doubt regarding the official stories and aided the promotion of hearsay and rumour.[54] The operation is criticised on four main grounds, the choice of time of attack by Government, heavy casualty, loss of property, and allegation of human rights violations by Army personnel. Special Magistrate of Punjab Mr.A R Darshi writes in his book, The Gallant Defender: "Brutalities committed by the Indian Army on the Sikhs during Operation Blue Star, were shocking and terrific. Innocent Sikhs old, young and children, were mercilessly slaughtered. Women were raped by the soldiers." G.K.C Reddy writes "Thus the Operation Bluestar will go down in the history as one of the biggest massacres of unarmed civilians by the organised military force of a nation." [55] Chand Joshi writes "Army units acted in total anger and unwittingly shot down all the suspects rounded up from Golden Temple complex". [56] BBC's Mark Tully (and Satish Jacob), Amritsar; Mrs. Gandhi's Last Battle, wrote "Any army which wants to destroy a nation destroys its culture. That is why Indian army burnt the Sikh [Reference] Library."]and less said about indira's assassination and anti sikh riots the better,any way let bygone's be bygone's.
Posted

coming back to the topic china attack made the govt of that time more determined about making army better prepared as well as having a nuclear bomb to thwart any future advances of chinese.

Posted
20121020_ASP001_0.jpg India and China - Unsettled for a long time yet
A deal over the border has for years been self-evident: China gets to keep Aksai Chin in the west and India gets to keep the 80,000 square kilometres of Arunachal Pradesh, which China informally calls “South Tibet”. In the past China has signalled a readiness to settle the dispute along just such lines. But Indian leaders and parliament have always balked, saying voters would not tolerate losing an inch of territory, even when no settled populations are involved.
http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21564861-fifty-years-after-nasty-high-altitude-war-border-dispute-remains-unresolved
Posted
All 3 of my father's sisters got married to Army officers and given my father was the youngest in his family all 3 were deployed in one war or the other or more than one. I don't believe everything they say because first hand involvement leads to some degree of prejudice, but more or less their accounts seem accurate. I can't vouch for anything in the following paragraphs because they are just anecdotes related to me by them. In the '62 war, the initial reaction of the country was divided between euphoric and surprise. There was a segment of the population which felt that China's incursion on "our land" was meant to be answered by force and there was a larger segment of the country which was surprised at the decision to go to war over barren land with completely ill equipped forces. There were editorials comparing human life with 20000 feet mountains where even mountain goats find it hard to survive. I've already described the pitiful conditions Indian soldiers fought under. It was one of the biggest blunders of independent India in my opinion. The '65 war was much more planned an better executed. The Pakistani operation to infiltrate Kashmir was well known while they were doing it and India smartly waited till they launched an army attack. But by then India already knew this and had deployed strategic forces in J&K. This war's success is attributed in a major part to India's intelligence service and the support of local Kashmiris. However, there were accounts of India killing spies without a trial, most of the time at gun point which are largely true. The '71 war, was officially started by Pakistan by having their air force bomb Indian land, but there is no denying that India was supporting an insurgency in Bangladesh. Indira Gandhi wanted to prove to the world that Pakistan's existence as a Muslim state is a sham and they would not be able to unite even their own Muslims. There was no way India was going to lose this war unless there was involvement from other countries. US almost did so by floating submarines in the Indian Ocean but Nehru's past good terms with Russia meant that they were being tailgated. The quickness of the war and ceasefire sometimes hides the struggles of Bangladeshi citizens for years. India definitely had a part to play in the initiation of this war despite it being officially started by Pakistan. Many pundits felt that India let Pakistan off too easy in this war, but India had supposedly promised Russia that it would not leverage victory to gain land for their support in the Indian Ocean face off.
:two_thumbs_up: Thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...